ScienceLogic and Nagios XI are both network monitoring solutions aiming to provide comprehensive IT infrastructure management. ScienceLogic appears to have the upper hand for its ease of use and automation capabilities, while Nagios XI is favored for advanced features and customization despite higher costs.
Features: ScienceLogic offers an all-in-one monitoring platform that integrates seamlessly with various systems, strong cloud and on-premise capabilities, and valuable automation and integration features. Nagios XI is noted for its flexibility, extensive customization options, and technical depth, which often requires more manual configuration.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve in reporting functionalities, expand third-party integrations, and stabilize the analytics module. Nagios XI needs a more modern interface, better documentation, and easier configuration processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic users praise its straightforward deployment process and strong customer support for efficient issue resolution. Nagios XI's deployment is seen as more complex due to customization requirements, but it has a responsive support team.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's setup cost is perceived as reasonable with good ROI thanks to its comprehensive feature set and automation capabilities. Nagios XI is more expensive, with users feeling its extensive features justify the cost, though it can negatively impact overall ROI.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
If the user interface isn’t presenting data well, it becomes difficult to manage when scaling.
It is very stable.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
Many tools have poor user interfaces, making them hard to manage and navigate.
The GUI could be improved. It's a bit too basic.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
We are using the free, open-source version.
The pricing for the Nagios XI product is good and better than other solutions.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Nagios XI simplifies our setup and reduces the time spent configuring monitoring tools.
The alerting system is very effective.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Nagios XI provides monitoring of all mission-critical infrastructure components, including applications, services, operating systems, network protocols, systems metrics, and network infrastructure. Third-party add-ons provide tools for monitoring virtually all in-house and external applications, services, and systems.
Nagios XI uses a powerful Core 4 monitoring engine that provides users with the highest levels of server monitoring performance. This high degree of performance enables nearly limitless scalability and monitoring powers.
With Nagios XI, stakeholders can check up on their infrastructure status using the role-based web interface. Sophisticated dashboards enable access to monitoring information and third-party data. Administrators can easily set up permissions so users can only access the infrastructure they are authorized to view.
Nagios XI Benefits and Features
Some of the benefits and top features of using Nagios XI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Nagios XI stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its integration options and monitoring abilities, as well as its alerting features.
David P., a senior DevOps engineer at EML Payments Ltd, writes, “We use Nagios as a network discovery tool. We use Nagios to maintain our uptime statistics and to monitor our services. It has allowed us to be much more sophisticated in our monitoring and alerting.”
An IT-OSS manager at a comms service provider notes, “Nagios XI has a custom API feature, and we can expose custom APIs for our integration. This is a great feature.”
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
