Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo

Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
153 followers
Start review

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Netgate pfSense, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) surpasses its competitors by providing seamless integration with existing infrastructure, advanced threat prevention capabilities, and comprehensive zero-trust network access, ensuring robust security and streamlined connectivity for enterprises.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate is favored for robust security features, including comprehensive threat prevention and flexible pricing, enhancing network security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers Zero Trust Network Access and integration advantages, appealing to organizations prioritizing seamless remote access and advanced security.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report
Fortinet FortiGate has a lower setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more comprehensive initial fee structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate has a lower setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more comprehensive initial fee structure.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense offers extensive customization and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those with in-house expertise. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in advanced security, centralized support, and simplicity, making it suitable for organizations seeking robust security with straightforward deployment.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netgate pfSense Report
Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting its cost-effectiveness. In contrast, Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost can be an investment for those seeking more comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting its cost-effectiveness. In contrast, Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost can be an investment for those seeking more comprehensive security features.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers features like split tunneling and Zero Trust Network Access. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive threat protection and integration with Office 365. Buyers may prefer Check Point for networking capabilities or Microsoft for security analytics and integration.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined setup process with minimal costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint might involve higher initial expenses. Harmony SASE's pricing focuses on affordability, contrasting with Defender's potentially steeper upfront investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined setup process with minimal costs, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint might involve higher initial expenses. Harmony SASE's pricing focuses on affordability, contrasting with Defender's potentially steeper upfront investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall excels with comprehensive threat intelligence and efficient deployment, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing network-specific controls and cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless integration and scalability, ideal for organizations seeking expansive security capabilities and cloud-native deployment.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Report
Cisco Secure Firewall involves a complex setup process, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more straightforward and cost-effective installation, highlighting a clear difference in ease of deployment and initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall involves a complex setup process, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more straightforward and cost-effective installation, highlighting a clear difference in ease of deployment and initial cost.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Umbrella offers advanced DNS-based protection, ideal for companies prioritizing streamlined security management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides comprehensive security with integrated Zero Trust Network Access, appealing to organizations needing robust remote user access and full-stack security measures.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report
Cisco Umbrella requires a higher setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Umbrella requires a higher setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Access offers comprehensive security features and seamless platform integration, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing app traffic protection and performance. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes user-centric security with Zero Trust Network Access and competitive pricing for mid-sized implementations.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation for small to medium enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation for small to medium enterprises.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient offers integrated security features such as VPN and antivirus, suitable for budget-conscious users. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides Zero Trust Network Access and better cloud integration, appealing to organizations needing detailed access controls.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient often involves a lower initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE may require a higher up-front investment. Differences in setup costs can significantly impact budget decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient often involves a lower initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE may require a higher up-front investment. Differences in setup costs can significantly impact budget decisions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers user-centric security features like split tunneling and Citrix SD-WAN integration. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform provides robust data protection and seamless VPN integration, appealing to buyers prioritizing content filtering and data loss prevention.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup process, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform has a more complex initial configuration. Harmony SASE emphasizes ease of deployment and Zscaler focuses on advanced customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup process, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform has a more complex initial configuration. Harmony SASE emphasizes ease of deployment and Zscaler focuses on advanced customization options.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Lookout
3.6 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Lookout
3.6 out of 5
Lookout offers advanced threat defense and endpoint security, ideal for mobile-focused organizations seeking real-time protection. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides extensive Zero Trust Network Access and secure cloud capabilities, appealing to businesses aiming for a comprehensive security suite.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Lookout Report
Lookout's setup costs are competitively priced, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers more premium pricing reflecting its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Lookout's setup costs are competitively priced, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers more premium pricing reflecting its extensive feature set.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in seamless security management with advanced features, including Zero Trust Network Access. In comparison, Cloudflare One offers simplicity with consolidated features like strong DDoS protection, appealing to businesses seeking straightforward yet robust security options.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cloudflare One Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a competitive initial setup cost, while Cloudflare One requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in cost structure for organizations evaluating their SASE solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a competitive initial setup cost, while Cloudflare One requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a notable difference in cost structure for organizations evaluating their SASE solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Iboss offers more competitive pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking efficient security with zero-trust edge services. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE, with its comprehensive feature set and streamlined deployment, attracts those needing integrated threat prevention and advanced endpoint protection for complex security needs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. iboss Report
iboss offers a simple setup process with upfront costs contrasting Check Point Harmony SASE's more intricate implementation but includes a comprehensive onboarding experience.
View comparison
Pricing
iboss offers a simple setup process with upfront costs contrasting Check Point Harmony SASE's more intricate implementation but includes a comprehensive onboarding experience.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Netskope emphasizes flexibility, SaaS governance, and visibility, making it ideal for organizations needing comprehensive application support and integration capabilities. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on centralized management and security unification, appealing to firms seeking a one-platform security solution.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netskope Report
Netskope has a competitive setup cost, which contrasts with Check Point Harmony SASE's slightly higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Netskope has a competitive setup cost, which contrasts with Check Point Harmony SASE's slightly higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels with comprehensive features like Zero Trust and advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Microsoft EOP integrates with Microsoft's ecosystem to prevent phishing and malware, appealing to organizations seeking compliance tools within the Microsoft environment.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) stands out for its robust integration, providing differing advantages in initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) stands out for its robust integration, providing differing advantages in initial setup expenses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
OpenVPN Access Server
4.2 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server is valued for its flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to small projects seeking open-source solutions. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced security for enterprises needing robust features like Zero Trust Network Access and Secure Web Gateway at a premium price.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server features a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers a more comprehensive but costlier initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server features a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers a more comprehensive but costlier initial setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
4.4 out of 5
Cato SASE Cloud Platform provides robust security and seamless traffic optimization, appealing to buyers seeking simplicity and scalability. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on Zero Trust security and adaptive measures, ideal for those prioritizing dynamic security intelligence and remote work adaptability.
Download Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Cato SASE Cloud Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup process, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) incurs higher setup costs, highlighting Cato's competitive advantage in initial affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Cato SASE Cloud Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup process, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) incurs higher setup costs, highlighting Cato's competitive advantage in initial affordability.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Okta Workforce Identity
4.3 out of 5
Okta is favored for identity management with easy integration and automation, ideal for larger organizations. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in security, offering Zero Trust and threat protection, suitable for organizations prioritizing strong security protocols over extensive identity management features.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Okta Workforce Identity Report
Okta Workforce Identity involves a substantial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more economical setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Okta Workforce Identity involves a substantial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more economical setup expense.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Duo excels in user-friendly multi-factor authentication and integration ease, offering diverse security options and simple management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on comprehensive network security through Zero Trust, offering robust VPN solutions and optimizing traffic for multiple devices.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Duo Report
Cisco Duo typically involves lower setup costs, offering nimble deployment, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) may entail higher initial expenses but provides more extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Duo typically involves lower setup costs, offering nimble deployment, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) may entail higher initial expenses but provides more extensive features.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers advanced features like split tunneling and ZTNA, appealing to those prioritizing security and connectivity. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client excels in VPN reliability and integration, catering to organizations focusing on stable remote access and cost-effective solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a competitive setup cost with streamlined onboarding, while Cisco Secure Client's setup cost is more comprehensive, reflecting its extensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a competitive setup cost with streamlined onboarding, while Cisco Secure Client's setup cost is more comprehensive, reflecting its extensive feature set.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
FortiSASE
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
FortiSASE
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels with its extensive security features and user management, appealing to those needing secure connectivity without a full VPN. In comparison, FortiSASE offers efficient deep packet inspection and seamless Fortinet integration, making it attractive for environments already using Fortinet solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. FortiSASE Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE. FortiSASE's initial financial commitment is significant, highlighting the difference in upfront expenses between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE. FortiSASE's initial financial commitment is significant, highlighting the difference in upfront expenses between the two.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
4.1 out of 5
VMware VeloCloud excels in Dynamic Multipath Optimization for link quality and simplifies staging cloud workloads. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes secure connectivity with Zero Trust Network Access, appealing to organizations prioritizing robust security integration and efficient threat protection.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN Report
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN setup costs are higher than Check Point Harmony SASE, offering an advanced network solution, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides a more budget-friendly setup, prioritizing cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN setup costs are higher than Check Point Harmony SASE, offering an advanced network solution, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides a more budget-friendly setup, prioritizing cost efficiency.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels with features like Zero Trust Network Access and centralized management, enhancing security workflows. In comparison, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway provides high performance and simplified connectivity. Harmony SASE presents flexible pricing, while Azure offers competitive pricing for larger infrastructures.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway may involve additional initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway may involve additional initial expenses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Tailscale
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Tailscale
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in offering comprehensive security with a robust zero trust architecture, catering to businesses needing full coverage. In comparison, Tailscale focuses on simplicity and user-friendly peer-to-peer networking, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and straightforward setups.
Check Point Harmony SASE has a competitive setup cost, whereas Tailscale offers a lower initial investment, highlighting a key distinction in cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a competitive setup cost, whereas Tailscale offers a lower initial investment, highlighting a key distinction in cost-effectiveness.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Twingate
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in support and competitive pricing, enhancing ROI. In comparison, Twingate prioritizes secure, direct connections with a feature-rich package. Tech buyers may favor Check Point for comprehensive support and Twingate for streamlined access and efficient security.
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup requiring minimal costs, while Twingate offers a low-cost setup with comprehensive customization options, highlighting a balance between simplicity and personalized configuration in initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup requiring minimal costs, while Twingate offers a low-cost setup with comprehensive customization options, highlighting a balance between simplicity and personalized configuration in initial deployment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Ivanti Connect Secure
3.8 out of 5
Ivanti Connect Secure offers secure access with a focus on VPN technology and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides an integrated platform with advanced scalability and Zero Trust, making it suitable for larger organizations seeking comprehensive security features.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Ivanti Connect Secure Report
Ivanti Connect Secure often involves higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE generally offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Connect Secure often involves higher setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE generally offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Skyhigh Security excels in risk management, shadow IT insights, and DLP integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers Zero Trust Network Access, secure web gateways, and centralized management features. Both provide comprehensive security but cater to different organizational needs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Skyhigh Security Report
Skyhigh Security offers a competitive setup cost for users seeking advanced security features, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides a more economical solution for budget-conscious organizations looking for effective SASE capabilities.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Skyhigh Security offers a competitive setup cost for users seeking advanced security features, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides a more economical solution for budget-conscious organizations looking for effective SASE capabilities.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Appgate SDP excels with dynamic network segmentation and a zero trust model, while in comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE integrates network security and firewall features. Appgate SDP is preferred for customization, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE appeals with its all-in-one, feature-rich security platform.
Download Appgate SDP vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Appgate SDP offers flexible setup costs tailored for scalability, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides transparent and competitive pricing, highlighting a simpler and predictable cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Appgate SDP offers flexible setup costs tailored for scalability, while Check Point Harmony SASE provides transparent and competitive pricing, highlighting a simpler and predictable cost structure.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless VPN and user access management, attractive for organizations needing simplified connectivity. In comparison, ThreatLocker emphasizes zero-trust strategies and application control, appealing to buyers focused on preventing unauthorized software access with comprehensive threat prevention.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting economic differences in initial deployment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting economic differences in initial deployment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
SonicWall Netextender
3.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE provides comprehensive security solutions, offering features like Zero Trust Network Access and Always On VPN. In comparison, SonicWall NetExtender is valued for its affordability and ease of deployment, despite lacking the advanced security and flexibility of Harmony SASE.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. SonicWall Netextender Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has a competitive setup cost, while SonicWall Netextender reports higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a competitive setup cost, while SonicWall Netextender reports higher initial expenses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Citrix Gateway
4.1 out of 5
Citrix Gateway excels in integration and flexible deployment with features like load balancing and dual-factor authentication, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers centralized security with features like Zero Trust and threat prevention, perfect for advanced network protection.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Citrix Gateway Report
Citrix Gateway has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) provides a customizable setup that might incur higher initial expenses due to its flexible configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix Gateway has a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) provides a customizable setup that might incur higher initial expenses due to its flexible configurations.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in cost-effectiveness and integrated security, attracting budget-focused businesses. In comparison, Axis Security's flexible deployment and zero-trust access target those prioritizing advanced security, albeit with higher costs. Both cater to different needs with their distinctive features.
Download Axis Security vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost is competitively lower compared to Axis Security, which offers more comprehensive features at a higher initial price point.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost is competitively lower compared to Axis Security, which offers more comprehensive features at a higher initial price point.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope Private Access
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers centralized management and comprehensive security features, ideal for reducing VPN reliance. In comparison, Netskope Private Access emphasizes architecture that limits lateral movement risks and provides cost-effective user pricing while being easier to deploy across hybrid environments.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netskope Private Access Report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a straightforward setup with clear pricing, while Netskope Private Access involves a more extended installation process with higher initial costs. Users might prefer Check Point for ease of setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a straightforward setup with clear pricing, while Netskope Private Access involves a more extended installation process with higher initial costs. Users might prefer Check Point for ease of setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Forcepoint ONE
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Forcepoint ONE
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in split tunneling, MFA, and fast VPN access, making it efficient and user-friendly. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE focuses on Zero Trust Network Access and remote user protection with web isolation and category-based web access control.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Forcepoint ONE Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which may appeal to businesses with limited budgets, while Forcepoint ONE's offering suggests a more robust initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which may appeal to businesses with limited budgets, while Forcepoint ONE's offering suggests a more robust initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Akamai Enterprise Application Access
4.5 out of 5
Akamai Enterprise Application Access attracts tech buyers with its strong zero-trust focus and praised customer support. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers a comprehensive feature set and cloud-based deployment, appealing to businesses seeking a robust long-term secure access solution.
Download Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81), highlighting a more cost-effective solution for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Enterprise Application Access has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81), highlighting a more cost-effective solution for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
NordLayer
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
NordLayer
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive pricing and robust support. In comparison, NordLayer features greater adaptability and advanced protection, appealing to those prioritizing flexibility. Check Point Harmony SASE's seamless access attracts those seeking a comprehensive security suite, while NordLayer’s enhanced features justify its higher cost.
Check Point Harmony SASE involves a straightforward setup process while NordLayer's setup cost might present a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE involves a straightforward setup process while NordLayer's setup cost might present a more budget-friendly option.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in securing remote work with zero-trust access. In comparison, ConnectWise SIEM offers superior threat detection and analysis. Check Point's cloud-based deployment is user-friendly; ConnectWise provides comprehensive threat management, appealing to those prioritizing security analytics.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ConnectWise SIEM Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined setup with minimal initial costs, while ConnectWise SIEM entails a more complex and potentially higher setup cost, highlighting a distinct difference in the upfront financial investment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a streamlined setup with minimal initial costs, while ConnectWise SIEM entails a more complex and potentially higher setup cost, highlighting a distinct difference in the upfront financial investment required for each solution.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
AWS PrivateLink
3.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
AWS PrivateLink
3.5 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE is known for its competitive pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, AWS PrivateLink is favored for its robust integration capabilities. A tech buyer might choose Check Point for affordability or AWS for its advanced cloud service connections.
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a simpler setup with lower costs, while AWS PrivateLink involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost, making Harmony SASE more budget-friendly in the initial implementation phase.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a simpler setup with lower costs, while AWS PrivateLink involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost, making Harmony SASE more budget-friendly in the initial implementation phase.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
SonicWall Mobile Connect
4.0 out of 5
SonicWall Mobile Connect offers secure access with ease of integration and cost-effective pricing, ideal for small businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides extensive security features, appealing to larger enterprises needing comprehensive protection despite higher upfront costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. SonicWall Mobile Connect Report
SonicWall Mobile Connect has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SonicWall Mobile Connect has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which requires a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cyolo
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cyolo
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers attractive pricing and seamless integration for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cyolo excels in identity-based access control and zero-trust architecture. Check Point provides straightforward deployment, while Cyolo offers detailed guides and robust technical assistance for setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Cyolo, which requires higher initial investment, highlighting differences in entry costs for businesses considering secure access solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Cyolo, which requires higher initial investment, highlighting differences in entry costs for businesses considering secure access solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Absolute Secure Access
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a broad feature set and seamless integration, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Absolute Secure Access emphasizes specialized endpoint control, attracting buyers focused on device compliance despite higher costs and more intricate deployment.
Check Point Harmony SASE has a transparent setup cost, making it straightforward to budget for, while Absolute Secure Access incurs variable setup fees that can increase overall initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a transparent setup cost, making it straightforward to budget for, while Absolute Secure Access incurs variable setup fees that can increase overall initial expenses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Safe-T Secure Application Access
3.9 out of 5
Safe-T Secure Application Access offers secure, tailored solutions with straightforward deployment and personalized support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides a versatile feature set with cloud integration and scalability, suited for long-term strategic investments.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Safe-T Secure Application Access Report
Safe-T Secure Application Access has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which may appeal to budget-conscious users. Check Point Harmony SASE offers more comprehensive initial integration, justifying its higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Safe-T Secure Application Access has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which may appeal to budget-conscious users. Check Point Harmony SASE offers more comprehensive initial integration, justifying its higher setup expense.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Citrix Secure Private Access
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers simplified access and robust security, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Citrix Secure Private Access provides a comprehensive feature set and detailed analytics, making it suitable for enterprises prioritizing extensive capabilities and are willing to invest more upfront.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Citrix Secure Private Access Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to Citrix Secure Private Access, which may appeal to budget-conscious businesses. However, Citrix Secure Private Access offers more robust initial setup features, potentially justifying its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to Citrix Secure Private Access, which may appeal to budget-conscious businesses. However, Citrix Secure Private Access offers more robust initial setup features, potentially justifying its higher cost.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
GoodAccess
4.7 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
GoodAccess
4.7 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers extensive security features with centralized controls. In comparison, GoodAccess provides simple, effective VPN capabilities ideal for smaller teams. Check Point emphasizes wider security integration, while GoodAccess focuses on enhancing user experience and cost-effective solutions for budget-conscious buyers.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. GoodAccess Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has a moderate setup cost, while GoodAccess offers a more economical setup. The pricing difference highlights the affordability of GoodAccess compared to the more robust features of Check Point Harmony SASE.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a moderate setup cost, while GoodAccess offers a more economical setup. The pricing difference highlights the affordability of GoodAccess compared to the more robust features of Check Point Harmony SASE.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Ivanti Neurons for ZTA
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE provides robust security and flexible deployment, appealing to those seeking efficient cost solutions. In comparison, Ivanti Neurons for ZTA offers superior real-time threat detection, attracting tech buyers who prioritize advanced security features despite higher initial costs.
Check Point Harmony SASE has an uncomplicated setup cost structure, while Ivanti Neurons for ZTA involves a higher initial setup expense, highlighting a clear difference in affordability between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has an uncomplicated setup cost structure, while Ivanti Neurons for ZTA involves a higher initial setup expense, highlighting a clear difference in affordability between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Barracuda CloudGen Access
1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE appeals to tech buyers seeking comprehensive security features and advanced threat prevention. In comparison, Barracuda CloudGen Access attracts those prioritizing cost efficiency and fast deployment, valuing its zero-trust access model and seamless integration with existing infrastructures.
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Barracuda CloudGen Access has a more complex setup process and higher initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, whereas Barracuda CloudGen Access has a more complex setup process and higher initial fees.

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Firewalls