Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Wazuh Logo

Top 10 Wazuh Alternatives

Vendor: Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Wazuh Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Wazuh based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Dynatrace, and Microsoft Sentinel. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Wazuh surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive security analytics, real-time threat detection, and an intuitive, centralized management interface, providing unmatched versatility and integration capabilities that enhance enterprise-level security across diverse IT infrastructures.

Wazuh Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Wazuh, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Wazuh Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced EDR features with lightweight resource use and remote analysis, suitable for large-scale deployment. In comparison, Wazuh offers a cost-effective, open-source solution with strong log monitoring, ideal for budget-conscious environments prioritizing flexibility and community-driven support.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Wazuh Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive security features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-conscious users seeking essential security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive security features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-conscious users seeking essential security measures.
Wazuh Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers extensive automation and AI-driven insights for complex IT environments. In comparison, Wazuh provides robust security features. Dynatrace excels in customer support and deployment, while Wazuh's open-source model appeals to budget-conscious buyers seeking customizable security without comprehensive performance features.
Download Dynatrace vs. Wazuh Report
Dynatrace presents a higher initial setup cost, offering extensive features, while Wazuh provides a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability and essential capabilities. The difference lies in the financial entry point and feature set offered by each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace presents a higher initial setup cost, offering extensive features, while Wazuh provides a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability and essential capabilities. The difference lies in the financial entry point and feature set offered by each solution.
Wazuh Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel integrates deeply with Microsoft's AI-enhanced ecosystem, optimizing threat detection and automation for Azure environments. In comparison, Wazuh, as an open-source tool, offers adaptable configuration and strong SIEM functionalities, suitable for varied environments without licensing fees.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Wazuh Report
Microsoft Sentinel's setup cost can be significant, offering a comprehensive enterprise-level solution, while Wazuh presents a more cost-effective setup, appealing to smaller businesses with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Sentinel's setup cost can be significant, offering a comprehensive enterprise-level solution, while Wazuh presents a more cost-effective setup, appealing to smaller businesses with budget constraints.
Wazuh Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog provides expansive monitoring capabilities and integrations that cater to cloud environments, making it suitable for advanced data handling. In comparison, Wazuh excels in security features with file integrity and compliance monitoring, attractive for cost-effective, open-source security-focused deployments.
Download Datadog vs. Wazuh Report
Datadog's setup costs are straightforward with transparent pricing, while Wazuh offers a no-cost open-source solution, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are straightforward with transparent pricing, while Wazuh offers a no-cost open-source solution, appealing to budget-conscious users seeking cost efficiency.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and data integration, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Wazuh offers cost-effective AWS integration and file monitoring, suitable for budget-conscious users. Splunk supports diverse deployments, while Wazuh requires more manual setup but saves on cost.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Wazuh Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup option.
Wazuh Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels with AI-driven threat detection and autonomous response, offering ROI through threat mitigation. In comparison, Wazuh provides cost-free log monitoring but requires more extensive configuration efforts. A tech buyer might choose Darktrace for advanced AI and Wazuh for budget-conscious solutions.
Download Darktrace vs. Wazuh Report
Darktrace typically incurs higher setup costs, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace typically incurs higher setup costs, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete leverages AI for advanced threat detection with rollback functionality, ideal for tech buyers seeking robust security. In comparison, Wazuh offers cost-effective intrusion detection and vulnerability management, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly solutions with essential features.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. Wazuh Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete incurs a premium for setup, emphasizing comprehensive security features, while Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on open-source flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete incurs a premium for setup, emphasizing comprehensive security features, while Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup, focusing on open-source flexibility.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender XDR offers extensive threat detection with seamless Microsoft integration, ideal for ecosystems requiring depth in automation and analytics. In comparison, Wazuh provides a cost-effective solution focused on compliance and logging with flexibility for on-premise deployment and scalability.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. Wazuh Report
Microsoft Defender XDR involves a significant setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more affordable initial setup. Microsoft Defender XDR's pricing reflects its comprehensive features, contrasting with Wazuh's cost-efficient approach with fewer advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender XDR involves a significant setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more affordable initial setup. Microsoft Defender XDR's pricing reflects its comprehensive features, contrasting with Wazuh's cost-efficient approach with fewer advanced capabilities.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar provides robust security insights with advanced features and scalability. In comparison, Wazuh offers a cost-effective, open-source alternative, emphasizing compliance and monitoring, appealing to organizations seeking lower initial investment while sacrificing some advanced functionalities.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Wazuh Report
IBM Security QRadar's setup costs are generally higher due to complex implementation, while Wazuh offers a more affordable setup with a simpler deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar's setup costs are generally higher due to complex implementation, while Wazuh offers a more affordable setup with a simpler deployment process.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR offers robust endpoint protection with advanced threat detection, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive security. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source flexibility and cost-effective solutions attract businesses seeking affordable compliance and log management, with emphasis on cloud compatibility and integration options.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Wazuh Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks often involves higher setup costs compared to Wazuh, reflecting its advanced features and comprehensive threat detection capabilities. Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to organizations with limited financial resources seeking effecti...
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks often involves higher setup costs compared to Wazuh, reflecting its advanced features and comprehensive threat detection capabilities. Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to organizations with limited financial resources seeking effecti...
Wazuh Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security excels in threat hunting and visualization with machine learning and robust customization, appealing to varied environments. In comparison, Wazuh's SIEM capabilities and cloud service integration provide real-time monitoring and compliance, particularly benefiting small to medium enterprises seeking cost-effective solutions.
Download Elastic Security vs. Wazuh Report
Elastic Security typically has a higher setup cost, focusing on enterprise-level functionality, while Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup ideal for small to medium businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security typically has a higher setup cost, focusing on enterprise-level functionality, while Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup ideal for small to medium businesses.
Wazuh Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Wazuh offers robust security features with strong integration capabilities, appealing to security-focused businesses. In comparison, Grafana Loki provides a user-friendly dashboard and log management, attracting organizations that prioritize simplicity and cost-effectiveness for straightforward solutions.
Download Grafana Loki vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh offers a low setup cost, while Grafana Loki incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh offers a low setup cost, while Grafana Loki incurs higher initial expenses.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Elastic Observability excels in log analytics and application performance monitoring with scalable architecture. In comparison, Wazuh focuses on security functionalities, particularly in endpoint monitoring and incident response. Elastic serves large enterprises, while Wazuh is cost-effective for open-source security needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Wazuh Report
Elastic Observability offers straightforward setup costs compared to Wazuh, which provides a more complex but customizable setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Observability offers straightforward setup costs compared to Wazuh, which provides a more complex but customizable setup process.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform provides robust enterprise-level security with features like central management and data encryption. In comparison, Wazuh is an affordable, open-source option excelling in file integrity and logging, appealing to budget-conscious organizations requiring strong community support and cost-effective security measures.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. Wazuh Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which is known for its lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which is known for its lower initial investment.
Wazuh Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Graylog Enterprise is favored for its ease of deployment and intuitive service options. In comparison, Wazuh excels in security features and ROI. Graylog is ideal for advanced log management, whereas Wazuh appeals to those prioritizing comprehensive security insights and efficient cost management.
Download Graylog Enterprise vs. Wazuh Report
Graylog Enterprise has a more structured setup cost compared to Wazuh's flexible options. Wazuh offers a more customizable installation process, while Graylog ensures a straightforward implementation approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Graylog Enterprise has a more structured setup cost compared to Wazuh's flexible options. Wazuh offers a more customizable installation process, while Graylog ensures a straightforward implementation approach.
Wazuh Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Wazuh offers robust threat detection and compliance management, appealing to those seeking integrated SIEM and XDR solutions. In comparison, Security Onion provides strong network-centric functionalities, making it ideal for deep packet analysis. Tech buyers might prefer Wazuh for its simplicity or Security Onion for comprehensive network security.
Download Security Onion vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh has a lower initial setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Security Onion may require a higher investment upfront but offers extensive features that justify the expense for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh has a lower initial setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Security Onion may require a higher investment upfront but offers extensive features that justify the expense for some users.
Wazuh Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Trend Vision One
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One offers robust security with centralized visibility and AI-enhanced protection suited for complex environments. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source platform provides cost-effective solutions with flexible deployment, making it ideal for budget-conscious organizations seeking customizable and efficient security options.
Download Trend Vision One vs. Wazuh Report
Trend Vision One’s setup cost is efficient, while Wazuh offers a competitive arrangement with potentially lower upfront expenses. Users may consider cost differences when evaluating these security solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One’s setup cost is efficient, while Wazuh offers a competitive arrangement with potentially lower upfront expenses. Users may consider cost differences when evaluating these security solutions.
Wazuh Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform excels in network access control, providing flexibility and robust integration, though high costs and interface complexity are limitations. In comparison, Wazuh offers strong compatibility and cost-effectiveness but lacks Forescout's advanced controls and requires improvements in threat intelligence integration.
Download Forescout Platform vs. Wazuh Report
Forescout Platform has a high setup cost, focusing on advanced features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option with easier deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform has a high setup cost, focusing on advanced features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option with easier deployment.
Wazuh Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Vectra AI
4.3 out of 5
Vectra AI excels in advanced threat detection and integration, beneficial for teams prioritizing genuine threats. In comparison, Wazuh offers open-source log management and compliance, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Vectra AI requires less user effort, while Wazuh caters to customizable deployments.
Download Vectra AI vs. Wazuh Report
Vectra AI involves a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers cost-effective implementation, presenting a notable difference in initial investment for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Vectra AI involves a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers cost-effective implementation, presenting a notable difference in initial investment for users.
Wazuh Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightIDR appeals with advanced threat detection and automation, ideal for seamless integration and professional support. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source model offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, attracting those prioritizing budget-friendly options and community-driven assistance.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Wazuh Report
Rapid7 InsightIDR features a simpler setup process, while Wazuh is recognized for its cost-effective implementation. InsightIDR's ease comes at a premium, contrasting with Wazuh's budget-friendly yet more complex installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightIDR features a simpler setup process, while Wazuh is recognized for its cost-effective implementation. InsightIDR's ease comes at a premium, contrasting with Wazuh's budget-friendly yet more complex installation.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
Intercept X Endpoint offers advanced EDR, anti-ransomware features, and centralized management appealing to environments needing comprehensive protection. In comparison, Wazuh provides open-source SIEM, intrusion detection, and log management, ideal for cost-effective, customizable solutions.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. Wazuh Report
Intercept X Endpoint offers a competitive setup cost, while Wazuh provides a budget-friendly alternative, highlighting affordability differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Intercept X Endpoint offers a competitive setup cost, while Wazuh provides a budget-friendly alternative, highlighting affordability differences.
Wazuh Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM offers advanced intelligence and reporting, ideal for environments needing thorough security analysis. In comparison, Wazuh's integration with various systems and open-source nature appeals to budget-conscious organizations prioritizing affordability and flexibility over advanced real-time monitoring features.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Wazuh Report
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Wazuh Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
Wazuh offers cost-effectiveness through its open-source model and integration abilities, appealing to budget-conscious users. In comparison, Elastic Stack provides advanced search and analytics capabilities, ideal for users needing comprehensive data insights, despite its higher cost.
Download Elastic Stack vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh offers a lower setup cost compared to the Elastic Stack, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, the Elastic Stack may involve higher upfront expenses, influencing the total cost of ownership.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh offers a lower setup cost compared to the Elastic Stack, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, the Elastic Stack may involve higher upfront expenses, influencing the total cost of ownership.
Wazuh Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet offers mobile control, malware blocking, and extensive visibility, appealing to those needing advanced detection. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source, cloud integration, and logging features suit budget-conscious buyers seeking flexibility and robust compliance.
Download Cynet vs. Wazuh Report
Cynet requires an initial setup cost, whereas Wazuh offers a free setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet requires an initial setup cost, whereas Wazuh offers a free setup.
Wazuh Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSIEM integrates security and network operations with comprehensive analytics, ideal for large organizations. In comparison, Wazuh, as an open-source choice, is cost-effective for smaller enterprises, offering extensive log monitoring and compliance features, suited to budget-conscious tech buyers.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Wazuh Report
Fortinet FortiSIEM involves significant setup costs, while Wazuh is more budget-friendly with its open-source setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSIEM involves significant setup costs, while Wazuh is more budget-friendly with its open-source setup.
Wazuh Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh offers strong integration capabilities and compliance monitoring, while its open-source nature ensures cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Cribl excels in real-time data transformation, offering robust options for data management and routing, beneficial for enterprises seeking to streamline log collection and data processes.
Download Cribl vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh offers lower setup costs compared to Cribl, making it a more affordable option for initial deployment. Cribl, while having a higher setup cost, may offer features that justify the initial investment for some users.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh offers lower setup costs compared to Cribl, making it a more affordable option for initial deployment. Cribl, while having a higher setup cost, may offer features that justify the initial investment for some users.
Wazuh Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
AlienVault OSSIM offers comprehensive asset discovery and intrusion detection with an integrated platform. In comparison, Wazuh emphasizes real-time analytics and log data analysis. AlienVault's seamless deployment attracts those needing support, while Wazuh appeals to those favoring customization through its open-source capabilities.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Wazuh Report
AlienVault OSSIM typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Wazuh offers a more affordable implementation, highlighting a key pricing contrast.
View comparison
Pricing
AlienVault OSSIM typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Wazuh offers a more affordable implementation, highlighting a key pricing contrast.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.8 out of 5
Wazuh offers open-source flexibility and cost efficiency with robust security features and customization. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service provides scalability and managed solutions, appealing to users prioritizing efficiency with less focus on customization.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh has no initial setup cost, while Amazon OpenSearch Service requires a significant setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh has no initial setup cost, while Amazon OpenSearch Service requires a significant setup investment.
Wazuh Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Amazon CloudWatch offers seamless AWS integration, real-time metrics, and alerts, making it ideal for AWS environments. In comparison, Wazuh, being open-source, provides strong security features and flexibility, beneficial for compliance monitoring across diverse environments.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Wazuh Report
Amazon CloudWatch typically has a straightforward setup cost, while Wazuh generally offers a more budget-friendly setup. The primary difference is in the initial financial investment required to begin leveraging their respective features.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon CloudWatch typically has a straightforward setup cost, while Wazuh generally offers a more budget-friendly setup. The primary difference is in the initial financial investment required to begin leveraging their respective features.
Wazuh Logo
syslog-ng
4.5 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
syslog-ng
4.5 out of 5
Syslog-ng excels in high-performance log management with flexible collection and processing, ideal for environments focused on log management. In comparison, Wazuh offers comprehensive security functions such as intrusion detection and compliance benefits, making it suitable for organizations seeking advanced security features.
Download Wazuh vs. syslog-ng Report
Syslog-ng has a higher initial setup cost than Wazuh, which offers more cost-effective options.
View comparison
Pricing
Syslog-ng has a higher initial setup cost than Wazuh, which offers more cost-effective options.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
3.9 out of 5
Wazuh attracts buyers with its modular open-source model, allowing cost-effective customization. In comparison, Google Chronicle offers rapid threat detection and seamless Google service integration, appealing to enterprises focusing on fast, scalable cloud-based security solutions. Both provide distinct advantages in implementation and cost structure.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh typically involves lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while Google Chronicle Suite's setup costs are higher, indicating a potentially more robust initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh typically involves lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while Google Chronicle Suite's setup costs are higher, indicating a potentially more robust initial investment.
Wazuh Logo
Sentinel
3.7 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Sentinel
3.7 out of 5
Sentinel offers extensive security features and seamless Microsoft integration, ideal for enterprises needing advanced threat detection. In comparison, Wazuh provides open-source flexibility and comprehensive SIEM functionalities, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions with good scalability and platform integration capabilities.
Download Sentinel vs. Wazuh Report
Sentinel's setup cost is higher, reflecting robust enterprise features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to small businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel's setup cost is higher, reflecting robust enterprise features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to small businesses.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers premium network insights, ideal for users needing comprehensive Fortinet integration and security reporting. In comparison, Wazuh is an open-source solution, appealing for its cost-effective vulnerability assessment and flexibility across diverse environments with cloud-native deployment support.
Download Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Wazuh Report
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer involves higher setup costs compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer involves higher setup costs compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in advanced threat detection and cloud integration, suitable for enterprises. In comparison, Wazuh offers robust open-source compliance solutions, ideal for budget-conscious buyers, though it lacks the native advanced threat capabilities and enterprise-grade features of Securonix.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Wazuh Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more budget-friendly option. Their pricing reflects differences in features and scalability, making Securonix more costly but potentially offering advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more budget-friendly option. Their pricing reflects differences in features and scalability, making Securonix more costly but potentially offering advanced capabilities.
Wazuh Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam offers advanced analytics and automation suited for AWS environments. In comparison, Wazuh excels with open-source flexibility, strong integration, and compliance features. Exabeam is ideal for advanced behavior analytics, while Wazuh provides cost-effective scalability for businesses prioritizing cloud compatibility.
Download Exabeam vs. Wazuh Report
Exabeam requires a substantial setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly installation option.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam requires a substantial setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly installation option.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
4.0 out of 5
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server appeals for its straightforward log management with simple installation and competitive pricing. In comparison, Wazuh offers more comprehensive security features and flexibility, with its open-source model providing extensive capabilities, making it attractive for detailed system monitoring.
Download SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs. Wazuh Report
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers a straightforward setup with associated costs, while Wazuh provides a more complex installation but without setup fees. This highlights a clear contrast in the initial cost for users.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server offers a straightforward setup with associated costs, while Wazuh provides a more complex installation but without setup fees. This highlights a clear contrast in the initial cost for users.
Wazuh Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Coralogix excels in real-time analytics and streamlined cloud deployment, catering to tech buyers seeking advanced data visualization and support. In comparison, Wazuh offers robust security features with an open-source model, appealing to those requiring comprehensive security controls and customizable deployment options.
Download Coralogix vs. Wazuh Report
Coralogix offers a competitive setup cost favorable for businesses seeking efficient log management, while Wazuh provides a cost-effective solution geared towards comprehensive security monitoring, highlighting a disparity in initial financial considerations between the two options.
View comparison
Pricing
Coralogix offers a competitive setup cost favorable for businesses seeking efficient log management, while Wazuh provides a cost-effective solution geared towards comprehensive security monitoring, highlighting a disparity in initial financial considerations between the two options.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
ManageEngine Log360 is ideal for organizations seeking a comprehensive log management solution with modular architecture and advanced features. In comparison, Wazuh attracts those preferring open-source, cost-effective solutions with notable cloud-native integrations and flexible deployments for varied resource needs.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. Wazuh Report
ManageEngine Log360 has a notable setup cost, whereas Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Log360 has a notable setup cost, whereas Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Google Cloud operations suite offers seamless integration with Google services for cloud-native support. In comparison, Wazuh provides flexibility with its open-source model and exceptional security analytics, appealing to enterprises needing customized solutions. Pricing structures vary, catering to different organizational budget priorities.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Wazuh Report
Google Cloud's operations suite offers flexible setup options typically reflected in its pricing, whereas Wazuh is known for being more cost-effective with lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud's operations suite offers flexible setup options typically reflected in its pricing, whereas Wazuh is known for being more cost-effective with lower initial setup expenses.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Wazuh excels in cost-effectiveness and excellent support, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking simplicity. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR offers comprehensive features and advanced capabilities, justifying higher costs for organizations seeking robust security and customization options.
Download Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh's setup cost is notably lower compared to Stellar Cyber Open XDR, which reflects its streamlined installation process. Stellar Cyber Open XDR presents a more enterprise-focused installation, potentially leading to higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh's setup cost is notably lower compared to Stellar Cyber Open XDR, which reflects its streamlined installation process. Stellar Cyber Open XDR presents a more enterprise-focused installation, potentially leading to higher setup expenses.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh offers cost-effective open-source integration and compliance management ideal for budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites delivers strong cloud-based security features for comprehensive endpoint protection, despite higher pricing, appealing to enterprise users prioritizing detailed security solutions.
Download Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs. Wazuh Report
Wazuh offers a lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious users, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites provide a more comprehensive initial investment that may appeal to those seeking a premium service.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh offers a lower setup cost, attracting budget-conscious users, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites provide a more comprehensive initial investment that may appeal to those seeking a premium service.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Adlumin Security Operations
1 out of 5
Wazuh, favored for its cost-effective open-source monitoring, serves technically adept users needing threat detection and compliance. In comparison, Adlumin Cybersecurity offers ease with cloud-based deployment and advanced automated threat intelligence, appealing to those prioritizing functionality despite higher costs.
Wazuh offers no initial setup cost, providing straightforward entry, whereas Adlumin Security Operations involves a one-time setup fee, highlighting a financial distinction for new adopters.
View comparison
Pricing
Wazuh offers no initial setup cost, providing straightforward entry, whereas Adlumin Security Operations involves a one-time setup fee, highlighting a financial distinction for new adopters.
Wazuh Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Anomali attracts enterprises with its expansive threat intelligence capabilities for proactive security. In comparison, Wazuh provides a cost-effective, open-source solution, ideal for budget-conscious organizations seeking customizable security monitoring, making each appealing to different organizational security strategies.
Download Anomali vs. Wazuh Report
Anomali setup costs are considered high, requiring substantial investment, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to those with cost constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Anomali setup costs are considered high, requiring substantial investment, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to those with cost constraints.
Wazuh Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Devo excels in advanced analytics and data storage capabilities, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Wazuh offers integration flexibility with open-source affordability, attractive to budget-conscious buyers seeking basic security features, though Devo provides a more comprehensive analytics suite.
Download Devo vs. Wazuh Report
Devo offers an affordable setup cost with quick implementation, whereas Wazuh provides a cost-effective setup but may require more extensive configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Devo offers an affordable setup cost with quick implementation, whereas Wazuh provides a cost-effective setup but may require more extensive configuration.
Wazuh Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere combines SIEM, vulnerability scanning, and threat intelligence for integrated security management. In comparison, Wazuh offers open-source flexibility, integrating with environments like AWS. USM suits small teams with its unified view, while Wazuh is ideal for those needing customizable solutions.
Download USM Anywhere vs. Wazuh Report
USM Anywhere has a straightforward setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more customizable approach with flexible installation options.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere has a straightforward setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more customizable approach with flexible installation options.
Wazuh Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Wazuh Logo
Mandiant Advantage
4.2 out of 5
Mandiant Advantage excels in threat detection through advanced analytics and intelligence, appealing to those focused on sophisticated attacks. In comparison, Wazuh's comprehensive open-source solution integrating SIEM and compliance suits organizations prioritizing flexibility and cost-effectiveness in cybersecurity.
Download Mandiant Advantage vs. Wazuh Report
Mandiant Advantage requires a significant setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more modest initial installation expense. This pricing distinction highlights Mandiant Advantage's advanced features compared to Wazuh's accessible deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Mandiant Advantage requires a significant setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more modest initial installation expense. This pricing distinction highlights Mandiant Advantage's advanced features compared to Wazuh's accessible deployment.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
4.1 out of 5
VMware Aria Operations for Logs excels in integrating with VMware environments, offering features for virtualization and analytics. In comparison, Wazuh attracts tech buyers with its open-source model, security focus, and cost-effectiveness, particularly appealing to small and medium-sized organizations seeking flexible solutions.
Download VMware Aria Operations for Logs vs. Wazuh Report
VMware Aria Operations for Logs has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, highlighting a more significant investment difference.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Operations for Logs has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, highlighting a more significant investment difference.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is ideal for large enterprises needing advanced features and scalability. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source, cost-effective model suits organizations prioritizing affordability and flexibility, especially for those with budget constraints or smaller-scale deployments.
Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Wazuh Report
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager involves a substantial setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This highlights a cost difference that may impact budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager involves a substantial setup cost, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This highlights a cost difference that may impact budget-conscious buyers.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer focuses on customization, real-time alerting, and integration ease. In comparison, Wazuh prioritizes open-source flexibility with comprehensive threat detection features. ManageEngine's straightforward pricing contrasts with Wazuh's lower initial costs, appealing to those valuing either scalable plans or community-driven resources.
Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. Wazuh Report
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers competitive setup costs, while Wazuh prides itself on more budget-friendly options. The primary differences in cost can significantly impact budget-constrained users when considering these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers competitive setup costs, while Wazuh prides itself on more budget-friendly options. The primary differences in cost can significantly impact budget-constrained users when considering these solutions.
Wazuh Logo
Wazuh Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security excels with real-time observability and integration simplicity, suitable for organizations prioritizing sophisticated search capabilities. In comparison, Wazuh, with its open-source flexibility, appeals to those needing extensive compliance and SIEM features within budget constraints, despite requiring more customization.
Download Sumo Logic Security vs. Wazuh Report
Sumo Logic Security incurs higher setup costs, while Wazuh offers a lower-cost setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security incurs higher setup costs, while Wazuh offers a lower-cost setup.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)