Top 10 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

45 reviews
93% willing to recommend

2,032 followers

Top OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, and BlazeMeter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) surpasses its competitors by offering scalable load testing, seamless cloud integration, and robust real-time analytics, enabling streamlined performance testing and effective resource utilization for enhanced application efficiency.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter

3.9 out of 5

Apache JMeter appeals to budget-conscious projects with its cost-free, flexible performance testing. In comparison, LoadRunner Cloud, though pricier, suits large-scale testing with detailed analytics, offering advanced features and professional support, making it ideal for businesses needing comprehensive, scalable solutions.

Download Apache JMeter vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report

Pricing

Apache JMeter offers a cost-effective setup but requires significant manual configuration, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) has a streamlined setup process with higher associated costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis NeoLoad

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis NeoLoad is favored for ease of use, quick scripting, and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those needing mobile testing flexibility. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers comprehensive protocol support and features, making it ideal for complex testing environments with scalability needs despite its higher pricing.

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad offers an economical setup cost, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) tends to have a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Tricentis NeoLoad offers an economical setup cost, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) tends to have a higher initial investment.

BlazeMeter

4.1 out of 5

BlazeMeter

4.1 out of 5

BlazeMeter offers flexible pricing and integration capabilities, ideal for test scalability without infrastructure investments. In comparison, LoadRunner Cloud excels in protocol support and enterprise-level licensing, offering comprehensive features for large-scale testing environments despite higher costs.

Download BlazeMeter vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report

Pricing

BlazeMeter offers a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) requires higher upfront expenses, reflecting its advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle Application Testing Suite

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Application Testing Suite

3.9 out of 5

Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates well within Oracle ecosystems, enhancing automation for Oracle EBS users. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud enables high scalability with cloud options, appealing to businesses seeking flexible, dynamic performance testing without infrastructure limits.

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report

Pricing

Oracle Application Testing Suite incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). This difference highlights a key pricing distinction between the two software solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

k6 Open Source

3.8 out of 5

k6 Open Source

3.8 out of 5

k6 Open Source appeals to budget-conscious teams with its flexible, cost-effective solution and easy CI/CD integration. In comparison, OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers high scalability and detailed analytics, making it ideal for enterprises needing extensive performance metrics and comprehensive customer support.

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. k6 Open Source Report

Pricing

k6 Open Source has no setup cost, providing a budget-friendly solution, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) involves a setup cost, offering advanced features tailored for larger-scale testing projects.

View comparison

Pricing

Appvance AIQ Platform

4.0 out of 5

Appvance AIQ Platform

4.0 out of 5

Appvance AIQ Platform offers AI-driven testing and seamless deployment with cost efficiency. In comparison, OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) provides feature-rich performance testing and cloud scalability, albeit with higher initial costs. Appvance suits quick adoption; OpenText Core caters to advanced testing needs.

Pricing

Appvance AIQ Platform offers a straightforward setup with reasonable costs, while OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) involves a more complex setup process impacting overall expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

RadView WebLOAD

4.1 out of 5

RadView WebLOAD

4.1 out of 5

RadView WebLOAD offers cost-effective pricing with flexible integrative options. In comparison, OpenText Core Performance Engineering LoadRunner Cloud provides advanced analytics and a scalable architecture for complex testing environments. WebLOAD excels in script-reuse capabilities, while LoadRunner Cloud ensures simplified cloud-based deployment and robust support.

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. RadView WebLOAD Report

Pricing

RadView WebLOAD offers a more cost-effective initial setup compared to OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), which has higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

RadView WebLOAD offers a more cost-effective initial setup compared to OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), which has higher setup expenses.

Akamai CloudTest

3.8 out of 5

Akamai CloudTest

3.8 out of 5

Akamai CloudTest is ideal for rapid test creation and execution with its real-time analytics and flexible deployment. In comparison, OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) supports advanced testing scenarios and provides richer analytical insights for enterprises focusing on extensive functionality.

Download Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report

Pricing

Akamai CloudTest offers a lower setup cost compared to OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), making it a budget-friendly option for cloud testing. LoadRunner Cloud, however, provides comprehensive features justifying its initial cost investment.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Engineering Test Management

3.8 out of 5

IBM Engineering Test Management

3.8 out of 5

IBM Engineering Test Management offers ease of integration, while LoadRunner Cloud provides advanced performance features. In comparison, LoadRunner Cloud excels in cloud-based deployment and real-time analytics, making it an attractive choice for organizations prioritizing performance testing. IBM suits those emphasizing integration and workflow management.

Download IBM Engineering Test Management vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report

Pricing

IBM Engineering Test Management features a straightforward setup process that minimizes initial time and cost, whereas OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) offers more extensive setup complexity, potentially impacting initial deployment costs.

View comparison

Pricing

SmartBear LoadNinja

3.7 out of 5

SmartBear LoadNinja

3.7 out of 5

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers advanced testing capabilities and extensive technology support, ideal for complex testing needs. In comparison, SmartBear LoadNinja provides straightforward deployment and cost-effective pricing, appealing to teams seeking ease of use and rapid deployment for web applications.

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. SmartBear LoadNinja Report

Pricing

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers a lower setup cost, making it a more economical choice, while SmartBear LoadNinja incurs a higher setup expense, highlighting significant pricing differences in user onboarding.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Performance Testing Tools

Load Testing Tools

API Testing Tools