Checkmarx One vs SiteLock comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Checkmarx and SiteLock are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SiteLock is ranked #46. Checkmarx holds a 7.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to SiteLock’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SiteLock users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

31,996 Views
17,598 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews

4,200 Views
1,092 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

SiteLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and SiteLock both compete in the realm of security solutions. Checkmarx One holds an advantage in advanced code scanning and technical support, while SiteLock offers greater ease of use and effective threat management.

Features: Checkmarx One offers advanced code scanning, seamless integrations, and support for various programming languages. SiteLock provides excellent malware detection, automatic site cleaning, and simple configuration.

Room for Improvement: Users of Checkmarx One mention its complex setup, the need for better reporting features, and simplification of its interface. SiteLock users suggest a need for enhanced customer support, extended features for broader security, and an improved user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One's deployment process is detailed and complex, yet its customer service is seen as highly responsive. SiteLock is known for a more straightforward deployment process, but its customer service sometimes lacks availability and depth.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One has higher setup costs but is praised for its strong return on investment through enhanced security and compliance. SiteLock is viewed as more affordable, balancing cost-effectiveness with improved site security, providing a satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Vulnerability Management (13th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (7th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th), AI Security (4th)

SiteLock

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

46th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (16th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (37th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 7.8%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	7.8%
SiteLock	0.6%
Other	91.6%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

it_user723534

Guitarist at a media company with self employed

It's not easy to get out once you're in

Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information. When you sign on for the paid service, Sitelock: * Hides (makes it difficult to find) that they default the auto-renew (you can't sign up without agreeing to have them automatically bill your credit card every year). * Hides (makes it difficult to find) how to stop auto-renew: * You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses. * You have to hunt their website for a link (in extremely small font) to the page which contains instructions for cancelling. * When you get to that page, turns out it's the 5000+ word "Terms of Service" document, which you have to scour to find a phone number. Then, you have to call and get put on hold (or if you like, they will call you back three days later). Once you finally get through, you have to jump through a lot of security hoops. All of the above, just to cancel the service. Their product may or may not be OK, but be forewarned that with Sitelock, it's not easy to get out once you're in.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my opinion, Checkmarx gives better results, and its protection is better than SonarQube."

"The solution allows us to create custom rules for code checks."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"It can integrate very well with DAST solutions. So both of them are combined into an integrated solution for customers running application security."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

"It is very easy to insert the tool in the SDLC because there are a wide variety of ways to access the source-code, initiate scans, and review the results."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization, especially in our CI/CD integration, where when we try to build any feature, they are always scanned by Checkmarx before they get released."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It seems to provide a bit of useful information on website health."

"Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue with my website, but with SiteLock I was able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches."

Cons

"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"We can run only one project at a time."

"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it (if more then ~ 30 mb zip file provided - scan is crashes or takes a lot of time)."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"The license has a vague language around P1 issues and the associated support. Make sure to review these in order to align them with your organizational policies."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 20% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 11% of the time

Comodo cWatch vs SiteLock

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs SiteLock

Compared 10% of the time

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 6% of the time

ImmuniWeb vs SiteLock

Compared 4% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

November 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

October 2026

Download SiteLock product report

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

SiteLock provides web security solutions focused on safeguarding websites against cyber threats and vulnerabilities. It offers businesses an effective way to protect their online presence, ensuring that their data and customers are secure.

SiteLock is a versatile web security platform designed to address the diverse security needs of businesses. It features continuous monitoring, malware protection, and advanced threat detection to fortify website defenses. Businesses can rely on SiteLock to protect against malicious attacks, ensuring data integrity and customer trust. Its easy integration with existing systems makes it a preferred choice for enhancing website security without disruption.

What are the key features of SiteLock?

Website Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities and malware threats regularly.
Malware Removal: Automated tools to remove harmful content quickly.
Firewall: Blocks malicious traffic to safeguard against DDoS attacks.
PCI Compliance: Helps meet industry security standards with ease.

What benefits should users expect from SiteLock?

Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring for peace of mind.
Cost-Effective: Reduces expenses related to breach management.
Customer Trust: Protecting data enhances brand credibility.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration without workflow interruptions.

SiteLock is tailored for various industries, including retail, healthcare, and financial services. Retailers benefit from protecting payment processing systems, while healthcare providers ensure patient data security. Financial services use SiteLock for safeguarding sensitive information, making it an essential component of their data protection strategy.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock

November 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. SiteLock report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.