We performed a comparison between Adobe Connect and Cisco Meeting Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is straightforward to set up."
"The solution can scale well."
"Screen share and document share are good features."
"The product has valuable communication features. It also has good performance and stability."
"I like Adobe Connect because of its flexibility."
"It trains providers for on-premise deployment in several locations."
"The most critical feature is the POA, but Breakout sessions are definitely my favorite."
"The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server."
"What I like most about Cisco Meeting Server is its quick management. The solution also has a straightforward configuration."
"The UI is user-friendly and very good overall."
"You can use the Cisco Meeting Server to set up conference calls and virtual meetings. Those are the two primary functions of Meeting Server. Most people in the company are using Microsoft Teams, so we only use Meeting Server when we have an internal meeting for all staff."
"Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution."
"Interface and layout options could be improved."
"It needs faster and easier upgrades."
"We encounter issues while connecting headphones via Bluetooth. This particular area needs improvement."
"The price is a problem."
"Adobe's products are difficult to grasp."
"We would like to see support for exportable files that have been uploaded into Adobe Connect as templates for activities."
"Other solutions have more marketing and more visibility. Nobody knows Adobe Connect exists."
"This is a difficult solution to install and it should be made easier."
"In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"A few features are missing on the Meetings app, like a recording function. My understanding is that you need to buy a separate recording solution. It's modular, so you have to enable some functions if you want to use them. For example, we had to enable the Mood function. Recording is the primary feature we'd like to see in the app."
"What would make Cisco Meeting Server better is integrating it with Zoom and Teams so that you can connect or make a call through any of the two third-party solutions."
"Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session."
Adobe Connect is ranked 13th in Virtual Meetings with 10 reviews while Cisco Meeting Server is ranked 8th in Virtual Meetings with 5 reviews. Adobe Connect is rated 8.6, while Cisco Meeting Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Connect writes "User-friendly layout with a nice virtual meeting experience and good reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meeting Server writes "A scalable tool useful to hold conferences and video meetings". Adobe Connect is most compared with GoToMeeting, Zoom, Webex and TeamViewer, whereas Cisco Meeting Server is most compared with Webex, Pexip, Zoom, Skype for Business and Cisco TelePresence. See our Adobe Connect vs. Cisco Meeting Server report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
