ScienceLogic and IBM Turbonomic operate in the IT monitoring and optimization category. ScienceLogic has a slight advantage in customization and multi-tenancy, while IBM Turbonomic stands out for its automation and resource optimization capabilities.
Features:ScienceLogic offers granular permissions, integration with various systems, and tailored solutions for video conferencing needs. It supports extensive monitoring across devices and simplifies management of multiple clients with its multi-tenancy capabilities. IBM Turbonomic focuses on automation and optimization of IT resources by providing actionable insights to automate workloads, enhance efficiency, and ensure availability, particularly excelling in real-time monitoring and forecasting with its ability to adjust resources automatically.
Room for Improvement:ScienceLogic users seek a simpler interface, enhanced reporting, and better integration with external platforms. Additionally, improvements in SNMP trap processing and API expansions are desired. IBM Turbonomic could improve its user interface for easier usability, better refine cloud and Kubernetes integrations, and offer more detailed reporting along with improved resource resizing recommendations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ScienceLogic provides robust customer service and technical support, earning commendation for responsiveness and support options for both on-premises and private cloud deployments. IBM Turbonomic offers ease of deployment on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, with customer service that addresses user needs promptly, although some indicate a need for better support interactions. ScienceLogic slightly edges out due to its personalized customer engagement.
Pricing and ROI:ScienceLogic's device tier pricing can be costly as device count increases, but its extensive capabilities are considered a valuable investment for large enterprises, demonstrating positive ROI through operational efficiency gains. IBM Turbonomic's flexible pricing on a per-socket or per-VM basis makes it competitively priced, with quick ROI through optimized resource allocations, helping reduce hardware needs. Both products offer adaptable pricing that suits different organizational requirements, seen as worthwhile investments.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
It could be cheaper.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
IBM Turbonomic | 1.1% |
ScienceLogic | 4.6% |
Other | 94.3% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 41 |
Midsize Enterprise | 57 |
Large Enterprise | 147 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 13 |
Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
Large Enterprise | 24 |
IBM Turbonomic offers automation, planning, and right-sizing recommendations to streamline resource management, improve efficiencies, and optimize costs across virtualized environments and cloud platforms.
IBM Turbonomic is valued for its capability to optimize resource allocation and monitor virtual environments efficiently. It facilitates automated decision-making in VM sizing, load balancing, and cost optimization for both on-premises and cloud deployments. Users can leverage insights for workload placement, ensure peak performance assurance, and effectively right-size across VMware and Azure. The ongoing transition to HTML5 aims to improve visual and navigational ease, while expanded reporting features are anticipated. Opportunities for improved training, documentation, and integrations enhance platform usability and functionality.
What Are the Key Features?In finance, IBM Turbonomic aids in maintaining platform efficiency during market fluctuations. Healthcare organizations leverage its capability for resource optimization during high-demand periods to enhance patient care support. Retailers use it for planning in peak seasons, ensuring resources align with fluctuating demand to maintain performance continuity.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.