"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"TeamCity's GUI is nice."
"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
Incredibuild is ranked 11th in Build Automation with 1 review while TeamCity is ranked 5th in Build Automation with 3 reviews. Incredibuild is rated 8.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Good integration and CI/CD flow". Incredibuild is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo and CircleCI, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, Jenkins, Harness and Bamboo.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
