Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ping Identity Platform vs SAS Data Management comparison

Ping Identity and SAS are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Ping Identity is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while SAS is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.5. Ping Identity holds a 0.3% mindshare in DG, compared to SAS’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAS users who would recommend it.
Ping Identity Platform
Read 29 Ping Identity Platform reviews
  • 121 Views
  • 49 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SAS Data Management
Read 17 SAS Data Management reviews
  • 408 Views
  • 197 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAS Data Management and Ping Identity Platform are strong competitors in the data management and identity management sectors, respectively. SAS Data Management appears more advantageous for data handling with its feature set, while Ping Identity Platform leads in identity management with its robust and flexible security protocols.

Features: SAS Data Management offers comprehensive data quality management, effective ETL capabilities, and flexible cross-functional data access. Ping Identity Platform provides strong multi-factor authentication, identity federation capabilities, and extensive security policy customization options.

Room for Improvement: SAS Data Management can improve in licensing flexibility, connectivity with cloud databases, and centralizing configuration processes. Ping Identity Platform can enhance its integration interfaces, simplify configuration processes, and improve support for internal and external authentications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS supports primarily on-premises deployments and offers reliable technical support, albeit with a complex installation process. Ping Identity Platform supports on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid cloud environments and is known for responsive customer service, though setup can require expertise.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is viewed as expensive but offers a high ROI through improved data accuracy and efficiency, particularly in compliance-focused industries. Ping Identity Platform's pricing is flexible and competitive within the IAM sector, providing high ROI in security, suited for those prioritizing identity management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. SAS Data Management Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. SAS Data Management
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Ping Identity Platform simplifies identity management, lowers IT overhead, enhances security, improves efficiency, boosts satisfaction, and offers scalability.
Sentiment score
6.5
SAS Data Management improves data accuracy and reliability, aiding cost efficiency and reporting, crucial in the pharmaceutical industry.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Ping Identity Platform's customer service is timely and knowledgeable, though occasionally slow for complex issues; self-help resources are commended.
Sentiment score
7.1
SAS Data Management customer service is generally reliable but mixed, with efficient technical support and room for improvement.
I have reached out to technical support for troubleshooting SAML certificate mismatches and federated errors between Ping and enterprise apps.
For more quotes and insights, download the Ping Identity Platform report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Ping Identity Platform offers adaptable scalability and performance, varying by configuration, environment, and server setup for different user needs.
Sentiment score
7.3
SAS Data Management is scalable, supporting enterprises globally with adaptable performance, seamless integration, and efficient complex data handling.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Ping Identity Platform is stable and reliable, with minor integration challenges and manageable issues, rated 8-10 for stability.
Sentiment score
7.6
SAS Data Management is reliable and efficient, with server stability on Linux, but Windows client may require restarts.
 

Room For Improvement

Ping Identity Platform needs enhanced authentication, integration, and user interface improvements for better security and user adoption.
SAS Data Management requires improved cost efficiency, flexibility, user interface, cloud capabilities, integration, accessibility, and training resources.
I would like to enable ServiceNow Generative AI for auto-diagnosing PingFederate SSO failures and suggest remediation steps.
For more quotes and insights, download the Ping Identity Platform report
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Setup Cost

Ping Identity Platform offers flexible annual pricing, appealing for large enterprises, valued for security and efficiency over competitors.
SAS Data Management is expensive but provides high value, with more affordable solutions integrating multiple functions for data management.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Ping Identity Platform report
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Valuable Features

Ping Identity Platform offers robust security with multi-factor authentication, seamless integrations, and customizable single sign-on for enhanced connectivity.
SAS Data Management provides seamless integration, quality, and governance with a user-friendly interface and robust transformation capabilities.
The platform enhances security measures by analyzing multi-factor authentication attempts, highlighting suspicious patterns, and generating compliance reports.
For more quotes and insights, download the Ping Identity Platform report
SAS Data Management stands out because of its data standardization, transformation, and verification capabilities.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAS Data Management report
 

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), Directory Servers (1st)
SAS Data Management
Ranking in Data Governance
28th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (36th), Data Quality (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Management is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
 

Featured Reviews

MAHESHKUMAR7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers multi-factor authentication and application support side of PingFederate but application only supports specific protocols
A lot of teams work with technical support, but I work with it for user issues only. You might need support with things like application swaps, application names, and application URLs. I didn't know where to find those in Ping Identity, so I contacted technical support for those issues. The support team is very clever and active. They provide end-to-end support once an issue is created. I have worked with most of the support team. I also work with the support team because I work with the operations team. I provide 24/7 support to production and non-production environments. I coordinate with application and network teams to troubleshoot critical tickets and issues related to Ping Identity solutions.
Read full review
Vivek Trivedi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has robust data governance capabilities and efficient financial alerting features
The platform's robust data governance capabilities ensure strong compliance with regulatory standards. Our dedicated data governance team is responsible for setting policies and monitoring data access and usage. Additionally, we have a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and an independent InfoSec team that work together to enforce these policies. This multi-layered approach ensures that data governance is effectively managed and compliant with all necessary regulations. It is integrated with SQL and Power BI servers for executive management dashboard reporting. This integration supports comprehensive data analysis and reporting needs, which was a key factor in our decision. The value of using vCenter lies in its comprehensive data infrastructure management. It significantly enhances our reporting, day-to-day decision-making, and analytics capabilities. Integrating SaaS with vCenter adds value by streamlining key functions and improving overall organizational efficiency. The solution can be considered expensive, particularly due to infrastructure, maintenance, and ownership costs. The long-term savings and efficiencies gained from using vCenter can justify the investment for large organizations. However, the high costs might not be justifiable for smaller organizations with less data and fewer resources. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis based on the organization's specific needs and scale is recommended. I rate it an eight.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
9%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingID?
The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?
The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PingID?
The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.
See all answers
What do you like most about SAS Data Management?
I am impressed with the tool's ability to customize.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAS Data Management?
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAS Data Management?
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 19% of the time
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Symantec Siteminder vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 7% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
More Ping Identity Platform Competitors
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAS Data Management
Compared 20% of the time
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management Logo
Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Management
Compared 15% of the time
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management Logo
Collibra Governance vs SAS Data Management
Compared 13% of the time
Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management Logo
Informatica PowerCenter vs SAS Data Management
Compared 12% of the time
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SAS Data Management Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SAS Data Management
Compared 10% of the time
More SAS Data Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform
June 2025
Ping Identity Platform reportDownload Ping Identity Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
SAS Data Management
May 2025
SAS Data Management reportDownload SAS Data Management product report
 

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
SAS Data Management Platform, Data Management Platform, DataFlux
 

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
Ping Identity

Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.

SAS
 

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Data Management, 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Absa, Aegon, Allianz Global Corporate & SpecialtyAusgrid, Bank of Queensland, Bell, BMC Software, Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Enerjisa, ERGO Insurance Group, Florida Department of Corrections, Generali Hellas, Gitanjali Group, Gloucestershire Constabulary, GS Home Shopping, HealthPartners, IAG New Zealand, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Orlando Magic, OTP Group, PITT OHIO, Plano Independent School District, RWE Poland, Spanish Air Force, Stockholm County Council, Telus, The Travel Corporation, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau, US Department of Housing and Urban Development, USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. SAS Data Management
June 2025
Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. SAS Data Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. SAS Data Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ping Identity Platform vs. SAS Data Management report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.