Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
SAS Data Management Logo

Top 10 SAS Data Management Alternatives

Vendor: SAS
4.2 out of 5
1,060 followers
Start review

Top SAS Data Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SAS Data Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Informatica PowerCenter, and Microsoft Purview Data Governance. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SAS Data Management surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive data integration, high-quality data governance, robust data transformation, and advanced analytics capabilities that enable organizations to effectively manage, integrate, and analyze data for improved decision-making and operational efficiency.

SAS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SAS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC offers comprehensive cloud-based data management with flexible integration, suiting large businesses. In comparison, SAS Data Management excels in data analytics and provides accessible smaller-scale solutions with strong technical support, ideal for firms focused on powerful analytics and on-premises deployment.
Download Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs. SAS Data Management Report
Informatica IDMC offers a cost-effective setup compared to the higher setup costs associated with SAS Data Management, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica IDMC offers a cost-effective setup compared to the higher setup costs associated with SAS Data Management, highlighting a significant cost difference.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter attracts tech buyers with its lower initial cost and ease of deployment. In comparison, SAS Data Management appeals due to its advanced analytics and long-term ROI benefits, offering superior features despite a more complex setup than Informatica.
Download Informatica PowerCenter vs. SAS Data Management Report
Informatica PowerCenter incurs higher setup costs, while SAS Data Management offers a more budget-friendly option. These differences highlight distinct pricing approaches between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter incurs higher setup costs, while SAS Data Management offers a more budget-friendly option. These differences highlight distinct pricing approaches between the two solutions.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Governance
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Management excels in ETL and data integration suitable for heavy processing tasks. In comparison, Microsoft Purview emphasizes data governance and compliance with strong Azure integration, making it ideal for multi-cloud strategies. SAS is costlier, while Purview offers flexible, competitive pricing.
Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management offers a cost-effective setup solution while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is known for its higher initial expenses. The contrasting setup costs highlight the difference in entry investment required for each data management solution.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management offers a cost-effective setup solution while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is known for its higher initial expenses. The contrasting setup costs highlight the difference in entry investment required for each data management solution.
SAS Data Management Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SSIS is favored for cost-efficiency and ease of use for basic tasks. In comparison, SAS Data Management offers advanced analytics for complex projects. While SSIS provides seamless Microsoft integration, SAS supports diverse data sources, justifying higher costs with extensive capabilities for in-depth analysis.
Download SAS Data Management vs. SSIS Report
SSIS generally offers a lower setup cost compared to SAS Data Management, which can be significantly higher, highlighting a distinction in initial investment between the two data management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SSIS generally offers a lower setup cost compared to SAS Data Management, which can be significantly higher, highlighting a distinction in initial investment between the two data management solutions.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator provides extensive ELT customization and real-time integration for diverse needs, but users may face a steep learning curve. In comparison, SAS Data Management excels in data quality management and ease of use, particularly appealing to those less experienced with coding.
Download Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. SAS Data Management Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) setup costs are often highlighted as being lower than SAS Data Management, which tends to require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) setup costs are often highlighted as being lower than SAS Data Management, which tends to require a higher initial investment.
SAS Data Management Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Management excels in ETL capabilities and data governance, appealing to enterprises needing robust analytics. In comparison, Palantir Foundry offers superior data visualization and real-time integration, ideal for tech platforms requiring comprehensive data visibility and security features.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. SAS Data Management Report
Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated.
It's expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated.
It's expensive.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Management excels in comprehensive data management and ease of use, even for non-technical users. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere DataStage is ideal for ETL processes with parallel processing for scalability. SAS faces cost challenges, while IBM needs improved cloud integration.
Download IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management entails a moderate setup cost, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage presents a higher initial expense. The notable difference in setup investments could impact budget considerations for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management entails a moderate setup cost, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage presents a higher initial expense. The notable difference in setup investments could impact budget considerations for potential users.
SAS Data Management Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
Talend Open Studio
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Management excels in scalability and comprehensive data handling, making it suitable for enterprises with complex data operations. In comparison, Talend Open Studio provides a user-friendly, open-source ETL platform, ideal for smaller businesses and developers needing flexible integration.
Download SAS Data Management vs. Talend Open Studio Report
SAS Data Management involves a higher setup cost compared to Talend Open Studio, which offers a more budget-friendly initialization. These solutions differ significantly in terms of initial financial investment required for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management involves a higher setup cost compared to Talend Open Studio, which offers a more budget-friendly initialization. These solutions differ significantly in terms of initial financial investment required for deployment.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Governance
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Management is valued for its robust ETL capabilities, providing a comprehensive suite ideal for complex data manipulation. In comparison, Collibra Governance offers advanced governance features with strong data lineage and collaboration options, appealing to those prioritizing flexibility and metadata management.
Download Collibra Governance vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management's setup cost is higher compared to Collibra Governance, which offers more competitive pricing. The emphasis is on cost-efficiency for organizations prioritizing budget management with Collibra's initial setup cost advantage.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management's setup cost is higher compared to Collibra Governance, which offers more competitive pricing. The emphasis is on cost-efficiency for organizations prioritizing budget management with Collibra's initial setup cost advantage.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAP Data Services offers significant integration with SAP systems, making it ideal for environments heavily relying on SAP. In comparison, SAS Data Management provides flexible data importing/exporting and robust language capabilities, appealing to users seeking comprehensive data analysis from diverse sources.
Download SAP Data Services vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAP Data Services offers flexible setup costs while SAS Data Management demands a more substantial initial investment, distinguishing their approaches to pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Data Services offers flexible setup costs while SAS Data Management demands a more substantial initial investment, distinguishing their approaches to pricing structure.
SAS Data Management Logo
Qlik Replicate
4.1 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
Qlik Replicate
4.1 out of 5
Qlik Replicate excels in real-time data replication and CDC with minimal impact. In comparison, SAS Data Management provides extensive data management options and flexibility in data integration. Tech buyers may choose Qlik for performance or SAS for comprehensive data capabilities.
Download Qlik Replicate vs. SAS Data Management Report
Qlik Replicate has a relatively lower setup cost, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious users, while SAS Data Management involves a higher initial investment, potentially aligning better with enterprises seeking more comprehensive data management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Qlik Replicate has a relatively lower setup cost, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious users, while SAS Data Management involves a higher initial investment, potentially aligning better with enterprises seeking more comprehensive data management capabilities.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Alation Data Catalog
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Management focuses on data integration, providing robust analysis tools and strong ROI in regulated industries. In comparison, Alation Data Catalog emphasizes active data governance and easier setup, appealing to organizations needing hybrid cloud deployment and flexible pricing despite limited data lineage features.
Download Alation Data Catalog vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management involves a higher setup cost compared to Alation Data Catalog, where the latter offers a more initial cost-effective option with potentially faster implementation for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management involves a higher setup cost compared to Alation Data Catalog, where the latter offers a more initial cost-effective option with potentially faster implementation for budget-conscious organizations.
SAS Data Management Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
FME
4.3 out of 5
SAS Data Management provides excellent integration with strong governance and quality control suitable for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, FME excels in spatial data handling and extensive transformations, ideal for industries needing geo-processing and versatile data format management.
Download FME vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management has a complex setup cost structure, whereas FME offers a simpler and more straightforward fee. SAS might require a higher initial investment compared to FME, which could impact budget considerations for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management has a complex setup cost structure, whereas FME offers a simpler and more straightforward fee. SAS might require a higher initial investment compared to FME, which could impact budget considerations for businesses.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
3.9 out of 5
SAS Data Management is preferred for its pricing and intuitive interface, supporting ETL and data integration. In comparison, IBM Cloud Pak offers a broader feature set with Watson Studio and hybrid cloud flexibility, ideal for enterprises prioritizing AI integration and extensive data governance.
Download IBM Cloud Pak for Data vs. SAS Data Management Report
I think that this product is too expensive for smaller companies.
Cloud Pak's cost is a little high.
View comparison
Pricing
I think that this product is too expensive for smaller companies.
Cloud Pak's cost is a little high.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Talend Data Management Platform
4.1 out of 5
Talend Data Management Platform offers versatility with its open-source ETL transformations and numerous connectors. In comparison, SAS Data Management excels in comprehensive analytics capabilities. Talend appeals for its cost-effectiveness and deployment flexibility, while SAS attracts buyers with its advanced data integration and cleaning functionalities.
Download SAS Data Management vs. Talend Data Management Platform Report
Talend Data Management Platform's setup cost is competitive, while SAS Data Management incurs a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Talend Data Management Platform's setup cost is competitive, while SAS Data Management incurs a higher initial investment.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System
4.5 out of 5
Ab Initio often leads with strong scalability and advanced data processing. In comparison, SAS Data Management is noted for its versatile analytics features, making it suitable for comprehensive solutions. Ab Initio attracts those needing performance, while SAS appeals with broader features and easier deployment.
Download Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. SAS Data Management Report
Ab Initio Co>Operating System typically incurs a higher setup cost than SAS Data Management, which is more budget-friendly for initial deployment. This distinction highlights Ab Initio's potential for complex infrastructure investments.
View comparison
Pricing
Ab Initio Co>Operating System typically incurs a higher setup cost than SAS Data Management, which is more budget-friendly for initial deployment. This distinction highlights Ab Initio's potential for complex infrastructure investments.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
erwin Data Intelligence by Quest
4.3 out of 5
SAS Data Management provides strong data integration and analytics, ideal for extensive operations. In comparison, erwin Data Intelligence excels in metadata management and lineage, beneficial for data governance. SAS focuses on integration versatility, while erwin emphasizes automation and metadata handling.
Download SAS Data Management vs. erwin Data Intelligence by Quest Report
SAS Data Management's setup cost is user-friendly, whereas erwin Data Intelligence by Quest offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management's setup cost is user-friendly, whereas erwin Data Intelligence by Quest offers a more flexible pricing structure.
SAS Data Management Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
SAS Data Management offers strong data management tools and robust enterprise integration, ideal for regulated industries due to its accuracy and scalability. In comparison, Qlik Compose excels in automation and real-time replication, providing simplified cloud deployments and a focus on data modeling efficiency.
Download Qlik Compose vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management involves a substantial setup cost, while Qlik Compose offers a more economical alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management involves a substantial setup cost, while Qlik Compose offers a more economical alternative.
SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Lineage
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Lineage
4.0 out of 5
SAS Data Management effectively supports complex analytical tasks on various platforms, excelling in ETL and data governance. In comparison, Collibra Lineage simplifies data management via strong data lineage capabilities and broad integration options, appealing to buyers prioritizing automation and flexible deployment.
Download Collibra Lineage vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management's setup cost is noted for its high initial expenditure, while Collibra Lineage offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting significant financial differences between these data management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management's setup cost is noted for its high initial expenditure, while Collibra Lineage offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting significant financial differences between these data management solutions.
SAS Data Management Logo
SAS Data Management Logo
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform
4.5 out of 5
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform appeals with competitive pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, SAS Data Management attracts those needing extensive analytics and data integration tools. Protegrity’s ease of deployment suits quick protection needs; SAS offers a comprehensive approach for complex data environments.
Download Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs. SAS Data Management Report
Protegrity's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its advanced security features, whereas SAS Data Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it attractive for those prioritizing affordability over extensive security measures.
View comparison
Pricing
Protegrity's setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its advanced security features, whereas SAS Data Management offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it attractive for those prioritizing affordability over extensive security measures.

Related categories

Data Integration
Data Quality
Data Governance