Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Enterprise Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Microsoft Sentinel.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security surpasses its competitors by offering real-time threat detection, advanced analytics, and customizable reporting, empowering organizations with unparalleled visibility and control over their security landscape.
Splunk Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in managing large data environments with superior log management and data visualization. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on advanced threat detection and AI-driven analytics. Splunk offers extensive functionality; CrowdStrike provides robust endpoint protection with seamless deployment across cloud environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon tends to offer a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features, whereas CrowdStrike focuses on streamlined efficiency and lower initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon tends to offer a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features, whereas CrowdStrike focuses on streamlined efficiency and lower initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs for its comprehensive analytics capabilities, while Wazuh offers a cost-effective setup with its open-source platform approach, highlighting a significant financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs for its comprehensive analytics capabilities, while Wazuh offers a cost-effective setup with its open-source platform approach, highlighting a significant financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and data customization, ideal for large enterprises needing robust analysis. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless Azure integration and AI-driven threat detection, appealing to those heavily invested in Microsoft environments, despite potential cost challenges.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in analytics and threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing security insights. In comparison, Dynatrace offers seamless integration and automated features, making it attractive for efficient performance management. Splunk's customization contrasts with Dynatrace's straightforward deployment and quicker ROI.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in complex environments with extensive log management and operational intelligence. In comparison, Datadog offers comprehensive infrastructure and application performance monitoring. Splunk shines in large-scale operations, while Datadog is suitable for real-time insights with vast integrations.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels at data ingestion and analysis with robust search and compliance support. In comparison, New Relic offers strong performance monitoring and error tracking. Tech buyers might choose Splunk for data insights and security or New Relic for application performance.
IBM Security QRadar excels in vulnerability management, threat detection, and integration. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security offers strong log management and community support. A tech buyer might choose QRadar for affordability and customization, while Splunk provides extensive analytics and flexibility across deployment environments.
IBM Security QRadar typically has a lower setup cost, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is higher, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses for businesses considering these security solutions.
IBM Security QRadar typically has a lower setup cost, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is higher, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses for businesses considering these security solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security is ideal for those needing advanced data visualization and rapid incident response through dynamic queries. In comparison, Elastic Security caters to users valuing flexibility, open-source benefits, and seamless integration with the ELK Stack for pattern identification.
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost can be substantial, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Elastic Security offers a potentially lower setup cost, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly options.
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost can be substantial, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Elastic Security offers a potentially lower setup cost, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly options.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with rapid incident response and versatile deployment. In comparison, Elastic Observability is cost-effective with strong cloud features and text search. Buyers may choose Splunk for comprehensive support or Elastic for open-source flexibility and affordability.
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Grafana Loki presents a more cost-effective initial investment. This highlights a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Grafana Loki presents a more cost-effective initial investment. This highlights a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced log management and rapid incident response, suitable for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, Graylog's open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness appeal to those needing basic visualization and integration with Elasticsearch, meeting simpler organizational needs.
Splunk Enterprise Security typically requires a higher setup cost compared to Graylog, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security typically requires a higher setup cost compared to Graylog, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers powerful analytics and comprehensive data management, appealing to large-scale enterprises. In comparison, Security Onion focuses on network security monitoring, providing cost-effectiveness with open-source access, suiting smaller organizations with limited budgets and rapid deployment needs.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant initial setup cost, while Security Onion offers a more cost-effective setup option. Splunk provides comprehensive features for large enterprises, whereas Security Onion prioritizes open-source affordability and ease of deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant initial setup cost, while Security Onion offers a more cost-effective setup option. Splunk provides comprehensive features for large enterprises, whereas Security Onion prioritizes open-source affordability and ease of deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security enhances security with visibility, platform integration, and risk-based alerts. In comparison, Palantir Foundry excels in data integration and management across frameworks. Splunk's deployment flexibility contrasts with Foundry's cloud focus, both offering high-cost, high-value solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Palantir Foundry, presenting a significant price difference in the initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Palantir Foundry, presenting a significant price difference in the initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security is known for data management and real-time alerts, excelling in flexibility and integration. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM offers advanced AI for threat detection and seamless integration with Palo Alto Networks products, providing competitive pricing with comprehensive features.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a more substantial setup cost, while Cortex XSIAM is geared towards a more modest initial financial outlay. Both solutions target different budget considerations for their respective user requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a more substantial setup cost, while Cortex XSIAM is geared towards a more modest initial financial outlay. Both solutions target different budget considerations for their respective user requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides vast flexibility in deployment and operational intelligence through superior log management. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM emphasizes affordability, AI-driven monitoring, and reliability, catering to medium and large businesses needing cost-effective solutions with comprehensive third-party integration.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and operational intelligence with schema-on-read technology, offering flexibility and broad data ingestion. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR emphasizes user behavior analytics and automated responses, providing ease of integration and cost-effective threat detection solutions with intuitive dashboards.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in search and data analysis, appealing to those valuing operational intelligence. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM integrates SOC and NOC functionalities, suiting organizations seeking comprehensive security and network operations management with cost-effective pricing and third-party integration capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making FortiSIEM a preferable choice for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making FortiSIEM a preferable choice for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in search and data presentation, making it ideal for compliance and diverse data insights. In comparison, AlienVault OSSIM's open-source model is cost-effective, offering inclusive security features suitable for small to medium businesses seeking manageable integration.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers a different setup cost experience compared to AlienVault OSSIM, highlighting the variance in initial investment. AlienVault OSSIM often appeals to those seeking budget-friendly options, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security targets enterprises with robust ...
Splunk Enterprise Security offers a different setup cost experience compared to AlienVault OSSIM, highlighting the variance in initial investment. AlienVault OSSIM often appeals to those seeking budget-friendly options, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security targets enterprises with robust ...
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a higher setup cost, while syslog-ng offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a higher setup cost, while syslog-ng offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data management and flexibility in security insights, ideal for complex datasets. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch excels in AWS integration, providing real-time monitoring but faces limitations outside AWS. Both cater to different tech buyer priorities efficiently.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust data search capabilities and log management, appealing for its scalability and integration across sources. In comparison, ScienceLogic excels in application integration and multi-tenant architecture, attracting buyers with customizable dashboards and extensive device monitoring.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost than ScienceLogic, which is a more affordable option. ScienceLogic's pricing is appealing compared to the more premium pricing of Splunk's solution.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost than ScienceLogic, which is a more affordable option. ScienceLogic's pricing is appealing compared to the more premium pricing of Splunk's solution.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data analytics and customization, appealing to those seeking comprehensive data analysis. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer attracts with cost-efficiency and seamless Fortinet integration, ideal for streamlined log management and network security insights.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in flexible deployments and robust support, ideal for complex customization and deep analytics. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers straightforward cloud-native deployment with cost efficiency, focusing on seamless integration and scalability for tech buyers prioritizing integration and real-time threat detection.
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs compared to the competitive setup fees associated with Google Chronicle Suite, reflecting notable pricing differences between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs compared to the competitive setup fees associated with Google Chronicle Suite, reflecting notable pricing differences between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust log management and operational intelligence for comprehensive security solutions, which makes it ideal for organizations focused on compliance and quick problem resolution. In comparison, Cribl's cost-effective data processing and routing features optimize storage costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Securonix excels in behavioral analytics and ease of use. In comparison, Splunk offers flexibility with data sources and advanced customizability, making it ideal for complex environments. Securonix serves cloud-focused organizations, while Splunk benefits those prioritizing extensive data analytics and integration.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup costs are significantly lower, while Splunk Enterprise Security's setup costs are higher. This difference highlights the cost-effectiveness of Securonix when comparing initial investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup costs are significantly lower, while Splunk Enterprise Security's setup costs are higher. This difference highlights the cost-effectiveness of Securonix when comparing initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with advanced search capabilities and a holistic view for complex security, making it ideal for extensive data environments. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers simplicity in setup and reduced infrastructure costs, appealing to users valuing cost-effective management.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs, emphasizing its robust and comprehensive features, whereas Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to users seeking a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs, emphasizing its robust and comprehensive features, whereas Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to users seeking a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides advanced threat detection and robust incident management, making it ideal for complex needs. In comparison, Exabeam's user-friendly interface and effective behavioral analytics cater well to smaller enterprises through flexible pricing and straightforward deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced analytics and threat detection for security professionals, appealing to those seeking complex capabilities. In comparison, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server provides an affordable, easy-to-deploy solution, making it attractive for basic central logging and small to medium-sized enterprises.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost, offering an extensive range of features, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server provides a cost-effective solution with basic capabilities, highlighting significant differences in pricing and feature depth between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost, offering an extensive range of features, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server provides a cost-effective solution with basic capabilities, highlighting significant differences in pricing and feature depth between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security's robust analytics excel in transforming data into insights, suiting large environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates smoothly with Azure, ideal for those using Microsoft's cloud. Splunk's cost is a concern, while Sentinel offers predictable pricing within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in real-time monitoring and flexible data storage, ideal for compliance needs. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite integrates easily with Google resources, offering detailed application insights. Tech buyers choose based on integration needs and cost structures.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, which offers a cost-efficient alternative with simplified integration.
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, which offers a cost-efficient alternative with simplified integration.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data visualization, scalability, and integration, appealing to large enterprises needing robust analytics. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360 provides cost-effective application log monitoring and an intuitive dashboard, suitable for smaller teams prioritizing easy deployment and affordability.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, whereas ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, whereas ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive log management, while IBM SevOne NPM excels in network monitoring. In comparison, Splunk's extensibility supports custom solutions, and IBM SevOne NPM provides deep network insights. A tech buyer might choose based on specific operational intelligence or network performance needs.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust log management and scalability, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Coralogix focuses on next-generation log analysis and affordability, appealing to businesses seeking rapid deployment and lower costs with AI capabilities. Each solution caters to different operational needs.
Splunk Enterprise Security is valued for its detailed analytics and scalability offering insights into threats. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR excels in advanced threat detection and automation. This emphasizes Splunk's data processing strengths versus Stellar Cyber's focus on ease of integration and automation.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a more economical solution, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence budget-conscious buyers.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a more economical solution, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence budget-conscious buyers.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust scalability and diverse data integrations, ideal for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, Devo excels in real-time analytics with user-friendly interfaces. Buyers might choose Splunk for comprehensive analysis or Devo for cost-effective, flexible environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security often has a higher setup cost compared to Devo, which is generally praised for its affordability and simpler installation process.
Splunk Enterprise Security often has a higher setup cost compared to Devo, which is generally praised for its affordability and simpler installation process.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection, handling large data volumes with customization. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer provides seamless integration within the ManageEngine suite. In comparison, Splunk excels in high-speed data processing, while ManageEngine focuses on ease of adoption and cost-efficiency.
Splunk Enterprise Security setup costs are typically high, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer often presents a more budget-friendly option. The significant price difference highlights their distinct market positions and target user bases.
Splunk Enterprise Security setup costs are typically high, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer often presents a more budget-friendly option. The significant price difference highlights their distinct market positions and target user bases.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with scalable data ingestion and schema-on-read technology, enhancing incident response. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs integrates seamlessly with VMware's ecosystem. Tech buyers might choose Splunk for advanced features or VMware for cost efficiency.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced security analytics, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers a lower setup cost, emphasizing streamlined log management functionalities.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced security analytics, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers a lower setup cost, emphasizing streamlined log management functionalities.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive threat detection and strong correlation capabilities, making it suitable for organizations needing robust support and a wide feature set. In comparison, Anomali excels with competitive pricing and threat intelligence integration, appealing to those prioritizing data enrichment and cost-effectiveness.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, providing a robust security platform with intricate analytics, while Anomali offers a more affordable setup with efficient threat intelligence capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Anomali, providing a robust security platform with intricate analytics, while Anomali offers a more affordable setup with efficient threat intelligence capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log analysis with strong customization, ideal for enterprises seeking robust scalability. In comparison, USM Anywhere is appealing for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, making it attractive to SMBs requiring integrated threat intelligence and vulnerability scanning.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust log management and rapid searches, integrating diverse data for operational intelligence, making it ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Moogsoft provides AI-driven event management, focusing on noise reduction and alert consolidation, appealing to businesses needing efficient incident handling.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data handling and operational intelligence but can improve machine learning and simplicity. In comparison, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers strong correlation capabilities yet needs better integration and adaptability for real-time threats, appealing to buyers focused on structured rule-based environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a straightforward setup cost, while OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is known for a more complex pricing structure with additional fees.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a straightforward setup cost, while OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is known for a more complex pricing structure with additional fees.
Splunk Enterprise Security manages large data volumes with advanced analytics, while Sumo Logic Security is noted for its real-time observability and ease of use. In comparison, Sumo Logic offers customizable search capabilities, whereas Splunk provides robust support for hybrid deployment environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in comprehensive analysis suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Logpoint offers a cost-effective solution with a simpler licensing model, making it attractive for smaller organizations. Each solution has unique strengths catering to different organizational needs and budgets.
NetWitness Platform focuses on cost-effective threat detection with easy deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data integration with comprehensive capabilities. Both differ in cost and customization, leaving tech buyers to prioritize ease or advanced analytics in their decision.
NetWitness Platform offers a customizable setup cost, allowing flexibility based on deployment needs, while Splunk Enterprise Security typically has higher initial setup expenses, reflecting its advanced out-of-the-box features.
NetWitness Platform offers a customizable setup cost, allowing flexibility based on deployment needs, while Splunk Enterprise Security typically has higher initial setup expenses, reflecting its advanced out-of-the-box features.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers rapid search and flexibility, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, ArcSight Logger ensures robust log management with scalability. Splunk's varied deployment suits diverse needs, while ArcSight's integration aids existing systems. Both products offer distinct value propositions for tech buyers.
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, while ArcSight Logger typically offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints.
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, while ArcSight Logger typically offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints.
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data analysis and query capabilities, suiting complex data needs. In comparison, Trellix ESM provides effective threat intelligence and ease of integration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking comprehensive SIEM capabilities. Splunk offers versatile deployment, while Trellix delivers budget-friendly solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost can be high, focusing on advanced features, while Trellix ESM offers a more affordable setup with a simpler integration process, highlighting the contrast between feature depth versus cost efficiency.
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost can be high, focusing on advanced features, while Trellix ESM offers a more affordable setup with a simpler integration process, highlighting the contrast between feature depth versus cost efficiency.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data handling, excelling in log management and rapid searching. In comparison, Check Point Security Management focuses on centralized control and robust firewall capabilities, making it ideal for network security. Splunk's scalability contrasts Check Point's comprehensive on-premises solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of Check Point Security Management, highlighting a key difference in initial financial requirements for deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of Check Point Security Management, highlighting a key difference in initial financial requirements for deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive threat detection features, while Falcon LogScale excels in efficient log management. In comparison, Falcon LogScale stands out for its streamlined deployment, making it appealing to businesses prioritizing quick integration over extensive security capabilities offered by Splunk Enterprise Security.
Splunk Enterprise Security offers holistic visibility with advanced analytics, ideal for comprehensive security insights. In comparison, Google Security Operations provides exceptional integration and automation within Google's ecosystem, appealing to enterprises prioritizing cloud-centric operations. Splunk excels in data management, while Google is preferred for simplified deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs significant setup costs, while Google Security Operations typically presents lower initial financial barriers, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront investment requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs significant setup costs, while Google Security Operations typically presents lower initial financial barriers, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront investment requirements.
