Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs SAS Data Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Information Protection and SAS Data Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Governance Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can restrict access or specify who can see sensitivity labels, which can be based on the classification level. We can encrypt restricted content and limit who can see that from an internal view, too, so Purview is a powerful tool.""It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.""Incorporating data loss prevention capabilities built into the Microsoft platform to endpoints, such as Windows 10 and Windows 11 computers, can also help prevent data loss and is highly advantageous.""Before using it, we had a lot of unlabeled data, and the tool helped us quickly and accurately label a large number of documents.""The UI is user-friendly, and I have observed that it improves further each year."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Pros →

"If you compare it to SQL, the memory and development times are very quick.""I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.""The product offers very good flexibility.""Its robustness is valuable. It is a full-fledged suite. We have a data warehouse model, and there are also a lot of data quality management tools. The repository and all other tools are there. So, it is a full package in terms of reporting tools.""The tool is reliable, quick, and powerful.""The solution is very stable. We haven't faced any issues with glitches or bugs. We haven't had any crashes.""In terms of which features I have found most valuable, I would say the importing and exporting features. Additionally, the data sorting, categorizing and summarizing features, especially how it can summarize based on categories. These are the key features.""The technical support is excellent."

More SAS Data Management Pros →

Cons
"Our primary concern is third-party application visibility. Many people choose other DLP tools, as they can search the Office 365 suite and detect sensitive information across thousands of other apps. The product is weak compared to the competitors on the DLP front, but the classification is good; the tool needs a bit more maturation.""There is potential for more integration in the use of AI.""Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time.""There is room for improvement with the policy tips feature.""Microsoft can improve the affordability of Purview Information Protection by offering it at a lower cost."

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Cons →

"With SAS Data Management, you have to purchase an external driver, configure all of the tables for all of the data that you will extract from Salesforce. It's not a straightforward process.""Very little needs to improve but perhaps a nicer graphic interface and remaining competetive in the growing field of data analytics.""I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations.""We find we often have to go back and re-train users when there are changes made to the solution because the changes are not intuitive.""The solution is quite expensive and hard to install/configure.""The solution could use better documentation.""One problem is accessing the data using a solution other than SAS. The SAS data, which we create in the SAS, cannot be accessed by other tools. We can't open those data in other applications. So we need to have that application in place.""The pricing of the solution needs to be improved. They need to work to make it more affordable."

More SAS Data Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is affordable, and our clients agree. Sensitivity labels come with the MIP license at an additional $2 a month per user, an excellent deal for auto-labeling capabilities."
  • "The price is determined by the enterprise licensing, either the E3 or E5 licensing or the EMS plus security and other feature licensing."
  • More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "While it is even free for personal use on the cloud, it can be expensive for desktop installations and enterprise use."
  • "The tool is a bit expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More SAS Data Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It ensures that sensitive data is automatically safeguarded, even for email attachments, regardless of the user or device.
    Top Answer:The pricing and licensing for the product are quite expensive. Some advanced features are included in the E5 licensing, and it might be beneficial to see some of those features integrated into E3 to… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Purview Information Protection can improve in terms of scan concurrency and scan processing time. Currently, the default limit for scans is a bit restrictive, and reducing the time it takes… more »
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to include the ability to automate the modifications of the integrations.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    1,274
    Comparisons
    955
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    1,307
    Rating
    7.8
    28th
    out of 57 in Data Governance
    Views
    648
    Comparisons
    526
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    180
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Information Protection
    SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
    Learn More
    Overview

    Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.

    MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government8%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company10%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Governance
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance. Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Purview Information Protection is ranked 6th in Data Governance with 5 reviews while SAS Data Management is ranked 28th in Data Governance with 15 reviews. Microsoft Purview Information Protection is rated 7.8, while SAS Data Management is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Information Protection writes "Provides protection across multiple environments, can classify data and represent it graphically, and has the option for customer-managed teams to encrypt and manage data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Management writes "A scalable solution with customer support that is responsive and diligent". Microsoft Purview Information Protection is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Microsoft Defender XDR, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and BigID, whereas SAS Data Management is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Tungsten RPA, Microsoft Purview Data Governance, SSIS and IBM InfoSphere DataStage.

    See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

    We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.