Checkmarx One vs SiteLock comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Checkmarx and SiteLock are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SiteLock is ranked #47. Checkmarx holds a 8.3% mindshare in SAST, compared to SiteLock’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SiteLock users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

29,420 Views
17,064 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews

3,546 Views
887 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

SiteLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and SiteLock both compete in the realm of security solutions. Checkmarx One holds an advantage in advanced code scanning and technical support, while SiteLock offers greater ease of use and effective threat management.

Features: Checkmarx One offers advanced code scanning, seamless integrations, and support for various programming languages. SiteLock provides excellent malware detection, automatic site cleaning, and simple configuration.

Room for Improvement: Users of Checkmarx One mention its complex setup, the need for better reporting features, and simplification of its interface. SiteLock users suggest a need for enhanced customer support, extended features for broader security, and an improved user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One's deployment process is detailed and complex, yet its customer service is seen as highly responsive. SiteLock is known for a more straightforward deployment process, but its customer service sometimes lacks availability and depth.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One has higher setup costs but is praised for its strong return on investment through enhanced security and compliance. SiteLock is viewed as more affordable, balancing cost-effectiveness with improved site security, providing a satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,322 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th), AI Security (4th)

SiteLock

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

47th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (16th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (37th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 8.3%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	8.3%
SiteLock	0.6%
Other	91.1%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

it_user723534

Guitarist at a media company with self employed

It's not easy to get out once you're in

Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information. When you sign on for the paid service, Sitelock: * Hides (makes it difficult to find) that they default the auto-renew (you can't sign up without agreeing to have them automatically bill your credit card every year). * Hides (makes it difficult to find) how to stop auto-renew: * You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses. * You have to hunt their website for a link (in extremely small font) to the page which contains instructions for cancelling. * When you get to that page, turns out it's the 5000+ word "Terms of Service" document, which you have to scour to find a phone number. Then, you have to call and get put on hold (or if you like, they will call you back three days later). Once you finally get through, you have to jump through a lot of security hoops. All of the above, just to cancel the service. Their product may or may not be OK, but be forewarned that with Sitelock, it's not easy to get out once you're in.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Less false positive errors as compared to any other solution."

"It's been a very positive experience overall."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities, and they are always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database, so I am assured that when I am scanning my product those vulnerabilities are identified at very initial stages, giving my development team more time to react."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things, and it also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"We are using Checkmarx for analyzing threats."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted the organization by providing resolution strategies and indicating which vulnerabilities need to be fixed."

"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It seems to provide a bit of useful information on website health."

"Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue with my website, but with SiteLock I was able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches."

Cons

"Checkmarx is not good because it has too many false positive issues."

"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."

"They should make it more container-friendly and optimized for the CI pipeline. They should make it a little less heavy."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"Checkmarx One can be improved on the side of faster scans, especially when our CI pipelines are scanning for vulnerabilities."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"Meta data is always needed."

"We had to lock the number of CPUs used to not crash the Checkmarx Audit."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"The pricing is competitive and provides a lower TCO (total cost of ownership) for achieving application security."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 24% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Comodo cWatch vs SiteLock

Compared 12% of the time

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 12% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs SiteLock

Compared 11% of the time

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 6% of the time

Venusense Web Application Firewall vs SiteLock

Compared 4% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

September 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

September 2026

Download SiteLock product report

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

SiteLock provides web security solutions focused on safeguarding websites against cyber threats and vulnerabilities. It offers businesses an effective way to protect their online presence, ensuring that their data and customers are secure.

SiteLock is a versatile web security platform designed to address the diverse security needs of businesses. It features continuous monitoring, malware protection, and advanced threat detection to fortify website defenses. Businesses can rely on SiteLock to protect against malicious attacks, ensuring data integrity and customer trust. Its easy integration with existing systems makes it a preferred choice for enhancing website security without disruption.

What are the key features of SiteLock?

Website Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities and malware threats regularly.
Malware Removal: Automated tools to remove harmful content quickly.
Firewall: Blocks malicious traffic to safeguard against DDoS attacks.
PCI Compliance: Helps meet industry security standards with ease.

What benefits should users expect from SiteLock?

Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring for peace of mind.
Cost-Effective: Reduces expenses related to breach management.
Customer Trust: Protecting data enhances brand credibility.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration without workflow interruptions.

SiteLock is tailored for various industries, including retail, healthcare, and financial services. Retailers benefit from protecting payment processing systems, while healthcare providers ensure patient data security. Financial services use SiteLock for safeguarding sensitive information, making it an essential component of their data protection strategy.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock

September 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.