Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Signavio Process Intell...
Ranking in Process Mining
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 19.8%, up from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is 7.2%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

AntonioCardone - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables a data-driven approach to process analysis and helps generate cost savings
This tool allows me to discover value before discussing technology. It's the first solution that combines business competence and capabilities with technological capabilities. With Celonis, I discuss processes and root causes, analyzing the bottleneck resource process. There is an app centered around a data-driven approach. I can create the model and, in a data-driven way, map processes using technology that supports people in investigative activities by finding root causes where processes falter. Celonis emphasizes that these goals aim to generate cost optimization.
TigerPillay - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive understanding and efficiency of operational processes
Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency The most valuable features are Process Manager and Process Governance functionalities. The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"They have in-built connectors for connecting to various systems."
"What I found most valuable in Celonis is the ease of use. I also like that users can compare and contrast and derive any KPIs, keep track and see what's happening within the process via Celonis."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the PTS service."
"I have found the automatic mapping of the processes themselves to be a valuable feature."
"It provides a visualization of the process itself, giving a very good synthesis of performance and helping me find improvements."
"From a features perspective, the discovery and analytics parts of Celonis have been valuable, especially the analytics and all of the out-of-the-box process connectors."
"The solution offers a very good user interface."
"It performs well for connecting multiple processes."
"The product's best feature is the connection and integration between all of the capabilities."
"The product helps us build solid business use cases."
"It has the ability to create journey maps, and to connect journey maps to BTMM."
"Predominantly, it enables financial services organizations to build up process knowledge and improve operational efficiency."
"Being able to deploy in shorter cuts."
"Everything is valuable. If you're looking at the process documentation feature, it's really easy to use. We have official training from Signavio trainers, but sometimes I do the training myself very shortly for our colleagues. In less than one or two hours, they are already able to model the business process themselves. The language is really easy. The user interface is really easy. If you're talking about process simulation, we have customers and clients internally who are using it a lot, because they are from logistics or operations. They have numbers and KPIs behind the process. They know their numbers, so they have to see how they can improve a given business processes with a change in the task sequence or a change in the numbers of KPIs. If you're talking about the process mining, it is integrated into the whole solution."
"The backend is great."
"One of the most valuable things about process intelligence is that it allows you to mine data over a long period of time, such as one or two years. This gives us a deep understanding of how your processes actually work."
 

Cons

"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath. Maybe they can work on making it less expensive."
"It would be helpful if they could categorize processes into tier levels."
"One area for improvement is that, while Celonis has existing APIs for some domains like accounts, it lacks ready-made ones for others, like financial services. This means we need to customize our data channels so the data can be used by Celonis."
"With Celonis, the way to use the product is one of the main difficulties users face in our company."
"Essentially, the solution should allow for more plug and play instead of requiring a person to be adept at a certain level in coding and developing."
"The solution needs to implement more automation aspects into the product. Right now, it's lacking."
"The price could be better, but complexity is the biggest problem. Celonis is quite easy to operate once the customizations are done. You need a large amount of skill and knowledge to work with the tool. You need to understand it and know more than the basics."
"It could be less expensive."
"When it comes to Signavio, as I've worked on Celonis, I've observed two things in Celonis and Signavio. In Celonis, using the process mining tool, we can implement automation skills. So we can take actions to improve the process as well. That is one thing."
"The area that could be improved in SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is its Journey modeling feature."
"I would like to see a better version of the solution."
"SAP has to figure out a better way to price it. Their licensing structure isn't ideal as it's based on data; therefore, it's hard to estimate client costs."
"It should be able to convert business workflows into media documents quickly."
"The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use."
"Interface could be more user friendly."
"The UI could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing-wise, Celonis is a five out of ten right now because my clients just started with the solution. When my clients start looking at scaling Celonis, the cost will grow. Every user has an additional charge, and every gig of data you bring in costs extra."
"Celonis is expensive. It's not for mid or low-sized enterprises because the license price is high. Overall, it's quite pricey compared to anything else that I have heard about. But the good thing is that they don't charge per user. They charge for the data model."
"The product is pretty expensive but reasonable."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath."
"It is only affordable for large or public companies."
"Evaluating the price of the solution can be a difficult question. It is all about the business case and the return of the investments. That is typically how we also see this type of solution. It depends very much on the return. The entry-level is focused on enterprise size companies, for the SMB segment is it is out of their range. It is definitely expensive."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing is expensive."
"The solution is expensive, and I rate it an eight out of ten."
"I would not say the product was terribly expensive but I would not say it was cheap either."
"The costs of the solution require transparency since sometimes it refers to the number of users and sometimes the amount of volume that is used"
"It is a fairly expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
23%
Manufacturing Company
14%
University
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What do you like most about Celonis?
Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
I think it's relatively expensive, but it's also good. It's a good product, albeit on the expensive side.
What do you like most about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The product helps us build solid business use cases.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The solution is expensive but lesser than SolarWinds. It comes with free SAP licenses.
What needs improvement with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence?
The solution is not very intuitive. It is very complicated to use.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
NBN, T-System, Transurban, Audi BKK, Taifun, Met Office, Esquel Group, Sivantos, Consensus, Sirona
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.