Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM InfoSphere Information Server Logo

IBM InfoSphere Information Server Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.1 out of 5

What is IBM InfoSphere Information Server?

Featured IBM InfoSphere Information Server reviews

IBM InfoSphere Information Server mindshare

Product category:
As of March 2026, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Server in the Data Integration category stands at 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM InfoSphere Information Server0.9%
SSIS3.6%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.6%
Other91.9%
Data Integration
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 8, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise90
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
14%
Retailer
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Insurance Company
4%
University
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Import And Exporter
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
 
IBM InfoSphere Information Server Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Data Engineer at Mohammed Mansour Alrumiah4.0I've used IBM InfoSphere Information Server for over 12 years mainly for ETL; it's stable and capable, but cloud scalability, documentation, and community support need improvement, and better customer relationship management would enhance its overall value.
Technical Data Analyst at Swedish Armed Forces4.0I've used IBM InfoSphere Information Server for seven to eight years; setup was easy, but development feels cloud-focused. Metadata management lacked value for us, and while support is decent, we mainly see bug fixes, not new features.
Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking primarily for its valuable DataStage administration feature, which aids in upgrades. However, the solution lacks sufficient private cloud support, prompting exploration of alternatives like IBM Cloud Data Lake and Snowflake Data Cloud.
Business Analyst Team Lead at Accenture3.5I have used IBM InfoSphere Information Server for five years as an integration tool. It's stable, and support is prompt, but I find it needs improved scalability and configuration options, leading to my 7/10 rating.
Developer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I find its integration with various technologies invaluable. While its stability is good, technical support needs improvement. I rate it a 7/10, as it's reliable but less user-friendly than alternatives.
Data Analytics Architect at Covenant Technology Partners LLC4.5We use this solution for enterprise data integration, valuing its Parallel Extender and scalability. It drastically reduced our ETL time. While excellent, we desire a server version and a more lightweight engine.
Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees4.5I've used this solution for seven years, appreciating its data connections, flexibility, and performance. However, I found customer service poor and technical support fair, noting room for improvement in reporting and training.
Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees5.0I value its features, reducing ETL time, and excellent support. I've encountered issues with index handling, scratch disk use, and job locks, but note no scalability problems.