• Home
  • SiteLock vs. Sucuri

SiteLock vs Sucuri comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SiteLock Logo

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews
432 views|340 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Sucuri Security Logo

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews
1,000 views|710 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SiteLock and Sucuri based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security...
I run several personal websites and after getting hacked on one of them I found SiteLock. Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue... Read more →
Will Alfaro
Effectively prevents security risks and hacking attempts on websites, providing robust protection
The main benefit is that my site developers are not experienced people. The solution provides me with peace of mind because it protects my site... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You can't just stop auto-renew from your billing panel, the way you can with reputable businesses."

    • More SiteLock Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I’d simply say it’s really worth it."
  • "Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."
  • "The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."
  • "It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

    • More Sucuri Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
    Top Answer:In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application… more »
    Read all 15 answers   →
    What do you like most about Sucuri?
    Top Answer:The initial setup was very easy.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?
    Top Answer:The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Sucuri?
    Top Answer:The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    30th
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    432
    Comparisons
    340
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    21st
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    1,000
    Comparisons
    710
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Cloudflare logo
    Cloudflare vs. SiteLock
    Compared 34% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    AWS WAF vs. SiteLock
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Imperva DDoS logo
    Imperva DDoS vs. SiteLock
    Compared 13% of the time.
    More SiteLock Competitors   →
    Cloudflare logo
    Cloudflare vs. Sucuri
    Compared 34% of the time.
    AWS WAF logo
    AWS WAF vs. Sucuri
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Comodo cWatch logo
    Comodo cWatch vs. Sucuri
    Compared 7% of the time.
    StackPath WAF logo
    StackPath WAF vs. Sucuri
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Imperva DDoS logo
    Imperva DDoS vs. Sucuri
    Compared 6% of the time.
    More Sucuri Competitors   →
    Learn More
    SiteLock
    Sucuri Security
    Overview

    Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

    Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.
    Sample Customers
    galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com
    The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Media Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise27%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SiteLock is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Sucuri is ranked 21st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 6 reviews. SiteLock is rated 6.6, while Sucuri is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SiteLock writes "Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sucuri writes "Simple solution and good WAF". SiteLock is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF and Imperva DDoS, whereas Sucuri is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF, Comodo cWatch, StackPath WAF and Imperva DDoS.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors and best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.