

Appian and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence are key competitors in the low-code development and process intelligence categories. Appian appears to have the edge due to its low-cost model and versatility, while SAP Signavio Process Intelligence excels in process mining.
Features: Appian offers a robust low-code development platform, allowing for rapid app deployment. Its process models enable high agility and ease of use. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence provides deep insights into process flows with specialized process mining capabilities, emphasizing comprehensive integration with SAP systems.
Room for Improvement: Appian could enhance its UI customization and mobile capabilities and improve offline access and integration options. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence lacks user-friendliness outside SAP ecosystems and could improve non-SAP integration and pricing transparency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian supports various cloud deployment options with strong customer service and responsiveness. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is also cloud-compatible but can be limited in non-SAP environments, needing more SAP systems for optimal efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: Appian's pricing is competitive, promising quicker ROI due to its rapid development model. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is perceived as expensive, with complex pricing models that might hinder ROI prediction, though significant returns are noted in process optimization.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
The Return on Investment is significant.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Ideally, there should be separate support for different modules, particularly for organizations using several different SAP products.
Whenever we've needed them, they're there, logging cases and providing effective updates on the cases.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Due to its inability to support multi-event logs, I have to re-extract data even if it already exists, leading to duplication.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence would be more suitable for bigger organizations, specifically mid to large.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
Regarding the stability of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, I would give it a 10, as I find there are no stability issues.
Regarding stability, there are no complaints as it is very stable.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
It also suggests the best automation process that can be configured within Appian.
It would be helpful if they have their e-learning content segregated for different roles—for example, training specific to business users, training for leads, and training for consultants and analysts who are going to work on the tool as developers.
We recently did an analysis in which we were almost going to pay 10 times the cost of a normal process mining tool if we used SAP Signavio.
They should work on their networks and improve their servers because SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is in use more nowadays, resulting in busy servers.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
If it is an SAP process, it becomes a little cheaper, but if it is a non-SAP process, then it becomes highly expensive.
The pricing of SAP Signavio could always be better.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
The real-time process visualization feature of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence has been really useful to get that first draft, that first picture that starts more detailed analysis and specific task areas.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence has an upper hand compared to other solutions because the integration from other software is far better in SAP.
The best feature of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is that it is not just Process Intelligence; it's a complete suite that comes with insights and mapping.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SAP Signavio Process Intelligence | 7.5% |
| Appian | 5.3% |
| Other | 87.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
Signavio Process Intelligence enables business users worldwide to run in-depth process analyses. ... Identify the root causes of poorly performing processes by detecting and visualizing compliance violations, monitor your process performance and act on critical cases and performance bottlenecks.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.