No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

JRebel vs TeamCity comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JRebel
Ranking in Build Automation
30th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of JRebel is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 4.9%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
TeamCity4.9%
JRebel1.0%
Other94.1%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

it_user177786 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Easy to configure, works well, has 'free' options (like Social)
Easy to configure, works well, has 'free' options (like Social) It gets the used time for redeploy in a development environment really fast and of course that's a good point. Development environment I had a little problem in redeploying applications using a specific…
Almoeeni Fazal - PeerSpot reviewer
Python Django developer at Cielo WiGle Inc.
Impressive pipeline efficiency with helpful support and a fairly straightforward setup
We use TeamCity for the CI/CD pipeline. It is used for deploying code from the desktop to the production environment. We push our code to GitHub, which then creates a pipeline to a server using AWS, deploying automatically without errors or conflicts in GitHub branches.  We also use TeamCity's…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Easy to configure, works well, has 'free' options (like Social)."
"Good visualization of builds Easy configuration Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."
"I have used Jenkins, TFS, Cruise Control .net, and GO, and I switched from using Cruise Control .net as TeamCity is easier to use and displays important information very well, with great support for integrating to other products from JetBrains and other vendors such as Atlassian, JIRA, and Windows AD."
"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."
"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."
"The setup is extremely straightforward."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"The templates allow a consistent configuration on how an application is built, and by combining the use of the meta-runner and build templates, the whole organisation understands, and follows, this convention."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration, and it also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
 

Cons

"I had a little problem in redeploying applications using a specific framework (reactor + spring) in a Maven multi-module project."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"Deployment functions need work."
"However, in TeamCity, the whole build is like a whole block, and there is no way to stop."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate; they need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"The integration between other solutions and TeamCity could be smoother."
"For our system, it wasn't scalable due to storage issues."
"This product lacks real reporting for all the information it captures; we should be able to create reports or dashboards for management."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The licensing is on an annual basis."
"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ZeroTurnaround JRebel
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MS Learning & Consulting, NetworkedAssets, Vaadin Ltd, Heliocentris, Result Group
Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab and others in Build Automation. Updated: October 2026.
921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.