Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Not all requests are attended to promptly.
I am totally satisfied with the response time and quality of support.
My impression of SAP HCM's technical support is great, as we get a lot of help and good feedback from them.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
This solution deserves a 10 because we can easily scale and upgrade to new versions.
SAP HCM is quite scalable.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
I would rate its stability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of SAP HCM as seven out of ten.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
I think Appian could improve by adding its own native GenAI and agentic capabilities.
SAP HCM needs to be more customizable to fit unique organizational processes.
SuccessFactors, a globally recognized and more easy-to-use tool, serves as a great substitute for some SAP HCM needs.
The organizational management (OM) side needs improvement due to frequent reorganization.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
SAP HCM is quite expensive, but considering solutions like Oracle, they are similar.
SAP HCM is costly compared to other ERPs like Microsoft Dynamics or Oracle, and I would rate the cost as one out of ten.
I would rate pricing for SAP as one because the price is high.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
When we face challenges and raise tickets, Red Hat provides support within an hour, fixes bugs, and allows us to move to production after resolving issues.
The main benefit SAP HCM provides is that we have all the information in one place; it is basically one centralized system with all the information rather than having multiple systems across the organization.
Capturing all the attendances and absences is a huge task that must be completed before running payroll.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Appian | 3.2% |
| Camunda | 7.2% |
| IBM BPM | 4.0% |
| Other | 85.6% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SAP HCM | 3.6% |
| Workday | 8.6% |
| SAP SuccessFactors | 8.5% |
| Other | 79.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 40 |
Appian provides AI automation for critical processes. The platform orchestrates AI agents, people, and systems within unified, governed workflows, giving AI the structure, data, and controls required for reliable enterprise value. The result is end-to-end automation that replaces fragmented manual work at scale.
SAP HCM brings together payroll, time management, personnel administration, and integration capabilities, enhancing HR management and operational workflows with user-friendly, stable, and scalable solutions.
SAP HCM is integral for HR departments seeking efficient management of employee lifecycles, from hiring to retirement. It provides comprehensive analytics and reporting tools and integrates smoothly with SuccessFactors. Customization and enterprise resource management integration extend its global appeal. However, users highlight the need for a unified data integration point, interface improvements, and modernization. Challenges include complexity, integration costs, and limited customization. Though cloud innovation is prioritized, on-premises options require attention to prevent obsolescence.
What are SAP HCM's key features?SAP HCM is widely used across industries for managing payroll, employee data, and HR processes. Its deployment in hybrid cloud and on-premises models allows businesses to optimize human resources while integrating with SuccessFactors. Organizations benefit from enhanced payroll functions, employee self-service features, and comprehensive integration with other enterprise systems.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
