Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.4 out of 5

63 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration of network security, advanced threat prevention, and zero-trust access, ensuring comprehensive protection and simplifying IT management for enterprises.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate is favored for robust security features, including comprehensive threat prevention and flexible pricing, enhancing network security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers Zero Trust Network Access and integration advantages, appealing to organizations prioritizing seamless remote access and advanced security.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate has a lower setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more comprehensive initial fee structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate has a lower setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more comprehensive initial fee structure.

Netgate pfSense

4.3 out of 5

Netgate pfSense

4.3 out of 5

Netgate pfSense offers extensive customization and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those with in-house expertise. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in advanced security, centralized support, and simplicity, making it suitable for organizations seeking robust security with straightforward deployment.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netgate pfSense Report

Pricing

Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting its cost-effectiveness. In contrast, Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost can be an investment for those seeking more comprehensive security features.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

4.1 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE offers features like split tunneling and Zero Trust Network Access. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection and integration with Office 365. Buyers may prefer Check Point for networking capabilities or Microsoft for security analytics and integration.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined setup process with minimal costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint might involve higher initial expenses. Harmony SASE's pricing focuses on affordability, contrasting with Defender's potentially steeper upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Secure Firewall

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Secure Firewall excels with comprehensive threat intelligence and efficient deployment, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing network-specific controls and cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless integration and scalability, ideal for organizations seeking expansive security capabilities and cloud-native deployment.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Report

Pricing

Cisco Secure Firewall involves a complex setup process, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more straightforward and cost-effective installation, highlighting a clear difference in ease of deployment and initial cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella

4.4 out of 5

Cisco Umbrella offers advanced DNS-based protection, ideal for companies prioritizing streamlined security management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides comprehensive security with integrated Zero Trust Network Access, appealing to organizations needing robust remote user access and full-stack security measures.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella requires a higher setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Umbrella requires a higher setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

4.3 out of 5

SentinelOne Singularity Complete excels in ransomware protection with advanced AI-driven threat analysis, appealing to those needing strong endpoint security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides robust SaaS integration and broader security, ideal for comprehensive network protection with competitive pricing flexibility.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report

Pricing

SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers straightforward setup without additional costs, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE requires a significant initial setup investment. The pricing structures reflect differing approaches to implementation and cost-effectiveness.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Access offers comprehensive security features and seamless platform integration, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing app traffic protection and performance. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes user-centric security with Zero Trust Network Access and competitive pricing for mid-sized implementations.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation for small to medium enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation for small to medium enterprises.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient offers integrated security features such as VPN and antivirus, suitable for budget-conscious users. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides Zero Trust Network Access and better cloud integration, appealing to organizations needing detailed access controls.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient often involves a lower initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE may require a higher up-front investment. Differences in setup costs can significantly impact budget decisions.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls

4.3 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls

4.3 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer visibility and threat prevention with strong security capabilities and application control, appealing to enterprises needing robust security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on ease of deployment and secure remote access, attracting businesses prioritizing user experience and remote connectivity.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted for higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is recognized for more cost-effective initial pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are noted for higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is recognized for more cost-effective initial pricing.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Harmony SASE offers comprehensive security features like Zero Trust Network Access and Secure Web Gateway for diverse IT ecosystems. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange focuses on cloud-native design and scalability with advanced web filtering and application control, integrating across IDPs seamlessly.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE has a low initial setup cost, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is known for its more complex setup, requiring more investment upfront.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Harmony SASE has a low initial setup cost, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is known for its more complex setup, requiring more investment upfront.

Show 38 more products

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Firewalls