

Netgate pfSense and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the network security category. Check Point Harmony SASE appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and overall value.
Features: Netgate pfSense is valued for its reliability, flexibility, and strong firewall capabilities. Check Point Harmony SASE is praised for its comprehensive security measures, ease of integration, and cloud-native features.
Room for Improvement: Users of Netgate pfSense suggest improvements in its scalability, reporting features, and documentation. Check Point Harmony SASE reviews point out a need for better documentation, enhanced performance, and improved interface design.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netgate pfSense is noted for its straightforward installation and reliable customer support. Check Point Harmony SASE receives positive feedback for its seamless deployment and proactive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Netgate pfSense is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and reasonable ROI. Check Point Harmony SASE has higher initial costs but is considered worth the investment due to its expansive feature set and long-term benefits.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
Compared to what we were doing with Sophos, it provides a great value financially and in terms of time savings.
I have seen a return on investment with cost savings after implementing Netgate pfSense, as other firewalls would cost me lakhs of rupees while pfSense is free.
We have been saving by having a stable, well-known product.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
When we're down, that's $8000 an hour on a $1500 firewall.
The support is prompt and effective, making it well worth the investment.
Even when they're in the middle of deploying a new version, I've reached out and received a download link within five minutes.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
The next step up now is to the 4100, which gives you an additional preconfigured WAN port that allows you to easily separate networks.
Netgate doesn't come anywhere close to the scalability that its competitors do.
Due to the absence of a single pane of glass management feature, scaling out pfSense becomes quite challenging.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
Netgate pfSense rates a 10 for stability, and I have experienced no issues there.
Otherwise, I've never seen one have a problem. It's just rock solid.
It has been running for four years now without any issues.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
I need to speak to someone immediately.
You could add AI for troubleshooting with Netgate pfSense because it will be easier for new engineers.
I would like to have the ability to control all my devices from one place.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
The cost of the 3500 was closer to $4,000.
I don't always seek the cheapest or most expensive option but rather the best value for my investment.
The total cost of ownership is very low.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
pfSense's flexibility is great. If you don't have the money to buy the NetGate hardware, anything works with it. You can toss it on any low-end piece of hardware or virtualize it if you choose to virtualize it.
We have multiple VLANs, and with assistance, it was easy to get everything set up and running in our organization the way we needed it to.
We had downtime before pfSense. We've never gone down using the solution.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Netgate pfSense | 7.4% |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 1.1% |
| Other | 91.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 171 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 33 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly Perimeter 81, offers robust security features like split tunneling, MFA, and Zero Trust Network Access focused on secure remote access and optimized connectivity for remote teams.
Check Point Harmony SASE delivers advanced security through a user-friendly interface, efficient VPN connections, and a centralized management console. It enhances security with real-time threat intelligence from ThreatCloud and traffic management via built-in optimization. Firewall as a Service and Secure Web Gateway safeguard against unauthorized access and phishing. While users seek enhanced networking customizations and better integration with identity providers, there's an emphasis on improving reporting, real-time analytics, and policy management. Requests also include a Chrome extension, traffic balancing, and simplified configuration to address some resource-intensive aspects.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?
How can organizations benefit from using Check Point Harmony SASE?
Check Point Harmony SASE is used across industries for secure remote access and connectivity, protecting sensitive data, and managing access to corporate resources. It is ideal for those with hybrid cloud models and requires comprehensive security measures combined with existing IT infrastructures to meet specific industry demands.
Netgate pfSense is an open-source firewall and router software known for scalability, cost-effectiveness, and community support. It includes customizable packages for varied network management needs, offering solid performance and straightforward management for diverse setups.
Netgate pfSense provides an impressive range of functionalities including firewall capabilities, VPN options, and extensive customization through packages. Its low resource usage and high availability make it viable for businesses of all sizes, especially when dealing with tailored network demands. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in ease of use, mobile compatibility, and support for plug-ins. Enhanced centralized management, better documentation, and additional security features are frequent requests.
What are the key features of Netgate pfSense?In education and healthcare, Netgate pfSense is employed for secure connectivity and efficient traffic management, accommodating distinct demands of remote access and content filtering. Organizations in these sectors often utilize features such as load balancing and VPNs to maintain secure and reliable network operations while integrating with services like Active Directory for streamlined identity management. Small to medium-sized enterprises benefit from its affordability and robust functionality, making it a go-to choice for managed service environments requiring effective network security and control.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.