Splunk Enterprise Security and Google Chronicle Suite compete in the SIEM market. Google Chronicle Suite seems to have an edge due to leveraging Google's cloud infrastructure, offering superior threat intelligence and data retention for quicker threat detection and response.
Features: Splunk Enterprise Security is known for robust SIEM capabilities, versatile data management, and flexibility in data visualization. Google Chronicle Suite features superior threat intelligence capabilities, cloud infrastructure integration, and prolonged data retention.
Room for Improvement: Splunk could enhance pricing, simplify the UI, and offer more built-in integrations. Google Chronicle Suite needs better real-time detection and improved dashboard functionalities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk's deployment can be complex due to intricate configurations, with mixed support reviews. Google Chronicle is smoother to deploy in cloud environments, generally getting positive ease of use feedback, though support consistency could improve.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk is pricey, especially for high data ingestion, but offers higher ROI for those maximizing its benefits. Google Chronicle is more cost-effective with a data-volume-based pricing model, suitable for large-scale environments with budget constraints.
The documentation for Splunk Enterprise Security is outstanding. It is well-organized and easy to access.
We couldn't calculate what would have been the cost if they had actually gotten compromised; however, they were in the process, so every investment was returned immediately.
On average, my SecOps team takes probably at least a quarter of the time, if not more, to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to our previous solution.
We are a critical project for them at this moment, and they provide excellent service.
They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions.
I have faced challenges with technical support from Sentinel, though Sentinel support is better than Google's, while Splunk support is also not that great.
We have paid for Splunk support, and we’re not on the free tier hoping for assistance; we are a significant customer and invest a lot in this service.
I have had nothing but good experiences with Splunk support, receiving timely and helpful replies.
We've had great customer success managers who have helped us navigate scaling from 600 gigs to 30 terabytes.
I rate the scalability of Google Chronicle Suite as ten out of ten.
Google Chronicle Suite is very scalable, being a cloud-based solution.
In the cloud-native space, the problem is that if you require additional devices, you might have to work on custom applications.
We currently rely on disaster recovery and backup recovery, which takes time to recover, during which you're basically blind, so I'm pushing my leadership team to switch over to a clustering environment for constant availability.
They struggle a bit with pure virtual environments, but in terms of how much they can handle, it is pretty good.
It is easy to scale.
I rate the stability of Google Chronicle Suite as a nine, as I have not encountered any stability issues.
They test it very thoroughly before release, and our customers have Splunk running for months without issues.
Splunk has been very reliable and very consistent.
It provides a stable environment but needs to integrate with ITSM platforms to achieve better visibility.
The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience.
The UI is the primary challenge in need of improvement.
Google Chronicle Suite lacks near time detection.
Improving the infrastructure behind Splunk Enterprise Security is vital—enhanced cores, CPUs, and memory should be prioritized to support better processing power.
Splunk Enterprise Security is not something that automatically picks things; you have to set up use cases, update data models, and link the right use cases to the right data models for those detections to happen.
For any future enhancements or features, such as MLTK and SOAR platform integration, we need more visibility, training, and certification for the skilled professionals who are working.
It's neither expensive nor cheap, and I believe it is a justified price for the features offered.
Compared to a SIEM like Microsoft Sentinel, it is much more affordable.
I experience Chronicle as less expensive and less complicated than Azure.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
The platform requires significant financial investment and resources, making it expensive despite its comprehensive features.
I find it to be affordable, which is why every industry uses it.
They also combine their source solution into one product, allowing for out-of-the-box playbook creation and incident response.
The AI infused into the platform helps in investigations and rule creation.
The automated response feature allows for immediate actions like isolating infected machines or blocking malicious IP addresses.
This capability is useful for performance monitoring and issue identification.
I assess Splunk Enterprise Security's insider threat detection capabilities for helping to find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior as great.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides the foundation for unified threat detection, investigation, and response, enabling fast identification of critical issues.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 9.3% |
| Google Chronicle Suite | 2.8% |
| Other | 87.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 110 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 48 |
| Large Enterprise | 255 |
Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.
Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.
What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.
Splunk Enterprise Security delivers powerful log management, rapid searches, and intuitive dashboards, enhancing real-time analytics and security measures. Its advanced machine learning and wide system compatibility streamline threat detection and incident response across diverse IT environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security stands out in security operations with robust features like comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless data integration. Its real-time analytics and customizable queries enable proactive threat analysis and efficient incident response. Integration with multiple third-party feeds allows detailed threat correlation and streamlined data visualization. Users find the intuitive UI and broad compatibility support efficient threat detection while reducing false positives. Despite its strengths, areas such as visualization capabilities and integration processes with cloud environments need enhancement. Users face a high learning curve, and improvements in automation, AI, documentation, and training are desired to maximize its potential.
What Are the Key Features of Splunk Enterprise Security?In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Enterprise Security is instrumental for log aggregation, SIEM functionalities, and compliance monitoring. Companies leverage its capabilities for proactive threat analysis and response, ensuring comprehensive security monitoring and integration with various tools for heightened operational intelligence.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
