

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the network security category. Palo Alto seems to have an upper hand due to its better visibility into network traffic and intuitive threat prevention features, while Harmony SASE is highlighted for ease of management and Zero Trust Network Access.
Features: Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls offer application-based security, intuitive threat prevention, and machine learning capabilities that enhance visibility and flexibility. Check Point Harmony SASE provides Zero Trust Network Access, easy cloud environment deployment, and centralized management to ensure strong security with ease of management.
Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could improve in terms of affordability, support, and better reporting tools. Users also seek enhancements in scalability and integration. Check Point Harmony SASE requires better initial configuration, improved integration with identity providers, and enhanced reporting analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are detailed in configuration and offer tiered support, though setup can be complex. Check Point Harmony SASE is noted for straightforward deployment in cloud environments and user management but could improve its response times and customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are relatively high-priced, recognized for significant ROI in critical environments. Check Point Harmony SASE is more cost-accessible, offering competitive pricing and flexibility, appealing to businesses looking for strong security at a lower cost.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
The solution helped reduce downtime, which is crucial in time-sensitive industries like manufacturing.
I have seen a return on investment as there are definitely clear cost reductions, resource savings, time savings, and improved risk detection.
Since we moved to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, we enabled the ECMP, and we were able to move some traffic over the second ISP, with most of the traffic going via the primary ISP.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
Palo Alto's network support is excellent, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
They offer fast and competent assistance.
They provide fast response and rapid remediation of problems.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
It is important to assess the infrastructure size before choosing a model.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are scalable and reliable.
They are able to secure data centers consistently across all workplaces, from the smallest office to the largest data centers.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
With appropriately configured policies, these firewalls can provide robust network security.
After the upgrade, we are experiencing performance issues.
I have not experienced any outages or issues.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
When performance degrades due to full packet inspection, the solution should be to increase the computing power within the same firewall, not to recommend upgrading to a larger, more expensive model.
Further integration into a unified system could improve usability.
Configurations related to different operating systems can be complex, and we have encountered issues with Linux systems.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are expensive.
Colleagues looking for the cheapest and fastest firewall can still use Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls because they are affordable.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is the most expensive solution without discussion.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are DNS sync calls, enabled security features, and Wildfire.
Threat Vault allows us access to a comprehensive threat database, enabling us to get detailed information on threats and how to mitigate them.
The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is Cortex Data Lake.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls | 5.3% |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 1.1% |
| Other | 93.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 77 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 56 |
| Large Enterprise | 89 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly known as Perimeter 81, offers advanced security through Zero Trust Network Access and centralized management that supports seamless remote operations and hybrid infrastructures.
Check Point Harmony SASE provides organizations with a robust platform for securing remote operations and hybrid infrastructure. It integrates cloud and on-premise networks, featuring centralized management for efficient policy control and real-time threat monitoring. With integration capabilities like Citrix SD-WAN, remote branch implementations become straightforward. Network access is secured by advanced anti-phishing and URL filtering. A user-friendly interface combined with strong customer support enhances management while promoting productivity.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?For industries managing remote operations, Check Point Harmony SASE is instrumental in securing connectivity across cloud and on-premise networks. By unifying access control, it allows employees worldwide to securely connect to corporate resources, be it from home, public locations, or through various Wi-Fi connections.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced security with features like machine learning threat prevention and centralized management, ensuring protection across network environments.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are structured to enhance security by engaging users with machine learning for real-time threat prevention, comprehensive application and user visibility, and secure VPN connections. They work seamlessly with SIEMs and cloud services, providing centralized management through Panorama for diverse environments. Despite high pricing and configuration complexity, they are instrumental for organizations aiming to secure network perimeters, data centers, and cloud environments effectively.
What key features define Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls?Organizations across industries rely on Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls to secure network perimeters with advanced threat prevention features. They are deployed extensively for application-level visibility, managing internal network segmentation, and securing VPN connections. These firewalls play a crucial role in implementing zero trust security and integrating with other security tools to offer comprehensive protection.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.