ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
ScienceLogic | 1.8% |
Zabbix | 12.2% |
Datadog | 5.2% |
Other | 80.8% |
Type | Title | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
Category | IT Infrastructure Monitoring | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | ScienceLogic vs Zabbix | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | ScienceLogic vs Datadog | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
Comparison | ScienceLogic vs Auvik Network Management (ANM) | Sep 9, 2025 | Download |
Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Veeam Data Platform | 4.3 | N/A | 94% | 429 interviewsAdd to research |
Dynatrace | 4.4 | N/A | 95% | 350 interviewsAdd to research |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 12 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 17 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 138 |
Midsize Enterprise | 59 |
Large Enterprise | 506 |
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
---|---|---|
CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd | 3.0 | No summary available |
Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy | 4.5 | I use ScienceLogic as a strategic monitoring tool for infrastructure and applications; it's reliable and scalable but needs better UI flexibility and support responsiveness. Integration with ServiceNow improved alerts, though setup and template application remain manual. |
Chief Architect - Cloud Xperienz Platform - CIS Technology Office at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech | 4.5 | I use ScienceLogic for hybrid monitoring, benefiting from its Python customization, business service mapping, and automation features. Its integration and automation capabilities enhance efficiency. Although professional services are often needed, it offers significant value in time and cost savings. |
Solution Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I primarily use ScienceLogic for monitoring infrastructure and management. The CMDB update and Skyler.AI features are valuable. However, better integration of observability and APM monitoring is needed. I also use other automation tools, like Ansible, due to broader automation capabilities. |
IT Infrastructure Manager at a real estate/law firm with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | No summary available |
Administrative Assistant at First Rand Bank Ltd. | 3.0 | I use ScienceLogic to monitor servers and DNSs. It offers valuable infra-monitoring with alerts, but it lacks a deep infrastructure view and API features. While better than Nagios, it's not user-friendly and requires knowledge to use effectively. |
IT Enterprise Architect at Capgemini | 3.5 | No summary available |
CEO at Parker Digital | 4.5 | No summary available |