

WatchGuard Firebox and Check Point Harmony SASE compete in the network security category. WatchGuard Firebox appears to have an edge due to its simpler setup and cost-effectiveness, while Check Point Harmony SASE excels in comprehensive security features and centralized management, making it ideal for hybrid and cloud environments.
Features: WatchGuard Firebox offers ease of setup, effective VPN capabilities, and strong reporting features. The user-friendly GUI enhances management and configuration, integrating with various systems easily. Check Point Harmony SASE provides a centralized management console, Zero Trust Network Access, and a Secure Web Gateway, further supplemented by data loss prevention and integration with threat intelligence sources for secure access in diverse environments.
Room for Improvement: WatchGuard Firebox needs better third-party integration, more granular feature screens, and streamlined navigation to enhance user experience. Improved reporting intuitiveness and better monitoring are also desired. Check Point Harmony SASE can refine its complex initial setup, improve security infrastructure integration, and simplify management for less technical users. Enhanced threat prevention analytics and remote user connectivity options are also needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WatchGuard Firebox is acclaimed for deployment assistance and responsive customer service, excelling in hybrid and on-premises settings. Check Point Harmony SASE offers adaptability across cloud environments with commendable customer service but may require more fine-tuning during setup.
Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard Firebox offers competitive pricing, suitable for smaller to medium businesses, with users noting significant ROI through reduced management time. It provides transparency in licensing. Check Point Harmony SASE, while more expensive, offers value through its feature-rich security package, fit for organizations needing robust solutions, and provides flexible licensing despite a higher initial investment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
From a security standpoint, preventing even a single major security incident or prolonged outage can represent significant cost savings.
I do not see any return on investment after WatchGuard Firebox implementation in terms of cost reductions.
Reduced incidents and easier management helped lower operational cost.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
People working really hard, listening to every issue and request, and replying within hours.
On a scale of one to 10, I would rate the technical support of the WatchGuard Firebox a 10.
When comparing WatchGuard Firebox with other vendors such as Fortinet, SonicWall, Palo Alto, and Sophos, WatchGuard Firebox performs competitively.
Most of the time, support engineers are knowledgeable and able to assist effectively with firewall configuration issues, VPN troubleshooting, firmware updates, and security-related concerns.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
Check Point Harmony SASE's scalability is good; it can handle growth easily, allowing me to easily add another region and gateway to have more people join in.
Overall, WatchGuard Firebox offers strong scalability for SMBs, MSPs, branch offices, and hybrid environments while keeping deployment and management relatively straightforward.
The user interface and features compared to newer firewalls are not up to the mark, which includes functionalities such as filtering, web filtering, threat protection, user identity, and UTM features that need improvement.
You can choose different models based on throughput and features, which makes it easy to support growing environments.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
Check Point Harmony SASE is stable most of the time, but there are still some issues that are hard to troubleshoot.
I have just one WatchGuard Firebox unit that is licensed, and I have no bugs on it, so I am happy with that.
Once properly configured, the platform handles VPN connectivity, traffic inspection, and security services constantly, even in multi-site environments with remote users.
There are issues with traffic hitting the firewall, which could indicate performance problems related to throughput.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The product is lacking features that other competitors have, making it quite challenging to migrate customers to this solution because it feels very much unfinished.
It gives good visibility and control over the traffic, and the UI makes it easy to manage policies and respond quickly when something comes up.
Some improvements in threat intelligence integrations and SIEM integration as an out-of-the-box context would be beneficial.
The cost for renewal after three years is 75% of the hardware cost, which is a significant problem.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
The cost is a bit expensive for most users.
It is a bit expensive.
When we tried to renew the Palo Alto license, the cost was beyond any reasonable range.
Fortinet is more expensive than WatchGuard.
I find WatchGuard Firebox to be cost-effective.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) feature is a major highlight as it gives users seamless and secure access to internal resources without requiring a full-blown VPN, which improves both security and user experience.
The Zero Trust and segmentation have helped my team and our customers significantly because we are able to protect every scope and allow the work-from-home users to access internal resources while passing through a threat prevention gateway, ensuring that everything is safe.
The Firebox offers valuable features such as network security, URL filtering, UTM features, intrusion prevention and detection, and authentication.
The features of WatchGuard Firebox are most valuable for maintaining network security.
Some of the best features of WatchGuard Firebox in my experience are its ease of management, strong VPN capabilities, and integrated security services.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| WatchGuard Firebox | 1.9% |
| Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) | 1.1% |
| Other | 97.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 104 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 30 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Check Point Harmony SASE, formerly known as Perimeter 81, offers advanced security through Zero Trust Network Access and centralized management that supports seamless remote operations and hybrid infrastructures.
Check Point Harmony SASE provides organizations with a robust platform for securing remote operations and hybrid infrastructure. It integrates cloud and on-premise networks, featuring centralized management for efficient policy control and real-time threat monitoring. With integration capabilities like Citrix SD-WAN, remote branch implementations become straightforward. Network access is secured by advanced anti-phishing and URL filtering. A user-friendly interface combined with strong customer support enhances management while promoting productivity.
What are the key features of Check Point Harmony SASE?For industries managing remote operations, Check Point Harmony SASE is instrumental in securing connectivity across cloud and on-premise networks. By unifying access control, it allows employees worldwide to securely connect to corporate resources, be it from home, public locations, or through various Wi-Fi connections.
WatchGuard Firebox offers robust network security features including VPN, intrusion prevention, and centralized management, streamlining protection processes for businesses. Its reliability and flexibility make it a competitive choice for managing security in different environments.
WatchGuard Firebox is geared toward businesses seeking comprehensive threat prevention and management with features like network segmentation, cloud integration, and user-friendly interfaces. Users appreciate its centralized visibility and stable performance. While it integrates well with Active Directory and offers geolocation services, users often point to the need for improved policy management and faster customer support. Its deployment may require attention to detail, yet it remains a preferred option for many sectors due to its efficiency and competitive cost.
What are the most valuable features of WatchGuard Firebox?WatchGuard Firebox serves as a primary tool in industries like healthcare, education, and business by offering key functions such as firewall and remote access security. Its application control and web filtering features are essential for data protection and compliance, enabling different sectors to manage network requirements efficiently.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.