Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

The compared Broadcom and SmartBear solutions aren't in the same category. Broadcom is ranked #2 in SV , and holds a 27.1% mindshare in the category. SmartBear is ranked #21 in FT , and holds a 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...

Read 97 Broadcom Service Virtualization reviews

4,146 Views
2,985 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

3,947 Views
2,487 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Broadcom Service Virtualization and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Broadcom, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization.

To learn more, read our detailed Service Virtualization Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd)

ReadyAPI Test

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (21st), Regression Testing Tools (10th), API Testing Tools (15th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Broadcom Service Virtualization is designed for Service Virtualization and holds a mindshare of 27.1%, down 31.4% compared to last year.
ReadyAPI Test, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 2.3% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.

Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization	27.1%
Parasoft Virtualize	23.6%
OpenText Service Virtualization	16.5%
Other	32.8%

Service Virtualization

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ReadyAPI Test	2.3%
Tricentis Tosca	9.7%
OpenText Functional Testing	7.8%
Other	80.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

DivyaMohan

Senior Project Manager at Infosys

Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance

We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I use VSI, VSM, and SOA testing."

"Thus it saves a lot of my time and if I am using any third-party services, then it saves me money as well."

"We are able to quickly scale our requests. We have tested across thousands of requests. We have had no problems so far."

"The features that I find most useful would be how easy it is to quickly get something up and running as a small test sample."

"We have been able to enact a shift left in our testing, and thanks to CA Service Virtualization we now have the ability to stub services we rely on and can test our own APIs in an efficient manner."

"You have to go check this tool out; the innovation is amazing, as CA has continued to add to the services and transports that it supports and has built all of the enterprise capabilities into the product as well."

"Their support is great."

"The ability to create virtual services and deploy them as Docker containers, and include them in our Jenkins build pipelines, is a valuable feature."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization pros

"The advantage is that the product is handy for testers, user friendly; ability to use load, security tests or create mocks."

"The ability to analyse and simulate web services are clearly the main value."

"I primarily use Soap UI to test XML/JSON requests and responses for APIs hosted by us and our vendors."

"SoapUI is very useful; before we started using SoapUI, we had to do everything manually, which is very time-consuming, and there were a few things we couldn't validate, but using SoapUI made everything easier, you can do six to seven hours of work efficiently, and it's more flexible to use."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code."

"We can test as many APIs as we like, it's very reliable and very easy to understand, anyone can learn it very quickly."

"The solution scales well."

Cons

"Competitors have more user friendly user interfaces and some have front end systems which are easy to toggle and manipulate."

"I think the biggest improvement can come in usability. It's still very complex to use."

"Licensing definitely needs more flexible models. Too many complicated parameters also makes it difficult for us to explain them to our customers."

"I would really like more relevant online documentation."

"HPE ALM integration could be better, especially for exporting, importing, and reusing test cases written in an older version of CA Service Virtualization."

"In terms of stability, I have to restart it every day. We set it on job and we just restart it every day."

"Parsers, look and feel need improvement."

"We need to get more and more types of services because this is a multidisciplinary platform."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization cons

"The application has to be restarted after being used for an hour or so as it stops working after that."

"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

"Better integration capabiliites with a range of Test Management Systems (not that it is not possible using the API) where a range of aspects are considered such as housing of the project, sharing (some capabilities here), versioning of projects, automatic saving of run information and results (again this can be done in test suite setup but would be great to view in a test management system)."

"I have not been able to use this tool a lot of time, so I don't consider myself in a position to say what can really be improved."

"The current interface is unsatisfactory."

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."

"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."

"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."

"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."

"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"The cost is not that bad."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"It is free of charge."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

15%

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

15%

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	98

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	20

Comparisons

Parasoft Virtualize vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 32% of the time

OpenText Service Virtualization vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 16% of the time

ReadyAPI Virtualization vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 11% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Broadcom Service Virtualization

Compared 4% of the time

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 9% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom Service Virtualization

August 2026

Download Broadcom Service Virtualization product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

July 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

Broadcom Service Virtualization enhances testing and development by offering extensive protocol support and the ability to simulate services without hardware, driving efficiency and cost reduction.

Broadcom Service Virtualization allows for the virtualization of web services, MQ, and databases without the need for physical hardware, supporting parallel development and reducing costs. It integrates well with other tools like Jenkins and Selenium, ensuring seamless development processes. The platform supports early testing and mitigates backend dependencies, promoting agility in software development lifecycles. However, improvements in usability, additional technology integrations, better scalability, and comprehensive documentation are desired by users. Enhancements in error messaging and automated testing functionalities are also highlighted as areas for growth.

What are the key features of Broadcom Service Virtualization?

Extensive Protocol Support: Facilitates connection with diverse systems for comprehensive testing.
Quick Simulation Setup: Allows rapid creation of virtual environments for testing.
Customizable Automation: Offers flexible scripting and automation to fit specific testing needs.
Recording Functionalities: Captures service behaviors for detailed analysis and development.
Integration with Tools: Easily connects with Jenkins and Selenium to enhance testing pipelines.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Cost Reduction: Minimizes expenses by eliminating the need for physical hardware.
Early Testing: Enables earlier access to virtual services, enhancing development speed.
Parallel Development: Supports concurrent work streams, improving project timelines.
Dependability Mitigation: Reduces reliance on third-party and mainframe services, stabilizing testing environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing needs, supporting larger and more complex projects.

In industries where early testing and independent development environments are necessary, such as banking, insurance, and telecommunications, Broadcom Service Virtualization is frequently employed. It enables teams to overcome dependencies on non-owned or unreliable services, enhancing development pipelines. This support for performance engineering and agile methodologies ensures that high-traffic APIs and mainframe services are tested under realistic conditions, ultimately facilitating continuous delivery practices.

Broadcom

ReadyAPI Test is a versatile solution for API testing, known for its flexibility, automation, and ease of setup. It efficiently handles SOAP, REST, and JDBC testing, with a user-friendly interface that supports both technical and non-technical teams.

ReadyAPI Test offers robust capabilities in API testing, including functional, load, and security testing. Features such as Groovy scripting, mock services, and data-driven testing enhance workflow efficiency. It integrates well with project environments, supporting script writing and database validation. Teams benefit from easy navigation and comprehensive testing capabilities, making it suitable for IT clients and software test engineers.

What are the main features of ReadyAPI Test?

Groovy Scripting: Enables advanced testing scenarios and custom functions.
Mock Services: Allows simulation of service responses for more dynamic testing.
Data-Driven Testing: Supports testing with diverse data sets for extensive validation.
Integration Capabilities: Enhances project workflows with seamless environment connections.
Load and Security Testing: Provides efficient performance analysis and security checks.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation for both technical and non-technical users.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Streamlined testing processes reduce time spent on manual tasks.
Flexibility: Adapts to varied testing needs and environments easily.
Comprehensive Testing: Supports a full range of API testing types for different protocols.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces long-term costs through automation and efficient operations.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates better team collaboration with integrated tools.

ReadyAPI Test is deployed across industries for automated and manual API testing. It suits industries like IT services, where it assists software test engineers in end-to-end testing scenarios, including email systems and mainframe integration. Organizations utilize it for extensive testing requirements, offering a range of validation methods across project lifecycles.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil,

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Broadcom, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.