No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

JFrog Pipeline vs TeamCity comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JFrog Pipeline
Ranking in Build Automation
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of JFrog Pipeline is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 4.9%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
TeamCity4.9%
JFrog Pipeline1.9%
Other93.2%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Steve Buttler - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Lead at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point
We are using Shippable to automate our CI/CD, so we (and our developers) can focus on our core business.  Shippable has tremendously increased our product and features delivery by at least three times. The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug…
Almoeeni Fazal - PeerSpot reviewer
Python Django developer at Cielo WiGle Inc.
Impressive pipeline efficiency with helpful support and a fairly straightforward setup
We use TeamCity for the CI/CD pipeline. It is used for deploying code from the desktop to the production environment. We push our code to GitHub, which then creates a pipeline to a server using AWS, deploying automatically without errors or conflicts in GitHub branches.  We also use TeamCity's…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."
"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."
"Shippable has tremendously increased our product and features delivery by at least three times."
"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."
"It is vital to our business to have quick and robust builds, and TeamCity is helping us to keep everything tidy and under control."
"There is much online documentation for TeamCity, with certain learning materials such as videos."
"The setup is extremely straightforward."
"TeamCity is more structured and user-friendly than other vendors."
"It was simple and easy to use, with great features which are always customizable."
"The solution has been fantastic for our organization due to the fact that we do not need a designer having to build the product and we don't need to figure out how to deploy it either, creating improved efficiencies which have saved us time and expense."
"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."
 

Cons

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."
"However, in TeamCity, the whole build is like a whole block, and there is no way to stop."
"I would like to see an improvement where TeamCity alerts us via email or another medium if there are discrepancies between the code in the staging environment and what has been deployed to production, such as missing updates."
"Occasionally issues deploying software using the tool due to configuration issues within the tool (mostly around powershell configuration)."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
"Setting up build configurations involves too many steps, as the process is too much broken down."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."
"Net deployment needs improvement. Also, I'd like to see more NuGet/Octopus style features and Azure stuff."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."
"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
"The licensing is on an annual basis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Insurance Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Shippable
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SAP, Today Tix, Cisco, Lithium, Pushspring, Packet
Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab and others in Build Automation. Updated: October 2026.
921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.