

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are key competitors in the performance testing field. LoadRunner Cloud seems to have the upper hand with its streamlined approach and quick deployment features, particularly in cloud environments.
Features:LoadRunner Enterprise offers robust testing capabilities such as comprehensive reporting, flexible scheduling, and seamless integration with Application Lifecycle Management. Its distributed framework supports testing from multiple global locations, allowing for complex scenarios. LoadRunner Cloud is praised for its rapid deployment, user-friendly interface, automatic anomaly detection, and integration with monitoring tools like SiteScope. It simplifies operations by eliminating heavy infrastructure requirements and caters to diverse geographical testing needs.
Room for Improvement:LoadRunner Enterprise can benefit from an improved web-based interface and better third-party tool integrations. Enhanced reporting features and real-time data dashboards are other customer-suggested improvements. For LoadRunner Cloud, users desire more customizable reporting options and improved management of test scripts and settings online. Expanding load pattern support and easier integration with open-source tools would also enhance its usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:LoadRunner Enterprise supports on-premises, private cloud, or hybrid deployments, reflecting its enterprise focus. While customer service is generally satisfactory, the support process can be time-consuming. LoadRunner Cloud, designed for public cloud environments, excels in rapid deployment and scaling. Its customer service is proficient, though response times can vary based on the support plan purchased.
Pricing and ROI:LoadRunner Enterprise’s pricing is substantial due to its comprehensive features and licensing structure, often leading to high costs if not carefully managed. However, it offers considerable ROI through its thorough testing capabilities. LoadRunner Cloud uses a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model, making it cost-effective for variable testing needs despite being higher-priced than open-source alternatives. Both solutions aim to deliver high ROI by identifying potential performance issues early, reducing system downtime, and ensuring reliability during peak operations.
LoadRunner Cloud helps with risk elimination by reducing performance degradation in production, ensuring a better end-user experience.
The ROI is not necessarily cost savings. Sometimes a customer wants to use OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, or it's the only tool that will solve the problem depending on the application.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods.
It's important to note that OpenText has recently taken over Micro Focus.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
It is very scalable, and on the cloud, it's even more scalable, potentially unlimited.
With load generators available, it is easily scalable to meet our needs.
The solution is highly scalable, which is its main feature.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is extremely stable for our use case.
However, it remains quite stable.
The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations.
It would also be convenient if there were options to convert scripts from competitor tools like NeoLoad to LoadRunner.
I expect an improvement in the cloud location offering to better serve local applications, particularly to enhance testing accuracy for users in regions like Thailand.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner.
It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter, which is free.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
A significant difference is in its depth of analysis.
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines.
We can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) | 9.3% |
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.1% |
| Other | 84.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.
OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.
What are the key features?Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.
Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.
What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.