• Home
  • Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. SiteLock

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs SiteLock comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cloudflare Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Read 16 Cloudflare Web Application Firewall reviews
8,483 views|6,180 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
SiteLock Logo
SiteLock
Read 3 SiteLock reviews
434 views|340 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and SiteLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
JaanAnvelt
A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules
The solution prevented several attacks, such as Log4j two years ago when it emerged as a major vulnerability. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall... Read more →
Anonymous User
Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security...
I run several personal websites and after getting hacked on one of them I found SiteLock. Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
  • "The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
  • "Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."

    • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

    • More SiteLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
    Top Answer:The product has a valuable security control functionality.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Ap...
    Top Answer:Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.
    Read all 10 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?
    Top Answer:The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    8,483
    Comparisons
    6,180
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    31st
    out of 82 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    434
    Comparisons
    340
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloudflare WAF
    Learn More
    Cloudflare
    SiteLock
    Overview

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

    Sample Customers
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 16 reviews while SiteLock is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while SiteLock is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai App and API Protector, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas SiteLock is most compared with Sucuri, Cloudflare, AWS WAF, Imperva DDoS and Comodo cWatch.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.