BlazeMeter and Apache JMeter compete in the load testing and performance evaluation category. BlazeMeter appears to have the upper hand due to its robust scalability, cloud-based capabilities, and comprehensive features.
Features: BlazeMeter offers the ability to generate cloud-based load, simulate real-world traffic, and integrate seamlessly with other tools like New Relic and JMeter. Its scalability means it can efficiently handle high concurrent user loads, making it a preferred choice for performance engineers. On the other hand, Apache JMeter provides a cost-effective open-source solution, allowing for easy scripting and flexibility through its extensive plugin offerings. JMeter’s strong community support is beneficial for user-driven enhancements and troubleshooting.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter users note that the pricing structure and performance run scheduling could be improved, along with a need for better load generator provisioning and consistent technical support. Attention is also required for features like server hour calculation and API integration. JMeter faces challenges with handling large loads, GUI responsiveness, and lacks support for modern protocols and parallel testing. Enhanced reporting and an improved user interface are areas that need attention.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter's cloud-based platform makes deployment and scalability straightforward, with users praising its ability to integrate with a variety of tools. While the support team is generally responsive, some users report inconsistency in service quality. Apache JMeter, as an open-source tool, is usually deployed on-premises and may require more technical expertise for configuration and management. Users benefit from a supportive online community but experience limited direct customer service compared to BlazeMeter.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter provides flexible pricing options, though some users find these to be on the expensive side. Despite this, the comprehensive features offered result in a good ROI through increased testing efficiency and improved quality. Alternatively, JMeter's main advantage lies in being a free, open-source tool, which eliminates licensing costs, making it ideal for smaller-scale projects. While BlazeMeter reduces infrastructure costs, JMeter's community-driven approach allows for ongoing enhancement without financial outlay.
With Apache JMeter, I have gained great statistics for performance and server metrics.
Apache JMeter has strong support through its vast Java-based community on platforms like Stack Overflow.
The support for Apache JMeter is excellent.
Apache JMeter relies more on community support.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
This restricts the number of users and necessitates increasing load agents or distributing the script across multiple machines.
JMeter is highly scalable, easily handling increased loads through the use of multiple servers.
For backend automation and performance testing with web services, web APIs, and queue management systems, I would rate Apache JMeter's scalability as between eight and nine.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
JMeter performs exceptionally well, especially in non-GUI mode, which supports high loads efficiently.
Several necessary features still need improvements, specifically in terms of reports and additional functionalities compared to other commercial tools.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
Enabling the conversion of scripts from commercial tools like LoadRunner or NeoLoad into JMeter scripts would also be advantageous.
Apache JMeter could be significantly enhanced by the integration of BDD frameworks.
With BlazeMeter, you can view the results in real-time.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
Using JMeter helps us avoid additional costs for high-load testing since it is open-source and allows for unlimited virtual users at no extra cost.
Apache JMeter is completely free as it is open-source.
It's a cost-effective solution.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
Despite being open source, it offers features comparable to paid tools.
Monetary benefits with Apache JMeter are notable since it doesn’t require a licensed version.
JMeter facilitates scripting capabilities, which include options for Groovy scripts.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java application that tests load and functional behavior and performance in applications. Created initially to test web applications, it has expanded its functionality to test other functions. For instance, you can test a server to see how efficiently it works and how many user requests can be handled simultaneously.
You can use JMeter to test functional performance and regression tests on different technologies. This Java desktop application has an easy-to-use graphical interface which uses the Swing graphical API. You can run JMeter on any environment that accepts a Java virtual machine, such as Windows, Linux, and Mac.
What protocols does JMeter support?
How does JMeter work?
JMeter sends requests to a target server by simulating a group of user requests. Then it collects and calculates statistics on the performance of the target. This target can be a server or an application.
You can test the performance of static resources, such as JavaScript or HTML, and dynamic resources, such as JSP, Servlets, and AJAX. It is also helpful to determine how many concurrent users your website can handle.
There are two main tests you can carry out with JMeter: load test and stress test. The load test models expected usage of a server by simulating multiple users accessing the web server simultaneously. The stress testing aims to find the maximum load capacity of the server or application.
Apache JMeter Key Features
Apache JMeter Benefits
The JMeter extensible core has numerous benefits:
Reviews from Real Users
Stephen B., I.T. Architect, Analyst, and Developer at an educational organization, says, "The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it."
"I like the fact that JMeter integrates well with other tools," adds the Founder and Principal Consultant at a tech services company.
A Quality Engineering Delivery Leader at a financial services firm says, “The performance of the solution is excellent. They have designed the product so that it is very easy to configure. You can basically do anything you like with the product. It's not very restrictive. We like the fact that the technology is open-source.”
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
