Top 10 SiteLock Alternatives

3.3 out of 5

3 reviews
66% willing to recommend

Top SiteLock Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SiteLock based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Veracode, and Imperva Application Security Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SiteLock Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SiteLock, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cloudflare

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare offers DDoS protection and network performance benefits. In comparison, SiteLock provides malware scanning and comprehensive security features. While Cloudflare is known for easy deployment, SiteLock appeals with hands-on customer service. Cloudflare’s flexible pricing suits many, whereas SiteLock’s targeted security justifies its cost.

Download Cloudflare vs. SiteLock Report

Pricing

Cloudflare offers a cost-effective setup, while SiteLock typically involves higher initial fees, highlighting a significant difference in setup costs between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare offers a cost-effective setup, while SiteLock typically involves higher initial fees, highlighting a significant difference in setup costs between the two solutions.

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode

4.1 out of 5

Veracode provides detailed security assessments and flexibility across coding environments, appealing to those needing comprehensive analysis. In comparison, SiteLock offers simplicity and effective malware detection, making it suitable for users prioritizing ease of management and threat detection at a competitive price.

Download SiteLock vs. Veracode Report

Pricing

Veracode incurs higher setup costs than SiteLock, offering advanced features tailored for enterprise-level security, while SiteLock provides a more budget-friendly setup focused on small to medium-sized businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Application Security Platform

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Application Security Platform

4.3 out of 5

Imperva excels in threat intelligence and bot management, appealing to enterprises needing advanced protection. In comparison, SiteLock provides automated malware detection at a lower cost, making it suitable for smaller businesses. Deploying Imperva suits complex needs, whereas SiteLock's simplicity aids speedy implementation.

Download Imperva Application Security Platform vs. SiteLock Report

Pricing

Imperva Application Security Platform typically involves higher setup costs compared to SiteLock, which offers a more affordable initial investment, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Application Security Platform typically involves higher setup costs compared to SiteLock, which offers a more affordable initial investment, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.

Fortinet FortiWeb

3.9 out of 5

Fortinet FortiWeb

3.9 out of 5

SiteLock appeals to smaller businesses with its cost-effective pricing, simple deployment, and supportive customer service. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb offers advanced features and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises willing to invest in comprehensive web security for complex needs.

Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. SiteLock Report

Pricing

SiteLock features a straightforward setup cost, while Fortinet FortiWeb presents a more intricate and potentially higher pricing structure. This results in SiteLock being more predictable in cost, contrasting with Fortinet FortiWeb's complex pricing tiers.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

SiteLock excels in automated security features and personalized customer service suited for smaller businesses. In comparison, AWS WAF offers advanced custom rules and scalability within Amazon's ecosystem, appealing to those requiring detailed traffic monitoring and integration with AWS services.

Download AWS WAF vs. SiteLock Report

Pricing

SiteLock offers a simple setup cost structure, while AWS WAF has a more complex and potentially higher initial setup cost based on configuration needs.

View comparison

Pricing

SiteLock offers a simple setup cost structure, while AWS WAF has a more complex and potentially higher initial setup cost based on configuration needs.

Fastly

4.4 out of 5

Fastly

4.4 out of 5

SiteLock emphasizes comprehensive security with features like malware scanning and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Fastly enhances performance through CDN services with real-time logging and edge computing, appealing to enterprises seeking long-term scalability. SiteLock suits small businesses needing cost-effective security solutions.

Download Fastly vs. SiteLock Report

Pricing

SiteLock has a low setup cost, making it accessible for budget-conscious users, whereas Fastly has a higher initial cost but includes advanced features suitable for large-scale operations.

View comparison

Pricing

SiteLock has a low setup cost, making it accessible for budget-conscious users, whereas Fastly has a higher initial cost but includes advanced features suitable for large-scale operations.

Uplynk

3.9 out of 5

Uplynk

3.9 out of 5

SiteLock stands out for its advanced security, including threat detection, while Uplynk focuses on adaptive streaming with real-time analytics. In comparison, Uplynk's cost-effectiveness and integration appeal to streamers, whereas SiteLock's robust security features attract those prioritizing cybersecurity.

Download SiteLock vs. Uplynk Report

Pricing

SiteLock's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Uplynk offers a more variable pricing structure based on selected features, highlighting a key difference in approach.

View comparison

Pricing

SiteLock's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Uplynk offers a more variable pricing structure based on selected features, highlighting a key difference in approach.

Sucuri

4.2 out of 5

Sucuri

4.2 out of 5

Sucuri offers robust malware scanning and DDoS protection, making it ideal for specific security concerns. In comparison, SiteLock provides a comprehensive security suite with automated vulnerability management, appealing to enterprise users needing detailed security architecture and strategic deployment guidance.

Download SiteLock vs. Sucuri Report

Pricing

Sucuri has a straightforward setup cost, while SiteLock offers a varied pricing structure, highlighting differences in their pricing strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

Sucuri has a straightforward setup cost, while SiteLock offers a varied pricing structure, highlighting differences in their pricing strategies.

Comodo cWatch

4.8 out of 5

Comodo cWatch

4.8 out of 5

SiteLock offers automatic malware detection, removal, and backup, ideal for small business budgets. In comparison, Comodo cWatch provides comprehensive security with managed services for enterprises willing to invest in long-term protection. SiteLock's ease of use contrasts with Comodo's detailed security management.

Download Comodo cWatch vs. SiteLock Report

Pricing

SiteLock has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo cWatch, which offers more budget-friendly initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

SiteLock has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo cWatch, which offers more budget-friendly initial investment.

NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall

3.5 out of 5

NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall

3.5 out of 5

NSFOCUS understands how critical your web servers and applications are to your business and we have designed a closed-loop web application security solution to protect you from web attacks, data breaches and downtime. This solution includes website protection through our Web Application Firewall (WAF) and pro-active vulnerability assessment using our Web Vulnerability Scanning System (WVSS).

View comparison

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

CDN