No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo

Top 10 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a reviewWhy PeerSpot?

Top Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Cloudflare One. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration, robust security features, and a user-friendly interface, ensuring comprehensive protection and streamlined access for organizations seeking optimal network security solutions.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate's hardware-based security suits buyers needing advanced threat protection and reliable infrastructure. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides flexible, cloud-native solutions ideal for those prioritizing swift deployment and comprehensive security controls for remote access and scalability.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiGate Report
Fortinet FortiGate offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a more complex configuration and higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a more complex configuration and higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexibility and numerous network features, emphasizing Zero Trust. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides robust EDR capabilities with integration into Microsoft ecosystems. Both appeal to distinct security needs, impacting buyer choices based on organizational compatibility.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony SASE, previously Perimeter 81, has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint may involve more complex pricing structures.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE, previously Perimeter 81, has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint may involve more complex pricing structures.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cloudflare One
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers easy VPN configuration and real-time phishing protection, emphasizing user-centric security. In comparison, Cloudflare One provides straightforward DDoS protection and rate limiting, appealing to businesses needing simple, effective security solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cloudflare One Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs, while Cloudflare One provides a more straightforward pricing structure. Harmony SASE is known for flexibility, whereas Cloudflare One emphasizes ease of use.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers competitive setup costs, while Cloudflare One provides a more straightforward pricing structure. Harmony SASE is known for flexibility, whereas Cloudflare One emphasizes ease of use.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
Iboss excels with advanced cloud security and strong compliance management. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers comprehensive security and scalable architecture. Tech buyers choosing iboss may prioritize pricing, while those opting for Check Point value extensive features and long-term ROI.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. iboss Report
iboss has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more comprehensive setup overview.
View comparison
Pricing
iboss has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more comprehensive setup overview.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint combines AI-driven threat detection with robust policy customization, ideal for tackling malware and ransomware threats. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE integrates zero trust access with cloud environments, supporting advanced web security and compliance for enterprises.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers a flexible pricing model, highlighting a strong emphasis on cost differences between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers a flexible pricing model, highlighting a strong emphasis on cost differences between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Secure Firewall is known for its comprehensive security protocols and reliable threat intelligence. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cloud-centric platform with quick deployment and scalable solutions, ideal for businesses transitioning to cloud infrastructure. Both present distinct advantages in network security.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Report
Cisco Secure Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
OPNsense
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in security with Zero Trust Network Access and integrated VPNs, ideal for remote work. In comparison, OPNsense's open-source nature offers flexible firewall capabilities without licensing costs, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking robust protection and configuration flexibility.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. OPNsense Report
OPNsense offers a minimal setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE involves a higher initial expense. This cost difference highlights affordability with OPNsense compared to the more premium pricing of Check Point Harmony SASE.
View comparison
Pricing
OPNsense offers a minimal setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE involves a higher initial expense. This cost difference highlights affordability with OPNsense compared to the more premium pricing of Check Point Harmony SASE.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netgate pfSense
4.3 out of 5
Netgate pfSense is favored for affordability, open-source benefits, and robust firewall and VPN functionalities, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels in advanced security and centralized management, attracting companies prioritizing comprehensive protection and seamless remote access solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netgate pfSense Report
Netgate pfSense offers a cost-effective setup, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE requires a more substantial initial investment. Both solutions cater differently in terms of initial expenses, highlighting a clear distinction in budget allocation.
View comparison
Pricing
Netgate pfSense offers a cost-effective setup, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE requires a more substantial initial investment. Both solutions cater differently in terms of initial expenses, highlighting a clear distinction in budget allocation.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
Okta Platform excels with comprehensive identity management, including Universal Directory and adaptive MFA. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on robust security with Zero Trust Network Access. A tech buyer might choose Okta for identity solutions or Check Point for advanced security features.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Okta Platform Report
The Okta Platform has minimal setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which requires a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The Okta Platform has minimal setup costs compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which requires a more significant initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Sophos Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Sophos Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Sophos Firewall is preferred for its comprehensive security features and cost-effective pricing, appealing to small and medium businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE, focusing on cloud-native security and Zero Trust, attracts firms seeking advanced capabilities in hybrid environments despite its higher cost.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Sophos Firewall Report
Sophos Firewall has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Firewall has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more complex pricing structure.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Umbrella excels with its robust DNS protection and seamless Cisco integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes Zero Trust Network Access. Cisco is known for straightforward network integration, whereas Check Point offers extensive threat prevention and cloud-native capabilities for remote security focus.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Umbrella Report
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) features a more structured pricing model, highlighting the difference in approach between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) features a more structured pricing model, highlighting the difference in approach between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.1 out of 5
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks emphasizes robust security features with seamless Palo Alto ecosystem integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE highlights network security with competitive pricing and excellent customer service, making it appealing for cost-sensitive buyers. Both balance security and deployment ease.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost than Check Point Harmony SASE, making budget considerations essential when evaluating these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost than Check Point Harmony SASE, making budget considerations essential when evaluating these solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers comprehensive security and centralized management for seamless internal resource access. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides cloud-native scalability and advanced security, making it ideal for organizations seeking robust cloud protection with extensive integration capabilities.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost compared to the more premium Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. This cost distinction highlights Harmony SASE as the more budget-friendly option between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a lower setup cost compared to the more premium Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. This cost distinction highlights Harmony SASE as the more budget-friendly option between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Zscaler Internet Access
4.2 out of 5
Zscaler Internet Access offers impressive web filtering, DLP, and threat protection suitable for scalable, cloud-based security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides a unified security platform with centralized management, appealing to enterprises prioritizing integrated security solutions. Both cater to different user needs and preferences.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Zscaler Internet Access Report
Zscaler Internet Access often presents a significant initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) typically offers a more budget-friendly setup. This difference may influence potential users' decision-making based on budgetary constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Zscaler Internet Access often presents a significant initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) typically offers a more budget-friendly setup. This difference may influence potential users' decision-making based on budgetary constraints.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide extensive application visibility and machine learning-based threat prevention for real-time security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers a cloud-native platform with Zero Trust Network Access and secure web gateways for comprehensive access solutions in cloud environments.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls Report
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls generally feature a higher initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) often provides a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls generally feature a higher initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) often provides a more cost-effective setup option.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
WatchGuard Firebox is noted for its ease of VPN setup and comprehensive feature set, ideal for those seeking on-premises solutions. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE excels with its cloud-native approach, offering zero-trust capabilities and centralized management for more extensive network needs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
WatchGuard Firebox is known for its lower setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a broader feature set despite a higher initial setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WatchGuard Firebox is known for its lower setup cost while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a broader feature set despite a higher initial setup investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
4.5 out of 5
Cato SASE Cloud Platform supports versatile deployments and quickly achieves ROI, appealing to those prioritizing quick cost recovery. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes zero trust and secure access, ideal for organizations seeking robust security features, despite its higher price point.
Download Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a potentially more complex pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE presents a potentially more complex pricing structure.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Netskope excels with its CASB and DLP features, offering cost-effective cloud integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers Zero Trust and secure gateways, appealing to larger organizations despite higher costs. Tech buyers choose Netskope for affordability and Check Point Harmony SASE for comprehensive features.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Netskope Report
Netskope's setup cost is higher compared to Check Point Harmony SASE's more affordable pricing. Check Point Harmony SASE offers lower initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective setup advantage over Netskope.
View comparison
Pricing
Netskope's setup cost is higher compared to Check Point Harmony SASE's more affordable pricing. Check Point Harmony SASE offers lower initial expenses, highlighting a cost-effective setup advantage over Netskope.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Meraki MX
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Meraki MX
4.2 out of 5

Cisco Meraki MX enhances network security and management with cloud-based SD-WAN and centralized troubleshooting. Popular in hospitals, telecommunications, and retail, it supports seamless VPN, guest Wi-Fi security, and multiple site management. Users appreciate advanced security, real-time dashboards, and robust performance but desire improved customization and integration options.

Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Meraki MX Report
The Meraki UTM is excellent when you buy the Advanced Security license. If you buy a different license you lost all the valuable functions.
It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput.
View comparison
Pricing
The Meraki UTM is excellent when you buy the Advanced Security license. If you buy a different license you lost all the valuable functions.
It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint excels in machine learning-powered threat detection and ransomware defenses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides Zero Trust Network Access and VPN features. Both solutions deliver solid ROI but differ in integration capabilities and pricing flexibility.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
Intercept X Endpoint offers competitive setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE's setup expenses are more premium, reflecting their emphasis on advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Intercept X Endpoint offers competitive setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE's setup expenses are more premium, reflecting their emphasis on advanced security features.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiClient excels with seamless FortiGate integration, focusing on robust endpoint protection and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE prioritizes Zero Trust Network Access, offering advanced security management suitable for remote work, despite potential complexity and higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
Fortinet FortiClient has a minimal initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) presents a higher setup expense, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations between these two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiClient has a minimal initial setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) presents a higher setup expense, highlighting a key difference in cost considerations between these two cybersecurity solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in endpoint security with low resource usage and integration with Windows. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless connectivity and a unified management console with robust security, making it suitable for larger enterprises despite its higher cost.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward setup cost structure, while Check Point Harmony SASE entails a more complex setup cost scheme.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward setup cost structure, while Check Point Harmony SASE entails a more complex setup cost scheme.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Duo offers ease of use and effective MFA, making it ideal for seamless user experience and security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced threat prevention and centralized management, appealing to those needing a comprehensive, secure access solution with cloud-native features.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Duo Report
Cisco Duo has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Check Point Harmony SASE incurs a higher initial expense due to complex implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Duo has a straightforward setup cost structure, while Check Point Harmony SASE incurs a higher initial expense due to complex implementation.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Azure Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Azure Firewall
3.8 out of 5
Azure Firewall integrates well with Azure services, offering robust security features like threat intelligence and URL filtering but lacks features for larger enterprises. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides a comprehensive SASE solution with Zero Trust but faces challenges in policy management.
Download Azure Firewall vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Azure Firewall's setup cost is lower compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, providing a more budget-friendly option, while Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost reflects its advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Firewall's setup cost is lower compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, providing a more budget-friendly option, while Check Point Harmony SASE's setup cost reflects its advanced security features.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series
4.3 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series offers advanced threat intelligence and centralized management, ideal for app-centric security. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE integrates zero-trust security and centralized management, appealing to buyers seeking unified secure access with comprehensive threat handling in cloud-native environments.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series Report
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series generally has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more affordable setup option. This cost difference can affect budgeting considerations for organizations choosing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series generally has a higher initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more affordable setup option. This cost difference can affect budgeting considerations for organizations choosing between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
OpenVPN Access Server
4.2 out of 5
OpenVPN Access Server offers affordability with open-source flexibility, ideal for small businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced security features and centralized management, catering to organizations prioritizing comprehensive protection. Both solutions support cloud deployments, fitting different budgetary and security needs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report
OpenVPN Access Server has a lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE. Harmony SASE offers advanced integration features, potentially justifying a higher initial investment relative to OpenVPN Access Server.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenVPN Access Server has a lower initial setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE. Harmony SASE offers advanced integration features, potentially justifying a higher initial investment relative to OpenVPN Access Server.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
VirusTotal
4.4 out of 5
VirusTotal offers robust threat detection with cost-efficient deployment, appealing to organizations focused on threat analysis. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides comprehensive network security features and integrated deployment, suiting those seeking a complete secure access service edge and efficient network management solution.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. VirusTotal Report
VirusTotal has no setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) includes setup expenses, highlighting a cost difference in initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
VirusTotal has no setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) includes setup expenses, highlighting a cost difference in initial implementation.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform
4.6 out of 5
Harmony SASE is ideal for seamless access and integration, particularly in cloud-native environments. In comparison, ThreatLocker excels in granular application control and visibility. Harmony's quick deployment contrasts with ThreatLocker's user-friendly interface, while both ensure competitive pricing with substantial ROI.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform Report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers competitively priced setup costs, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform tends to have higher initial investment requirements, marking a difference in the setup cost approach between these two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers competitively priced setup costs, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform tends to have higher initial investment requirements, marking a difference in the setup cost approach between these two security solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.1 out of 5
Skyhigh Security excels in Zero Trust Access and flexible cloud features, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing integration and scalability. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes ease of deployment and centralized management, attracting buyers focusing on simplified security operations across distributed environments.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Skyhigh Security Report
Skyhigh Security offers competitive setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing the cost difference.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Skyhigh Security offers competitive setup costs, while Check Point Harmony SASE requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing the cost difference.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
4.1 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels in providing comprehensive cloud-native security with features like Zero Trust Network Access and a centralized console. In comparison, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection focuses on email security, benefiting from its strong integration with other Microsoft products.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has no setup cost, which may appeal to budget-conscious users, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection requires a minimal setup fee, highlighting their differing approaches to initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has no setup cost, which may appeal to budget-conscious users, whereas Microsoft Exchange Online Protection requires a minimal setup fee, highlighting their differing approaches to initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
4.1 out of 5
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN excels in application performance with features like DMPO and zero-touch provisioning. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on security with offerings such as ZTNA. Buyers seek VeloCloud for connectivity and Harmony SASE for enhanced security solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN Report
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN involves a moderate setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference for businesses considering these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN involves a moderate setup cost, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a significant cost difference for businesses considering these two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
JumpCloud
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
JumpCloud
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE integrates multiple security functions with centralized management for improved visibility and control. In comparison, JumpCloud provides comprehensive device and user management with SSO and policy management, streamlining authentication. Buyers may prefer Check Point for security features or JumpCloud for flexible pricing.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. JumpCloud Report
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup with a lower initial cost, whereas JumpCloud has a modestly higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup with a lower initial cost, whereas JumpCloud has a modestly higher setup cost.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Secure Access
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE, with its Zero Trust Network Access and Unified Cloud-Native platform, appeals to those seeking integrated security tools. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access attracts buyers with robust policy management and AI-driven features, ideal for complex, varied networks.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Access Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers lower setup costs, providing a cost-effective entry point, while Cisco Secure Access provides a higher initial setup cost for enhanced scalability and features, highlighting a stark difference in their initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers lower setup costs, providing a cost-effective entry point, while Cisco Secure Access provides a higher initial setup cost for enhanced scalability and features, highlighting a stark difference in their initial investment requirements.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Appgate SDP
4.4 out of 5
Appgate SDP offers dynamic access provisions and a strong pricing model for secure networks. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE combines SD-WAN, zero trust, and threat prevention features, appealing to those needing comprehensive security despite higher initial costs.
Download Appgate SDP vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
Appgate SDP has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting a more premium approach, while the latter offers a more cost-effective entry point for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Appgate SDP has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, highlighting a more premium approach, while the latter offers a more cost-effective entry point for businesses.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Tailscale
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Tailscale
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE provides extensive security features like Zero Trust Network Access, ideal for robust infrastructures. In comparison, Tailscale, emphasizing ease of use, offers affordable, quick deployment with features like MagicDNS, appealing to cost-conscious buyers requiring simple security solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Tailscale Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup process, reducing setup costs, while Tailscale provides a minimal cost entry with its simplified configuration, highlighting a key difference in setup expense between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup process, reducing setup costs, while Tailscale provides a minimal cost entry with its simplified configuration, highlighting a key difference in setup expense between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Fortinet FortiGate-VM
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate-VM excels in flexible deployment and cost-effective security features. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers enhanced remote security and central management. Fortinet’s pricing benefits varied needs, while Check Point is ideal for enterprises seeking advanced security integrations.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Fortinet FortiGate-VM Report
The Fortinet FortiGate-VM setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its robust security features, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, focusing on streamlined implementation and cloud-native security options.
View comparison
Pricing
The Fortinet FortiGate-VM setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its robust security features, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, focusing on streamlined implementation and cloud-native security options.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
FortiSASE
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
FortiSASE
3.9 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers advanced security features like Zero Trust Network Access and centralized management, ideal for remote work. In comparison, FortiSASE provides an affordable, feature-rich solution, especially beneficial for existing Fortinet customers, with competitive network and security services.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. FortiSASE Report
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup cost model, whereas FortiSASE includes variable initial expenses, highlighting potential cost savings and budgeting predictability with Check Point Harmony SASE compared to the higher variability of FortiSASE setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE features a straightforward setup cost model, whereas FortiSASE includes variable initial expenses, highlighting potential cost savings and budgeting predictability with Check Point Harmony SASE compared to the higher variability of FortiSASE setup costs.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma SD-WAN
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma SD-WAN
4.2 out of 5
Prisma SD-WAN offers intuitive features and strong integration, ideal for enterprises needing dynamic routing and traffic shaping. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE provides advanced security and Zero Trust Network Access, suiting organizations focused on deep security integrations and remote work support.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma SD-WAN Report
Prisma SD-WAN has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, making it a more economical choice for initial implementation. However, the pricing difference reflects varying features and capabilities between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma SD-WAN has a lower setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, making it a more economical choice for initial implementation. However, the pricing difference reflects varying features and capabilities between the two solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)
4.2 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers comprehensive security with features like Zero Trust and real-time threat intelligence, appealing for cloud-native deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, provides ease of use and variety in licensing, suitable for organizations needing reliable and traditional VPN solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) Report
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) setup costs are moderate, whereas Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) setup costs are relatively higher, highlighting a notable difference in initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) setup costs are moderate, whereas Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) setup costs are relatively higher, highlighting a notable difference in initial financial commitment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma Access Browser
4.0 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE offers cost-effective threat protection for SMBs, while Prisma Access Browser provides advanced security and extensive analytics. In comparison, Prisma Access Browser ensures seamless integration and extensive support, whereas Harmony SASE ensures straightforward deployment with competitive pricing.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Prisma Access Browser Report
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Prisma Access Browser presents a more complex pricing structure that could influence initial budgeting considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Prisma Access Browser presents a more complex pricing structure that could influence initial budgeting considerations.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
4.1 out of 5
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is favored for its robust SSL VPN and customization, ideal for large enterprises needing extensive security features. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE offers seamless integration and ease of use, attracting businesses seeking comprehensive cloud-based security with simpler deployment.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Report
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a substantial upfront investment for setup, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option, creating a notable contrast between these two access solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) requires a substantial upfront investment for setup, whereas Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option, creating a notable contrast between these two access solutions.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
ConnectWise SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers cloud security focusing on secure access, ideal for seamless remote work. In comparison, ConnectWise SIEM excels in detailed security analytics, appealing to those seeking advanced threat detection despite potentially higher initial costs due to its robust features.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. ConnectWise SIEM Report
Check Point Harmony SASE setup cost is generally lower compared to ConnectWise SIEM. ConnectWise SIEM's setup involves more extensive resources, making it potentially costlier and more complex than Check Point Harmony SASE.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE setup cost is generally lower compared to ConnectWise SIEM. ConnectWise SIEM's setup involves more extensive resources, making it potentially costlier and more complex than Check Point Harmony SASE.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
4.0 out of 5
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge emphasizes network performance and flexibility, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on security features, making it suitable for businesses prioritizing data protection despite potentially higher costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Report
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform setup costs are competitive, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a straightforward setup expense structure, highlighting a contrast in pricing transparency.
View comparison
Pricing
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform setup costs are competitive, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) offers a straightforward setup expense structure, highlighting a contrast in pricing transparency.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
MetaDefender
4.3 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
MetaDefender
4.3 out of 5
MetaDefender excels in threat prevention and offers cost-effective pricing with streamlined deployment. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE features comprehensive security for remote access and networking, with a scalable cloud-based setup offering significant ROI despite higher upfront costs.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. MetaDefender Report
MetaDefender setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly setup, suitable for cost-sensitive deployments.
View comparison
Pricing
MetaDefender setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Check Point Harmony SASE offers a more budget-friendly setup, suitable for cost-sensitive deployments.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Aryaka Unified SASE Platform
1 out of 5
Aryaka Unified SASE Platform supports secure remote access, providing reliable connectivity and security integration. Valuable features include cloud management and analytics. Users note room for improvement in customization options to better fit varied requirements. It excels in enhanced network performance and simplified administration.
View comparison
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
4.0 out of 5
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management offers capabilities like session management and real-time alerts, ideal for centralized control. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on Zero Trust Network Access and threat prevention, providing a unified security platform suitable for comprehensive cloud integration.
Download BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Report
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point Harmony SASE, which offers a more affordable initial setup.

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Firewalls