No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.0
Apache JMeter is cost-effective, scalable, and integrates with CICD, offering significant ROI without licensing costs.
Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText Core Performance boosts ROI with cost savings, risk reduction, project clarity, and improved load-handling communication.
Sentiment score
7.9
ReadyAPI Test greatly boosts developer and QA productivity, automating 10,000 tests hourly, providing substantial ROI despite high costs.
With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.
Automation Architect at Aion Digital
I have seen a return on investment with OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud); the analysis part is quite helpful, which is quite more descriptive than the other products.
Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
CTO at Marco Technology
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
Partner at IS Nordic AS
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.3
Apache JMeter relies on a large community for support, offering helpful but sometimes delayed assistance compared to commercial tools.
Sentiment score
6.5
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud's support is helpful but inconsistent in response times and technical knowledge, affecting user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.3
ReadyAPI Test is user-friendly with responsive SmartBear support, though some users suggest improvement; online communities offer additional help.
With AI models ChatGPT, troubleshooting issues has become very easy for us.
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.
Automation Architect at Aion Digital
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
CTO at Marco Technology
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Apache JMeter is scalable but faces challenges with high loads and complex configurations, benefiting from distributed and cloud setups.
Sentiment score
7.5
OpenText Core Performance excels in scalability and flexibility for cloud testing, despite cost concerns, across various business environments.
Sentiment score
7.7
ReadyAPI Test is scalable, suitable for various teams, customizable with scripting, and generally satisfies users despite some integration issues.
We do have some methods where we can distribute the complete load between multiple systems and then try to do our testing.
QA Manager at Synechron
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
Partner at IS Nordic AS
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
CTO at Marco Technology
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Apache JMeter is reliable but faces stability issues with high loads and requires careful management for enterprise applications.
Sentiment score
7.7
Users generally find stability reliable despite occasional bugs, initial issues, and infrastructure challenges, comparable to NeoLoad and JMeter.
Sentiment score
7.1
ReadyAPI Test is stable and reliable with minor startup delays, improved from earlier versions, and highly praised for consistency.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
Previous versions of Apache JMeter were a little unstable, but the new versions are very stable.
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy
 

Room For Improvement

Apache JMeter needs enhanced user-friendliness, scalability, protocol support, and better integration with CI/CD tools and documentation.
OpenText Core Performance needs better setup, support, UI customization, monitoring, CI/CD integration, and enhanced documentation for users.
ReadyAPI Test needs better integration, support, documentation, performance, customization, and training, along with extended trials and improved stability.
With AI becoming more prominent, they can implement features where it can generate code by itself based on the results or provide suggestions.
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
Currently, we need to use multiple separate JMeter instances to simulate reductions in load, which isn't ideal.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial.
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies
The database schema and everything, if they generate on the fly, that will be quite helpful, rather than creating it on our own.
Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies
 

Setup Cost

Apache JMeter is a cost-effective, open-source performance testing tool suitable for smaller projects with extensive community and plugin support.
OpenText Core Performance's pricing is scalable and cost-effective but perceived as higher compared to some competitors.
ReadyAPI Test's high pricing and licensing issues lead users to suggest bundling and discounts for better affordability and clarity.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
Software QA Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
It's a cost-effective solution.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
Apache JMeter is completely free as it is open-source.
Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
CTO at Marco Technology
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
Partner at IS Nordic AS
As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.
Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies
 

Valuable Features

Apache JMeter offers a user-friendly, open-source platform for scalable, automated, and cost-effective performance testing with strong community support.
OpenText Core Performance offers scalable cloud-based testing with advanced analytics, integration, and automated reporting for global performance evaluations.
ReadyAPI Test is user-friendly, integrates well, supports database validations, and enables easy API, security, and UI testing with groovy scripting.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
Senior Solution Architect at HCLSoftware
It's useful for both the person conducting the test and the higher management, like project managers or senior executives, who may not know about the test.
Performance Test Engineer at CEI
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
Sr.Engineer csit Quality Assurance at Verizon
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well.
Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
CTO at Marco Technology
Its LoadRunner functionality allows us to record a solution's networking protocol and replay them.
Partner at IS Nordic AS
 

Mindshare comparison

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apache JMeter11.7%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.7%
Tricentis NeoLoad10.7%
Other64.9%
Performance Testing Tools
Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)8.6%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)12.7%
Apache JMeter11.7%
Other67.0%
Performance Testing Tools
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ReadyAPI Test2.1%
Tricentis Tosca12.0%
BrowserStack6.8%
Other79.1%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

RR
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
Have built custom performance test scripts and integrated them into automated pipelines seamlessly
Apache JMeter has its own pros and cons when compared to other tools. It is easy to use the tool and it has open-source capability so we can build our custom scripts and execute them. It provides other capabilities, such as integrating a database and connecting to other application servers for monitoring and related functions. We use dynamic HTML reporting, which helps us in testing analysis by pinpointing the bottlenecks based on the reports. We can identify the specific areas that need attention, troubleshoot them, and report to the development team. The user-friendly GUI for creating and managing tests makes it very easy to drag and drop samplers. For example, if you want the HTTP sampler, you can drag and drop it and use it. For configurations, we have other samplers. For results, we have the view results samplers that we can also drag and drop. The UI is good in comparison with other tools. Regarding integration with CI/CD pipelines, we can create Apache JMeter scripts and use the Docker image. From the image, whatever scripting we have done can be connected. We can use the CI/CD pipelines and connect them with Jenkins tools and GitHub. Then we can create the pipelines and automate the end-to-end flow. For connecting Jenkins to Apache JMeter, JMeter plugins are available, and we have used them. Apache JMeter also has some third-party plugins, which are not native samplers. If we want to use custom test executions, we definitely use all the different plugins available in Apache JMeter. The capability to simulate users has impacted testing resources and outcomes as Apache JMeter is based on Java, which has a limit to the users in a particular load generator. Apache JMeter provides distributed load testing where you can connect multiple PCs in a master and slave concept, allowing you to pump the load with any number of users. In the past, I have done load testing with 10,000 users by connecting the Apache JMeter distributed network in BlazeMeter. There is a cloud version available, the updated BlazeMeter, and I used that. It is very easy to launch load generators in BlazeMeter, and then we can run the test, scaling up beyond 10,000 users.
Jyoti Ranjan Behera - PeerSpot reviewer
Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies
User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive
I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.
Luis Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba
Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing
ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise56
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise30
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes p...
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and perfo...
What do you like most about Apache JMeter?
I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.
Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to...
What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?
Regarding improvements in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), the initial configuration where w...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

JMeter
Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
SoapUI NG Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, Perforce and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.