Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are leading performance testing tools. NeoLoad has an advantage in cost-effectiveness and user-friendliness, while LoadRunner is preferred for extensive protocol support.
Features: NeoLoad supports quick script generation, API support, and protocol emulation, enhancing testing efficiency. It integrates seamlessly with monitoring tools for improved performance insights. LoadRunner Cloud, with its wide protocol support including HTTP, SAP, and Citrix, facilitates versatile testing for enterprise applications, offering flexible subscription-based pricing to accommodate diverse needs.
Room for Improvement: NeoLoad could enhance protocol support, documentation, and integration with Tricentis products, alongside reporting improvements and interface stability. LoadRunner Cloud users point to its high cost and limited custom reporting options, suggesting improvements in CI/CD integration and regional support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NeoLoad offers hybrid and on-premises deployment models with responsive customer service, although recent transitions have slightly slowed support. LoadRunner Cloud provides straightforward public cloud deployment, yet users desire better regional support. Both tools have commendable technical support with some responsiveness issues.
Pricing and ROI: NeoLoad's pricing is a key strength, providing cost-effective, flexible licensing that caters to various budgets. Despite LoadRunner Cloud's higher price, justified by its comprehensive capabilities, both tools deliver significant ROI through early issue detection and time savings, with NeoLoad offering quicker returns due to its lower cost.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.
The effect of the new license policy is that NeoLoad becomes more and more unattractive for smaller companies, and only bigger companies are interested or find the license fee fair.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
A significant difference is in its depth of analysis.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.
Most graphs can be configured with drag-and-drop, which is handy, and you get graphs suitable for reporting issues.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Tricentis NeoLoad | 13.8% |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 9.2% |
Other | 77.0% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 6 |
Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 4 |
Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
Large Enterprise | 50 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the range of mobile, web, and desktop apps.
Tricentis NeoLoad Features
Tricentis NeoLoad has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Tricentis NeoLoad Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis NeoLoad. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Tricentis NeoLoad stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its price, its user-friendly UX, its API support, and its scalability. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Patrik B., Technical Lead at a tech services company, writes, “The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it.”
A Global Delivery Head at a consultancy firm notes, “The API support is much better with this solution, compared with the competition. Pricing for it is also more affordable than its competitor. We have used Tricentis NeoLoad and we find it scalable.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.