We performed a comparison between Dell CloudIQ and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Has really nice roll-up dashboards."
"The best thing about this solution is that you can check for the infrastructure and system updates that you might need to be compliant with the Cloud."
"Mobile application is the most valuable feature for us. We can monitor all the storages on our phones. It's really good."
"The tool for forecasting capacity is valuable."
"Fewer vulnerabilities have been observed in the four years we have used the solution."
"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"The easy user interface was what I found most valuable in HPE OneView. For example, if I wanted to know the infrastructure status or I needed to send in any change commands, HPE OneView had simple buttons."
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"The hypervisor and cluster profiles make it easy to integrate with VMware."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"We lose less time managing the machines."
"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."
"In terms of improvement, they should enhance the product range."
"PowerScale is the only file system offered and that is limiting."
"The reporting capabilities of this solution could be improved."
"Supporting legacy systems is an area that can be improved."
"Doesn't do well in terms of integrating with technologies other than Dell."
"I think HPE could make more user-friendly interfaces, exclude Java and move to an HTML5 platform, make more detailed documentation, and lower the price."
"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."
"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."
"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."
Dell CloudIQ is ranked 41st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 5 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Dell CloudIQ is rated 7.8, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell CloudIQ writes "Easily visualize your environment's performance and forecast its capacity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Dell CloudIQ is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Moogsoft, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator, NetApp Cloud Insights and Zabbix, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Dell CloudIQ vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.