IBM Security QRadar vs Wazuh comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 12, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Security QRadar
Ranking in Log Management
6th
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
4th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
198
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (19th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (4th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (10th)
Wazuh
Ranking in Log Management
2nd
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
3rd
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of IBM Security QRadar is 5.0%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 18.6%, up from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
Unique Categories:
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
9.5%
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
13.3%
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
15.6%
 

Featured Reviews

Jacob_Koithra - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 3, 2022
Good monitoring and dashboards with good blocking capabilities
We use the blocking mode and spam mode for the IPS - XGS 5000 series and use of QRadar as a SIEM Solution for logging and monitoring network security, security analysis, and monitoring for network-related attacks.  The playbook is defined with identified use cases. IPS acted as an inline to the…
Usman Arif - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 21, 2023
Transforming security features with notable vulnerability reduction and comprehensive compliance
It is used primarily for event management in our organization, which falls into the category of an edge Intrusion Detection System (IDS) or host Internet protection system. Our company is not very large, with around twenty to thirty servers and approximately one hundred fifty to two hundred…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The threat hunting capabilities in general are great."
"The product has plenty of features and capabilities."
"Log correlation is very useful for processing alerts. It serves to follow up alerts in real-time, building an entire workflow."
"QRadar shows very effective correlations. If you combine all the logins plus user behavior and the current intelligence, it gives a very good correlation for business. I think it reduces the false positives in user activity monitoring because there is a lot of social information to correlate with other data."
"The most valuable features of IBM Security QRadar are flexibility, IBM support, and scalability."
"Technical support is good overall."
"Flexible and valuable product that is modular, so you can easily set up a roadmap for your clients."
"The ability to add extensions is the most valuable feature. For example, extensions that provide valuable test ports."
"Wazuh has very flexible and robust features."
"My company implemented Wazuh because it was relatively inexpensive. They could quickly get their hands on it to check a box for some audit and compliance."
"I like the cloud-native infrastructure and that it's free. We didn't have to pay anything, and it has the capabilities of many premium solutions in the market. We could integrate all of our services and infrastructure in the cloud with Wazuh. From an integration point of view, Wazuh is pretty good. I had a good experience with this platform."
"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I like the features we use, including malware detection, inventory, detection of hidden processes, and activity logs. Inventory is probably the most important feature. It tells us when processes and packages were installed and what they are, which is helpful."
"Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
 

Cons

"The initial setup requires that you have somebody with the proper skill set, and it would help if the configuration were easier."
"I think QRadar is very complex. It's a distributed system and IBM QRadar has an all-in-one solution which is not like that distributed solution but it's a good product. IBM needs to consider the user interface because if we compare it with AlienVault, the AlienVault user interface is fantastic but the IBM QRadar user interface is very complex. They should focus on how to make it easier for the client."
"Each module requires a separate license and a separate cost."
"There are areas in IBM Security QRadar that could benefit from improvement. Its ability to customize knowledge for specific purposes could be enhanced. Also, it lacks clarity in presenting details. It is also difficult to see the reports."
"Maybe there should be more custom rules in the exchange. Basically, we are using a lot of threat rules, so maybe they'll develop something like that."
"The API integration for AD is a problem when it comes to vulnerability management. If you want to incorporate multiple factor authentication it becomes a problem with the AD. It doesn't integrate well. That needs to be improved."
"There could be improvements made to the UI, the user interface. Though the newer version, 7.3.2, might already have this improvement in place."
"I'd like them to improve the offense. When QRadar detects something, it creates what it calls offenses. So, it has a rudimentary ticketing system inside of it. This is the same interface that was there when I started using it 12 years ago. It just has not been improved. They do allow integration with IBM Resilient, but IBM Resilient is grotesquely expensive. The most effective integration that IBM offers today is with IBM Resilient, which is an instant response platform. It is a very good platform, but it is very expensive. They really should do something with the offense handling because it is very difficult to scale, and it has limitations. The maximum number of offenses that it can carry is 16K. After 16K, you have to flush your offenses out. So, it is all or nothing. You lose all your offenses up until that point in time, and you don't have any history within the offense list of older events. If you're dealing with multiple customers, this becomes problematic. That's why you need to use another product to do the actual ticketing. If you wanted the ticket existence, you would normally interface with ServiceNow, SolarWinds, or some other product like that."
"The biggest part that's missing is threat intelligence. It isn't inbuilt, and if a sudden incident occurs, we don't get that feedback inside the SIEM tool. That's a big gap, I see. It would be better if we could get the threat intelligence feeds integrated with the SIEM tools. That would help us push value solutions to the clients in a big way."
"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."
"Since it's an open-source tool, scalability is the main issue."
"Wazuh currently fails to provide its users with AI and ML."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"Its configuration process is time-consuming."
"The technical support can be improved. Wazuh has some bugs that need to be fixed. It would be good if we can have automation with respect to incidence responses."
"The tool does not provide CTI to monitor darknet."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive. We have purchased the perpetual license, but we pay for the support."
"Most of the time, it is easier and cheaper to buy a new product or the QRadar box."
"It's free of charge."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is an application framework and you can install many applications without any additional costs."
"Go through a vulnerability assessment review for price breaks. A virtualized solution will also cut down on cost."
"I would like for them to lower the price."
"It is costlier as compared to the other alternatives available in the market."
"There is a license to use this solution, which is paid annually. However, there are subscription options available."
"The product is cheaper compared to other tools."
"Wazuh has a community edition, and I was using that. It's free and open source."
"They have a good pricing strategy for market expansion."
"The current pricing is open source."
"Wazuh is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for use."
"Wazuh is free and open source."
"When I contacted customer care, they mentioned bundling options, that I found to be overall affordable."
"It is an open-source product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
What do you like most about IBM QRadar?
The event collector, flow collector, PCAP and SOAR are valuable.
What do you like most about Wazuh?
Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.
What needs improvement with Wazuh?
I have built some rules that produce duplicate alerts two or three times. Therefore, these rules should be consolidated. Alerts should be specific rather than repeatedly triggered by integrating mu...
What is your primary use case for Wazuh?
We use Wazuh for the onboarding of both Windows and Linux machines, as well as for firewall and SIM configuration. The IP address is automatically blocked if a server has multiple wrong passwords.
 

Also Known As

IBM QRadar, QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar, IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics, IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security QRadar vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.