SAS Data Management and Microsoft Purview are prominent contenders in the data management software sphere. SAS excels in ETL processes, offering robust data integration capabilities, while Microsoft Purview stands out in data governance, particularly with its seamless integration into Azure and advanced compliance features, making it superior for comprehensive data governance tasks.
Features: SAS Data Management is renowned for its robust ETL processes, data integration, and monitoring capabilities. It provides users with flexibility and easy access to data across different environments. Microsoft Purview is highly valued for its advanced data governance capabilities, seamless integration with Azure, and robust data classification and protection features.
Room for Improvement: SAS could enhance its database connectivity, simplify the licensing model, and improve the user interface and analytics tools. Microsoft Purview may benefit from better integration with non-Microsoft products, improved management of business glossary terms, and enhancements in real-time data ingestion.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS offers strong technical support, though with some gaps in documentation responsiveness, making deployment challenging, especially in on-premises scenarios. Microsoft Purview supports deployment across various cloud environments efficiently and receives positive feedback for its customer service, despite suggestions for better technical guidance.
Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Management is considered expensive, appealing mainly to larger enterprises, but offers a significant ROI in sectors like pharmaceuticals. Microsoft Purview provides a competitive, flexible pricing model often included in Microsoft 365 packages, praised for its cost-effectiveness aligned with modern cloud pricing strategies.
Clients benefit from using a one-stop-shop solution, increasing their visibility across different platforms.
Overall, it doesn't meet our expectations.
They're skillful people who know what they're doing in their space.
I have a dedicated team as a government agency, and Microsoft assists us promptly.
The support for SAS in Brazil is not the best one, but the support in Sweden is really good, as they visit the company and work to solve the issues.
With automation, you can label five documents or 50,000 with the same amount of clicks.
It allows for one-to-one connections with different types of servers, either cloud-based like AWS, or physical servers.
The product is scalable and works across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments.
It can take seven days to 24 hours to determine whether a policy is effective.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is absolutely fine in terms of stability.
It's essential to know if a feature isn't working due to missing licenses.
There are some problems with DLP rules, and it would be great if the security around DLP could be expanded.
A watermark feature or similar tools to help enhance security for end users could be added.
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs.
I'm not exactly sure how much our license costs, but it is very expensive.
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
It provides a comprehensive view of the entire ecosystem's threats and compliance in real time.
The sensitivity labeling is the most valuable feature because it is the foundation for automating the encryption process and ensuring proper data handling across the organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Governance has helped my company by finding insider risks, ensuring data loss prevention, and achieving compliance to make sure everybody is compliant.
SAS Data Management stands out because of its data standardization, transformation, and verification capabilities.
The best features I appreciate about SAS Data Management tool are that it's easy to create the flows and schedule data, and the tables are not too big, making it easy to control the ETL process, including user access which is also easy to manage in SAS.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Governance | 16.6% |
| SAS Data Management | 1.4% |
| Other | 82.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.
Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
