Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo

Top 10 Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Alternatives

Vendor: Securonix Solutions
4.3 out of 5
1,870 followers
Start review

Top Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Securonix Next-Gen SIEM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Microsoft Sentinel, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM surpasses its competitors by leveraging advanced analytics and machine learning to provide real-time threat detection and streamlined incident response, delivering unmatched visibility and adaptability in cybersecurity management.

Securonix Solutions Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Securonix Solutions, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers comprehensive support services and enhanced deployment efficiency. In comparison, Wazuh is cost-effective with robust feature sets. Securonix excels in advanced threat detection and broader integration, whereas Wazuh provides flexibility and extensive community support. Pricing reflects Securonix's advanced features versus Wazuh's high ROI.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Wazuh Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a high initial setup cost, while Wazuh offers a lower setup cost, making it more accessible.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a high initial setup cost, while Wazuh offers a lower setup cost, making it more accessible.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in feature breadth, offering advanced threat detection and user behavior analytics, making it appealing for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's seamless integration with Microsoft products and cloud-native capabilities makes it ideal for organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive integration with Azure services, whereas Securonix emphasizes advanced threat detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive integration with Azure services, whereas Securonix emphasizes advanced threat detection capabilities.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Securonix excels in behavioral analytics and ease of use. In comparison, Splunk offers flexibility with data sources and advanced customizability, making it ideal for complex environments. Securonix serves cloud-focused organizations, while Splunk benefits those prioritizing extensive data analytics and integration.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup costs are significantly lower, while Splunk Enterprise Security's setup costs are higher. This difference highlights the cost-effectiveness of Securonix when comparing initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup costs are significantly lower, while Splunk Enterprise Security's setup costs are higher. This difference highlights the cost-effectiveness of Securonix when comparing initial investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers scalability and comprehensive monitoring, appealing to enterprises needing rapid security insights. In comparison, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM focuses on behavior analytics and affordability, benefiting those seeking cost-effective solutions with strong cloud integration.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
IBM Security QRadar has a lower setup cost compared to Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, highlighting a significant price advantage for budget-conscious implementations. Securonix, while potentially offering more diverse features, requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a lower setup cost compared to Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, highlighting a significant price advantage for budget-conscious implementations. Securonix, while potentially offering more diverse features, requires a higher initial investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Securonix's advanced threat detection and machine learning integration contrast with Elastic Security's powerful search functionalities and flexibility. In comparison, Elastic Security provides extensive integration options, whereas Securonix excels in automation, making it appealing for different organizational needs and preferences.
Download Elastic Security vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is praised for its transparent setup costs, while Elastic Security users highlight its affordability and quick implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is praised for its transparent setup costs, while Elastic Security users highlight its affordability and quick implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is known for advanced analytics and user-friendly configuration. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM excels in log management and detailed forensic analysis. Securonix's ease of deployment contrasts with LogRhythm's complex setup, while both offer strong customer support and notable ROI.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost compared to LogRhythm SIEM, making Securonix more attractive for budget-conscious organizations. However, LogRhythm SIEM's setup is described as straightforward, balancing the higher initial investment with ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost compared to LogRhythm SIEM, making Securonix more attractive for budget-conscious organizations. However, LogRhythm SIEM's setup is described as straightforward, balancing the higher initial investment with ease of deployment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers strong threat detection and integrates well with other security tools. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR excels with user-friendly threat intelligence and automated response features. Rapid7 InsightIDR provides straightforward deployment, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a more complex setup but competitive pricing.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR. Additionally, Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a quicker deployment process.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has higher setup costs compared to Rapid7 InsightIDR. Additionally, Rapid7 InsightIDR offers a quicker deployment process.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Securonix offers comprehensive features and strong customer support, making it ideal for users seeking advanced analytics and detailed threat detection. In comparison, Cynet provides a more cost-effective and easier deployment, appealing to buyers requiring an all-in-one security solution with straightforward implementation.
Download Cynet vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a high initial setup cost while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a high initial setup cost while Cynet offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in robust analytics and flexible deployment, offering extensive insights into user behavior. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM utilizes machine learning for threat detection and integrates across networks and endpoints, providing a centralized security solution.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has lower initial setup costs, while Cortex XSIAM involves higher setup expenses, providing more comprehensive integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has lower initial setup costs, while Cortex XSIAM involves higher setup expenses, providing more comprehensive integration features.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM stands out with cutting-edge analytics and flexible integrations ideal for advanced threat management. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM offers a comprehensive feature set and scalability to support complex environments, making it a robust choice for broad integration and asset discovery tasks.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiSIEM incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting the cost disparity in their implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, while Fortinet FortiSIEM incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting the cost disparity in their implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers robust threat detection and response features. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security excels in scalability and integration capabilities, making it adaptable to various environments. Securonix requires extensive setup, whereas Sumo Logic's cloud-native architecture simplifies deployment and lowers costs.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's setup cost is reported as high, while Sumo Logic Security offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM's setup cost is reported as high, while Sumo Logic Security offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a significant difference in the initial investment required.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
4.0 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in customer support and competitive pricing, focusing on advanced threat detection and behavioral analytics. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers extensive features, scalability, and fast query performance. Securonix provides higher customer service marks, while Google Chronicle ensures a straightforward deployment process.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM incurs significant setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite offers comparatively lower setup expenses. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a substantial initial investment, whereas Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective at the setup stage.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM incurs significant setup costs, while Google Chronicle Suite offers comparatively lower setup expenses. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a substantial initial investment, whereas Google Chronicle Suite is more cost-effective at the setup stage.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is favored for its advanced analytics and robust threat detection features, making it ideal for identifying complex threats. In comparison, Exabeam is appreciated for its integration with multiple platforms and ease of deployment, offering a smoother setup experience.
Download Exabeam vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Exabeam, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced threat detection and UEBA with strong integration capabilities. In comparison, USM Anywhere focuses on unified security management and automated responses. Securonix needs better reporting tools, while USM Anywhere requires more flexible customization options. USM Anywhere delivers better customer service and streamlined deployment.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. USM Anywhere Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a moderate setup cost, while USM Anywhere features a lower initial setup cost, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a moderate setup cost, while USM Anywhere features a lower initial setup cost, highlighting a key difference in upfront investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Securonix is recognized for advanced threat detection and behavior analytics, making it ideal for detailed analytics. In comparison, Devo is noted for its scalability and real-time analytics, catering to large environments. Securonix users prefer its robust support, while Devo excels in ease of deployment.
Download Devo vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup cost is perceived as higher due to its advanced analytics capabilities, while Devo offers a more affordable setup, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup cost is perceived as higher due to its advanced analytics capabilities, while Devo offers a more affordable setup, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious organizations.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with automated incident response and centralized data correlation. Its seamless integration provides visibility and management. Advanced analytics and machine learning identify threats efficiently. Users appreciate its integration, real-time detection, and automation but suggest better third-party integration, documentation, and more intuitive setup.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels with strong machine learning algorithms and anomaly detection. In comparison, ArcSight ESM is recognized for its comprehensive rule-based engine and data correlation. Securonix offers quicker ROI with competitive pricing, while ArcSight ESM justifies its higher cost with extensive features and long-term ROI.
Download ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, while ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a lower setup cost, while ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) has a higher initial investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform excels in deployment efficiency and customer service, making it a choice for those who need quick setup and reliable assistance. In comparison, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM offers advanced analytics and machine learning, making it ideal for maximizing security effectiveness.
Download NetWitness Platform vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
NetWitness Platform has a lower initial setup cost, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform has a lower initial setup cost, while Securonix Next-Gen SIEM requires a higher upfront investment.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in support and pricing for those valuing cost-effectiveness and usability. In comparison, Trellix ESM offers a broader feature set and comprehensive security capabilities. Securonix is user-friendly in deployment, while Trellix ESM, though complex, justifies its higher cost with robust features.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Trellix ESM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in the implementation expenses of both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Trellix ESM offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a significant difference in the implementation expenses of both solutions.
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Logo
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform
3.9 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is known for its advanced analytics and integration capabilities. In comparison, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform focuses on comprehensive threat detection and automated response. Securonix appeals with its user-friendly design, while Seceon is chosen for real-time threat analysis and automated remediation.
Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, making Seceon the more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost compared to Seceon Open Threat Management Platform, making Seceon the more budget-friendly option.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
Log Management