IBM DevOps Test UI vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

1,216 Views
707 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,195 Views
975 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,763 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

22nd

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

15th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (8th)

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the market share of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.4% and it decreased by 57.3% compared to the previous year. The market share of ReadyAPI Test is 0.4% and it decreased by 67.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Unique Categories:

Regression Testing Tools

0.4%

API Testing Tools

5.8%

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Aug 15, 2022

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation The solution has provided more accurate results with database verification. Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time. The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework.…

Read full review

Derik Wilson

Software Developer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Oct 11, 2022

This solution saves us thousands of hours and has valuable groovy scripting

The solution saves us a ginormous amount of time. We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours ReadyAPI Test is awesome and a huge time-saver. The groovy scripting is the most valuable feature and it gives us the ability to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours."

"It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly."

"The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on."

"ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code."

"The tool’s scalability is very good."

"The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others."

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

Cons

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards."

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."

"The current interface is unsatisfactory."

"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."

"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"I would like more documentation, training, tutorials, etc. Also, I don't particularly appreciate that I have to save everything. It takes up a lot of space on my laptop, but I have to install the WSDL again If I don't save it."

"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"The cost is not that bad."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational Functional Tester?

Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester?

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Functional Tester?

The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation.

See all answers

What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?

The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would b...

See all answers

Comparisons

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 18% of the time

HCL OneTest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 17% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Postman vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 80% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 9% of the time

ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 3% of the time

Apigee vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 2% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

May 2024

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

June 2024

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

SoapUI NG Pro

Learn More

Video not available

IBM

SmartBear

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

Sample Customers

Edumate

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test

May 2024

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.