


Check Point Harmony SASE and Cisco Secure Client compete in the network security market. Check Point Harmony SASE has the upper hand due to its robust feature set and comprehensive security approach.
Features: Check Point Harmony SASE provides Zero Trust Network Access, a centralized management console for policy control, and a secure web gateway to block unauthorized content. Its real-time threat intelligence enhances security, while detailed threat prevention and user control capabilities strengthen its offering. Cisco Secure Client, with AnyConnect, offers secure remote access emphasizing reliable connection stability and essential VPN functionalities.
Room for Improvement: Check Point Harmony SASE could improve integration with third-party identity providers and make its management portal more intuitive for managing multiple sites. Enhancing analytics and real-time threat detection is also needed. Cisco Secure Client can optimize system resource use and improve auto-reconnect features. Better integration with other security applications could enhance user-friendliness for less technical users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Harmony SASE is noted for its easy deployment across cloud and on-premises systems, with flexible setup options and strong customer support, though response times could improve. Cisco Secure Client is praised for straightforward deployment, often in on-premises settings, but users face slow support responses and complex licensing terms. Check Point Harmony is recognized for excellent technical support, effectively resolving issues.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point Harmony SASE may be priced higher than some competitors, but its advanced features justify the cost, providing value with its multi-layered security. Pricing for Cisco Secure Client is considered expensive, but its VPN capabilities offer reasonable ROI. Both solutions deliver significant security returns, with Harmony SASE's competitive pricing being mixed due to high costs for smaller companies and licensing minimums.
Centralized security management allows our team to monitor users, manage policies, and investigate security events from one place.
With iboss, whenever you turn on your laptop, the iboss agent automatically connects to the iboss cloud, enforcing all security policies. So with respect to the security side, it strengthens measures.
Deploying iboss leads to good return on investment, estimated around 70% to 80%.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
With Cisco Secure Network Analytics implemented, we have achieved collaboration as an IT support team where we reached out to network-related members to understand how they work on Cisco Secure Network Analytics-related issues.
The quality of the support is fantastic.
We had promising discussions about resolving these issues, but no real action followed.
They do not always reply promptly, but they do try and genuinely want to help us.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
Cisco offers very high-quality customer service.
Cisco technical support is difficult, and it requires lots of contracts.
Over the years, there's been a decline in the quality, mainly in areas such as the experience level of support engineers and the time taken to address and escalate issues.
They are also able to meet on-demand requirements based on your contract with them, and can easily provide adequate resources and scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
If I start seeing sluggishness or anything like that, I just reach out to my rep, and they connect with their dev team, typically resolving it the same day.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
A smaller firewall can handle fewer sessions, while a larger one can handle tens of thousands of sessions.
The scalability of Cisco Secure Client depends on the hardware I choose.
Regarding scalability, Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) rates as excellent because we can scale out by simply buying more licenses from the vendor.
It's been pretty solid; I've never had an outage with them, and if I ever had, it's only been once out of the seven years.
Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device despite our ClearPass sending information to the iboss box.
I give them full marks for presales and support during the pilot phase, as well as support when we actually went live.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
I would rate the stability ten out of ten.
The stability is really good, and I would rate it up to nine.
Regarding the performance of Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect), I have not seen any issues because performance-wise it functions properly.
iboss's single pane of glass console gives centralized visibility into web traffic, user activity, security policies, and alerts from one dashboard.
Better onboarding documents would make the first week easier for new users.
Enhanced policy management, providing smart alerts with root cause context, and improving support with better troubleshooting documents are crucial areas.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
I am using Intune for deployments, and it's not easy to create an automated deployment where users do not need to register server addresses.
Vendors offer more features, such as a kill switch.
Cisco's security portfolio, including Secure Client and the firewalls, is falling behind.
The following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern.
during that time, the Blue Coat proxies we were using were costly, as Blue Coat was acquired by Symantec, and then Symantec was acquired by Broadcom, which increased costs.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
Palo Alto and Fortinet provide free VPN connections, but Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) requires a license purchase.
I perceive the pricing to be a seven, however, I have perpetual licenses.
The pricing seems to align equally with other competitors like Palo Alto during a competitive situation.
It's given us a lot more visibility into our computer assets that may be infected with viruses and also shows us people who have unusually large uploads or might be engaging in high-risk activities, such as searches or going to sites not categorized by their web crawler.
iboss was the best solution for us because, no matter what domain you were in, everything is under a single pane of glass, which is exactly what we wanted.
Because of the points of presence, there is no downtime for us. I can move users to different points of presence, so I experience minimal to zero downtime.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
Beneficial for businesses needing secure access outside the office.
Additionally, it gives the user flexibility of working from anywhere, which is a major feature we are looking at.
Cisco Secure Network Analytics filled the gap between the monitoring and management side, allowing us to check end user activity clearly from the Cisco Secure Network Analytics console.


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 28 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
iboss is the Zero Trust SASE platform that gives organizations complete visibility and governance over their AI, data, and applications through one unified platform, one console, one policy engine, and one data lake.
Your endpoints may already stop malware. Your data and application activity can still be invisible. iboss decrypts and understands every connection, then turns that signal into answers security leaders can act on.
The platform leads with three capabilities in this order: AI Security and Visibility, Data Security and Visibility, and App Visibility and Control. Zero Trust Network Access, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN sit underneath as the access fabric that carries those three. Trusted by global enterprises and government agencies.
What are the most important features of Iboss?
- AI Security and Visibility: conversation capture, shadow-AI discovery, AI DLP, and agent governance across Claude, Co-Work, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok, and emerging services.
- Data Security and Visibility: full SSL/TLS decryption, deep content inspection, MIP label compliance, and one-click compliance reporting.
- App Visibility and Control: signatureless CASB, dual risk scoring, in-app controls, and SSPM for major SaaS.
- Containerized Zero Trust SASE: dedicated containers, isolated SSL keys, one console, one policy engine, one data lake.
- Access fabric: ZTNA, VPN replacement, and SD-WAN under the same platform.
What benefits should users consider in reviews?
- Complete visibility over AI, data, and applications from one platform instead of separate point tools.
- Encrypted traffic is inspected by default so data decisions use content and context together.
- Shadow SaaS and new web tools appear as they are used, with enforceable controls in one console.
- Native data sovereignty through dedicated containers, in-region inspection, and per-customer SSL key custody.
- Scale proven in published materials: 10M+ users, 100+ countries, 150B+ transactions, 2.5B+ threats blocked.
Economic buyers are CISOs, CIOs, and VPs of Security. Champions include security architects, network and infrastructure leaders, SecOps, and GRC. Primary segments: enterprise and business, financial services, government (including FedRAMP Gov Cloud), healthcare, manufacturing, legal and professional services, retail and hospitality, and MSP/MSSP partners. Education, including K-12, is one vertical among these.
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly known as Perimeter 81, offers advanced security through Zero Trust Network Access and centralized management that supports seamless remote operations and hybrid infrastructures.
Check Point Harmony SASE provides organizations with a robust platform for securing remote operations and hybrid infrastructure. It integrates cloud and on-premise networks, featuring centralized management for efficient policy control and real-time threat monitoring. With integration capabilities like Citrix SD-WAN, remote branch implementations become straightforward. Network access is secured by advanced anti-phishing and URL filtering. A user-friendly interface combined with strong customer support enhances management while promoting productivity.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?For industries managing remote operations, Check Point Harmony SASE is instrumental in securing connectivity across cloud and on-premise networks. By unifying access control, it allows employees worldwide to securely connect to corporate resources, be it from home, public locations, or through various Wi-Fi connections.
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) provides reliable, secure VPN connectivity for remote access, integrating seamlessly with existing enterprise infrastructure and offering quick setup and scalability.
Cisco Secure Client, featuring AnyConnect, is recognized for its robust VPN capabilities, enabling secure remote access from anywhere, thanks to strong encryption and multifactor authentication. It offers seamless integration with Active Directory and other vendors for enhanced security and protection. Users value its scalability, whether for small teams or large enterprises, along with ease of setup. However, feedback suggests improvements are needed in auto-connection to VPNs, better licensing visibility, and simplified authentication processes. Modernizing its interface and configuration along with less frequent updates are also highlighted.
What are the key features of Cisco Secure Client?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is implemented to facilitate secure remote work environments. It ensures healthcare data confidentiality, supports financial services' compliance requirements, and maintains secure, consistent connectivity for tech companies' global operations. Organizations rely on its integration capabilities to work alongside firewalls, enhance security measures, and ensure secure access to critical resources, tools vital for productive collaboration and communication.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.