OpenText Functional Testing and ReadyAPI Test cater to the software testing tools market. While OpenText excels in comprehensive compatibility and automation for GUI, API, and business process testing, ReadyAPI is preferred for its ease in API project set-up and API functionalities.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports various environments like Oracle, SAP, and terminal emulators, offering detailed support for flex and web add-ins. It integrates with ALM and boasts strong object recognition, as well as record and playback features. ReadyAPI Test excels in API testing with groovy scripting, ease of test case setups, mock services, and data-driven testing.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing faces slow performance issues, high memory usage, and challenges with object recognition on Chrome and Safari. Users seek better third-party integration, fewer crashes, and reduced costs. ReadyAPI Test users suggest improvements in integration capabilities, support responsiveness, stability, licensing flexibility, and pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing primarily offers on-premises deployment with mixed reviews on customer service, citing slow response and limited support availability. ReadyAPI Test also offers on-premises deployment but generally receives better feedback for prompt and effective customer support, though users desire improved service quality.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is noted for high licensing fees, but it provides good ROI through automation features that lower long-term manual testing costs. Its pricing model is complex. ReadyAPI Test's high pricing is justified by robust API testing features, offering significant ROI by reducing API development and testing time. More flexible licensing could enhance its value.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
