Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the SASE market. Cato takes the lead in connectivity and SD-WAN capabilities, while Check Point is preferred for its advanced security functions.
Features: Cato SASE Cloud Platform incorporates SD-WAN with a cloud-native solution, self-healing networks, centralized management, and rapid threat response. In contrast, Check Point Harmony SASE focuses on strong security features like a Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access along with DLP facilities that integrate well with existing network infrastructures.
Room for Improvement: Cato could benefit from enhancing security features like intrusion detection and expanding third-party integration capabilities. Check Point needs better integration with identity providers and more user-friendly analytics and reporting features. Both solutions can improve multi-language support and management portal performance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cato's cloud-native design allows straightforward integration, supported by a global network of PoPs enhancing speed and reliability. Check Point offers hybrid cloud options for seamless deployment. Cato's customer support is noted for its quick response, whereas Check Point could improve its management query handling.
Pricing and ROI: Cato is viewed as cost-effective due to its comprehensive features and potential MPLS cost reduction, delivering substantial ROI. Check Point offers competitive pricing for both small and large enterprises but may be less affordable for smaller organizations due to minimum license requirements. Both products demonstrate significant ROI with their diverse offerings.
We have been able to retire legacy appliances such as traditional VPN concentrators and on-prem proxies, which cut costs and reduced maintenance overhead.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
Their knowledge portal and Cato Academy portal are excellent resources.
Our customer service experience is excellent
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
The support team needs to be more effective and responsive to clear issues more promptly.
As an MSSP, we find it scalable for end users across EPP platforms, network, and cloud sides.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
I would rate the stability of the solution as ten on a scale of one to ten.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
The platform lacks strong security features on the edge.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
We would appreciate more granular reporting and analytics, including better drill-down capabilities to investigate specific users or app activity.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
The pricing is flexible due to our special partnership with Cato Networks.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
It is a bit expensive.
It is scalable for end users across network and cloud sides and saves operational costs.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
Cato Networks is a leading SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) platform, combining SD-WAN and network security to obtain a cloud-native service. Cato Networks optimizes and secures application access for users and identities. The platform delivers a next-generation secure networking architecture that minimizes legacy IT infrastructures’ complexity, costs, and risks. The goal of Cato Suite is to connect any user to any application securely and optimally.
Cato Suite runs on a private global network of more than 65 PoPs (points of presence) connected via SLA-backed network providers. The service can connect branches, data centers, users, and clouds. Cato can be deployed in stages to augment legacy network services.
Cato Suite delivers end-to-end route optimization for WAN and cloud traffic. The architecture is self-healing, enabling a high service uptime.
Cato Features
Cato Cloud has a global backbone to deliver a reliable, global network. Here are some key SD-WAN features of Cato Cloud.
What challenges does Cato Network solve?
MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) networks are usually expensive and limited in their capacity. Cato simplifies migrating to a faster, higher-capacity internet and SASE cloud. Cato SD-WAN appliances enable customers to improve usable capacity and resiliency.
Customers who suffer from the challenge of high latency and network inconsistency can use Cato to deliver a consistent connection and user experience to access on-premises and cloud applications.
Cato’s complete network security stack connects all branch locations to the Cato cloud, therefore protecting all traffic, both internet-bound and WAN, with enterprise-grade, cloud-based security services. This capability avoids having to backhaul internet traffic to a data center or hub or having to implement stand-alone cloud security solutions.
Organizations using Cato notice an acceleration of cloud traffic. Cato achieves this by routing all traffic from the edges to the PoP closest to the data center. Because of the close distance between the two, the latency is near zero.
Reviews from Real Users
An IT manager/project coordinator at a healthcare company says that “[Cato is] a cloud-based solution that integrates well with everything. They are the classic SaaS solution.”
Yeong-Gi L., a network engineer at Snetsystems, notes that “The solution is very stable. The scalability is quite good. Technical support was always helpful and responsive. The integration capabilities are not a problem at all.”
"The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features," says Lorenzo S., senior solutions consultant Lead at MDI.
Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based network security and software-defined perimeter (SDP) solution designed to provide secure access to resources in the cloud, data centers, and on-premises environments. It offers a unified platform for organizations to manage and secure their network infrastructure, regardless of the location or type of resources.
Perimeter 81 Benefits:
Perimeter 81 Features:
Reviews from Real Users
PeerSpot user, Frontend Developer at Limelight Networks, states that "We use some VPN solutions, and Perimeter 81 has the best user experience for desktop or mobile".
Daniel Goldfeld, Vice President of Customer Success at Mine - The All-in-One Privacy Suite, says that Perimeter 81 has "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions".
Another PeerSpot user, Accounts Payable Specialist at Simera, writes that "The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."
We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.