Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs SiteLock comparison

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), DevSecOps (2nd)

SiteLock

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

38th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (46th), CDN (15th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 1.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	2.0%
SiteLock	1.8%
Other	96.2%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

it_user723534

Guitarist at a media company with self employed

It's not easy to get out once you're in

Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information. When you sign on for the paid service, Sitelock: * Hides (makes it difficult to find) that they default the auto-renew (you can't sign up without agreeing to have them automatically bill your credit card every year). * Hides (makes it difficult to find) how to stop auto-renew: * You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses. * You have to hunt their website for a link (in extremely small font) to the page which contains instructions for cancelling. * When you get to that page, turns out it's the 5000+ word "Terms of Service" document, which you have to scour to find a phone number. Then, you have to call and get put on hold (or if you like, they will call you back three days later). Once you finally get through, you have to jump through a lot of security hoops. All of the above, just to cancel the service. Their product may or may not be OK, but be forewarned that with Sitelock, it's not easy to get out once you're in.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seamlessly protects through machine learning, giving us visibility into potential attacks and where they come from."

"The integration with other Microsoft products, especially Visual Studio, is seamless."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has improved our organization by providing protection against web application attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and bot threats."

"The communication between the on-premises device and the cloud for analysis and feedback is a valuable feature."

"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."

"We have prevented many potential threats that could be a major setback to our set goals."

"The price of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is not expensive, as it was the cheapest solution we found."

"I have thousands of exposed websites and APIs. Being able to control what is happening and try to prevent any attack is the best feature."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

"Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue with my website, but with SiteLock I was able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches."

"It seems to provide a bit of useful information on website health."

Cons

"The ease of use could be better."

"They might be able to add more integrations."

"Multi-tenancy is an area where Check Point has room for improvement."

"They need improved latency in the main window."

"Pricing and licensing are really expensive for this product. While it provides a very good security level, the price for each service is high."

"When I was working with the WAF platform, there were limitations, particularly concerning compliance and reporting."

"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."

"The solution should improve false-positives."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

"Sitelock may perform a useful service, but be wary of giving them your credit card information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

"You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

That's one of the most critical questions any development team faces! Securing a web application requires a layered approach, not a single tool. Here is a quick breakdown of what to recommend: In...

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Comodo cWatch vs SiteLock

Compared 13% of the time

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 13% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs SiteLock

Compared 12% of the time

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs SiteLock

Compared 5% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Download SiteLock product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

No data available

Overview

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

SiteLock provides web security solutions focused on safeguarding websites against cyber threats and vulnerabilities. It offers businesses an effective way to protect their online presence, ensuring that their data and customers are secure.

SiteLock is a versatile web security platform designed to address the diverse security needs of businesses. It features continuous monitoring, malware protection, and advanced threat detection to fortify website defenses. Businesses can rely on SiteLock to protect against malicious attacks, ensuring data integrity and customer trust. Its easy integration with existing systems makes it a preferred choice for enhancing website security without disruption.

What are the key features of SiteLock?

Website Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities and malware threats regularly.
Malware Removal: Automated tools to remove harmful content quickly.
Firewall: Blocks malicious traffic to safeguard against DDoS attacks.
PCI Compliance: Helps meet industry security standards with ease.

What benefits should users expect from SiteLock?

Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring for peace of mind.
Cost-Effective: Reduces expenses related to breach management.
Customer Trust: Protecting data enhances brand credibility.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration without workflow interruptions.

SiteLock is tailored for various industries, including retail, healthcare, and financial services. Retailers benefit from protecting payment processing systems, while healthcare providers ensure patient data security. Financial services use SiteLock for safeguarding sensitive information, making it an essential component of their data protection strategy.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs. SiteLock