Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo

Top 10 Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Alternatives

Vendor: Securonix Solutions
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Securonix Next-Gen SIEM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM surpasses its competitors by utilizing advanced machine learning for threat detection and providing real-time analytics, enabling proactive identification and neutralization of security threats, which ensures superior security posture and operational efficiency for enterprises.

Securonix Solutions Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Securonix Solutions, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM stands out with behavioral analytics and strong cloud integration, appealing to those prioritizing cloud monitoring. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in real-time threat detection and advanced endpoint protection, attracting buyers needing robust threat intelligence and comprehensive security measures.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM incurs higher setup costs compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, highlighting significant pricing differences between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM incurs higher setup costs compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, highlighting significant pricing differences between the two.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Securonix offers robust user behavior insights and cloud monitoring, enhancing enterprise threat detection with customizable threat models. In comparison, Wazuh integrates seamlessly with cloud environments, favoring flexibility and cost-effectiveness due to its open-source nature, ideal for scalable deployments.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Wazuh Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, appealing to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, appealing to cost-conscious users.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels with UEBA capabilities ideal for behavioral monitoring, offering a stable pricing model. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security supports extensive integrations with data volume-based pricing, suited for organizations needing flexible deployments and comprehensive security analytics.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Splunk Enterprise Security, though, can be more financially demanding at the start.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Splunk Enterprise Security, though, can be more financially demanding at the start.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in feature breadth, offering advanced threat detection and user behavior analytics, making it appealing for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's seamless integration with Microsoft products and cloud-native capabilities makes it ideal for organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive integration with Azure services, whereas Securonix emphasizes advanced threat detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive integration with Azure services, whereas Securonix emphasizes advanced threat detection capabilities.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in on-premises environments with advanced correlation, centralized data collection, and extensive third-party integrations. In comparison, Securonix focuses on cloud solutions, offering user behavior analytics and machine learning for sophisticated threat detection, appealing to tech buyers seeking cloud efficiency and advanced analytics.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
IBM Security QRadar incurs a moderate setup cost, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher initial investment. QRadar offers a more cost-effective entry point compared to Securonix, which may be suited for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar incurs a moderate setup cost, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher initial investment. QRadar offers a more cost-effective entry point compared to Securonix, which may be suited for larger enterprises.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Securonix's advanced threat detection and machine learning integration contrast with Elastic Security's powerful search functionalities and flexibility. In comparison, Elastic Security provides extensive integration options, whereas Securonix excels in automation, making it appealing for different organizational needs and preferences.
Download Elastic Security vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is praised for its transparent setup costs, while Elastic Security users highlight its affordability and quick implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is praised for its transparent setup costs, while Elastic Security users highlight its affordability and quick implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Securonix focuses on advanced threat detection with user behavior analytics and flexible pricing based on users. In comparison, Varonis emphasizes data governance and compliance with a focus on sensitive data protection, offering robust support despite higher costs associated with its per-module pricing model.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Varonis Platform Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers competitive setup costs, while Varonis Platform may have a more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers competitive setup costs, while Varonis Platform may have a more substantial initial investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in robust analytics and flexible deployment, offering extensive insights into user behavior. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM utilizes machine learning for threat detection and integrates across networks and endpoints, providing a centralized security solution.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has lower initial setup costs, while Cortex XSIAM involves higher setup expenses, providing more comprehensive integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has lower initial setup costs, while Cortex XSIAM involves higher setup expenses, providing more comprehensive integration features.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers strong threat detection and integrates well with other security tools. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR excels with user-friendly threat intelligence and automated response features. Rapid7 InsightIDR provides straightforward deployment, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a more complex setup but competitive pricing.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR. Additionally, Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a quicker deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR. Additionally, Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a quicker deployment process.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is known for advanced analytics and user-friendly configuration. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM excels in log management and detailed forensic analysis. Securonix's ease of deployment contrasts with LogRhythm's complex setup, while both offer strong customer support and notable ROI.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost compared to LogRhythm SIEM, making Securonix more attractive for budget-conscious organizations. However, LogRhythm SIEM's setup is described as straightforward, balancing the higher initial investment with ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost compared to LogRhythm SIEM, making Securonix more attractive for budget-conscious organizations. However, LogRhythm SIEM's setup is described as straightforward, balancing the higher initial investment with ease of deployment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Securonix offers comprehensive features and strong customer support, making it ideal for users seeking advanced analytics and detailed threat detection. In comparison, Cynet provides a more cost-effective and easier deployment, appealing to buyers requiring an all-in-one security solution with straightforward implementation.
Download Cynet vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a high initial setup cost while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a high initial setup cost while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Saviynt
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Saviynt
3.7 out of 5
Securonix excels in threat detection and behavioral analytics, ideal for cloud integration. In comparison, Saviynt focuses on identity governance, managing access risks with robust enterprise ecosystem integration. Securonix appeals through its advanced threat features, while Saviynt attracts with its comprehensive identity lifecycle management.
Download Saviynt vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost than Saviynt. Saviynt may require a higher initial investment compared to Securonix.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost than Saviynt. Saviynt may require a higher initial investment compared to Securonix.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Microsoft Defender for Identity
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors Active Directory, alerts on suspicious behavior, analyzes user behavior, and detects malicious activities. Organizations secure identities by managing endpoint detection and integrating with cloud services, benefiting from real-time analytics, threat intelligence, and automation. Improved integration with on-prem applications and enhanced threat intelligence alignment are needed.
Download Microsoft Defender for Identity vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Defender for Identity is a little more expensive than other Microsoft products. Identity and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are both a bit costly.
It is very affordable considering that other SIEM solutions are much more expensive and have many more licensing restrictions and fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Defender for Identity is a little more expensive than other Microsoft products. Identity and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are both a bit costly.
It is very affordable considering that other SIEM solutions are much more expensive and have many more licensing restrictions and fees.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM stands out with cutting-edge analytics and flexible integrations ideal for advanced threat management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM offers a comprehensive feature set and scalability to support complex environments, making it a robust choice for broad integration and asset discovery tasks.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiSIEM incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting the cost disparity in their implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiSIEM incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting the cost disparity in their implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in customer support and competitive pricing, focusing on advanced threat detection and behavioral analytics. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers extensive features, scalability, and fast query performance. Securonix provides higher customer service marks, while Google Chronicle ensures a straightforward deployment process.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM incurs significant setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite offers comparatively lower setup expenses. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a substantial initial investment, whereas Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective at the setup stage.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM incurs significant setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite offers comparatively lower setup expenses. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a substantial initial investment, whereas Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective at the setup stage.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is favored for its advanced analytics and robust threat detection features, making it ideal for identifying complex threats. In comparison, Exabeam is appreciated for its integration with multiple platforms and ease of deployment, offering a smoother setup experience.
Download Exabeam vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in threat detection, behavioral analytics, and automated response. In comparison, Coralogix is noted for real-time analytics, machine learning insights, and scalability. Securonix users highlight needed improvements in log management and reporting, while Coralogix could enhance documentation and alert control. Securonix requires complex deployment and expertise, contrasted by Coralogix's straightforward setup and responsive support. Securonix offers robust performance but higher initial costs, whereas Coralogix provides competitive pricing and faster ROI.
Download Coralogix vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs compared to Coralogix, highlighting a more substantial initial investment required for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs compared to Coralogix, highlighting a more substantial initial investment required for implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5

Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with advanced analytics and integrations. Its valuable features include AI-driven insights and real-time monitoring. Some users point to room for improvement in deployment processes and customizability to better align with diverse industry needs.

Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced threat detection and UEBA with strong integration capabilities. In comparison, USM Anywhere focuses on unified security management and automated responses. Securonix needs better reporting tools, while USM Anywhere requires more flexible customization options. USM Anywhere delivers better customer service and streamlined deployment.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. USM Anywhere Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a moderate setup cost, while USM Anywhere features a lower initial setup cost, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a moderate setup cost, while USM Anywhere features a lower initial setup cost, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Securonix is recognized for advanced threat detection and behavior analytics, making it ideal for detailed analytics. In comparison, Devo is noted for its scalability and real-time analytics, catering to large environments. Securonix users prefer its robust support, while Devo excels in ease of deployment.
Download Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup cost is perceived as higher due to its advanced analytics capabilities, while Devo offers a more affordable setup, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup cost is perceived as higher due to its advanced analytics capabilities, while Devo offers a more affordable setup, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious organizations.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers robust threat detection and response features. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security excels in scalability and integration capabilities, making it adaptable to various environments. Securonix requires extensive setup, whereas Sumo Logic's cloud-native architecture simplifies deployment and lowers costs.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's setup cost is reported as high, while Sumo Logic Security offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's setup cost is reported as high, while Sumo Logic Security offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in the initial investment required.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced analytics, UEBA, and flexible cloud integration, ideal for cloud-centric environments seeking accurate threat detection. In comparison, OpenText Enterprise Security Manager focuses on integration capabilities, suitable for organizations prioritizing stable, on-premises solutions with strong correlation features.
Download OpenText Enterprise Security Manager vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM involves a significant setup cost compared to OpenText Enterprise Security Manager, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a primary difference in their financial impact on organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM involves a significant setup cost compared to OpenText Enterprise Security Manager, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a primary difference in their financial impact on organizations.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in real-time threat detection and robust analytics. In comparison, Google Security Operations offers extensive cloud integration and automated incident response. A tech buyer might choose Securonix for customization, while Google's solution is ideal for seamless integration with Google Cloud.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers a lower setup cost compared to Google Security Operations, which may be beneficial for organizations with budget constraints. However, Google Security Operations provides broader integration capabilities, potentially justifying its higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers a lower setup cost compared to Google Security Operations, which may be beneficial for organizations with budget constraints. However, Google Security Operations provides broader integration capabilities, potentially justifying its higher initial expense.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform excels in deployment efficiency and customer service, making it a choice for those who need quick setup and reliable assistance. In comparison, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced analytics and machine learning, making it ideal for maximizing security effectiveness.
Download NetWitness Platform vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
NetWitness Platform has a lower initial setup cost, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform has a lower initial setup cost, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher upfront investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in support and pricing for those valuing cost-effectiveness and usability. In comparison, Trellix ESM offers a broader feature set and comprehensive security capabilities. Securonix is user-friendly in deployment, while Trellix ESM, though complex, justifies its higher cost with robust features.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in the implementation expenses of both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in the implementation expenses of both solutions.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Netsurion
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Netsurion
4.2 out of 5
Securonix excels in advanced threat analysis with sophisticated detection capabilities and extensive integration options. In comparison, Netsurion is appreciated for its comprehensive network security, robust monitoring, and compliance management. Securonix offers considerable ROI through advanced features, whereas Netsurion provides cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment.
Download Netsurion vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs, while Netsurion offers more affordable setup options. Securonix may require more budget allocation upfront compared to Netsurion.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs, while Netsurion offers more affordable setup options. Securonix may require more budget allocation upfront compared to Netsurion.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
DNIF HYPERCLOUD
3.8 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers robust analytics and user behavior monitoring, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing these features. In comparison, DNIF HYPERCLOUD provides impressive scalability and real-time data processing. Securonix excels in pricing and customer support, while DNIF is preferred for advanced features and flexibility.
Download DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup cost is significant, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup cost is significant, while DNIF HYPERCLOUD offers a more cost-effective setup.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is known for its advanced analytics and integration capabilities. In comparison, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform focuses on comprehensive threat detection and automated response. Securonix appeals with its user-friendly design, while Seceon is chosen for real-time threat analysis and automated remediation.
Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, making Seceon the more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, making Seceon the more budget-friendly option.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Hunters
4.0 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Hunters
4.0 out of 5

Hunters Security Operations Platform is a Human-Driven, AI-Powered SIEM alternative that revolutionize the way SOCs operate. Hunters automates the entire TDIR process, replacing repetitive human work with machine-powered detection, enrichment, correlation, prioritization and investigation, freeing analysts to proactively protect their organizations. Hunters utilizes an open security data lake architecture, ensuring complete and cost effective coverage of the entire security stack.

Watch a demo
View comparison

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
AI Security