SAS Data Management and TIBCO BusinessWorks are prominent competitors in data management and integration software. While SAS has an edge with comprehensive data management solutions and non-technical user support, TIBCO stands out in real-time data processing and integration capabilities.
Features: SAS Data Management offers features like data quality, data integration, and ease of use for non-technical users. It includes cross-functional data handling and MDM for a unified data view. TIBCO BusinessWorks provides robust real-time data processing, high integration capabilities, and a low-code platform for ease in connecting legacy systems and cloud environments.
Room for Improvement: SAS faces high costs, complex licensing models, and challenges with non-ETL use cases. Connectivity and interface accessibility need enhancement. TIBCO encounters pricing issues, difficulties with cloud adaptation, and scalability challenges. Simplified cloud deployment and improved integration tools are necessary.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions are primarily on-premise, with TIBCO offering hybrid and cloud options. SAS's customer service requires improvement post-acquisition, with noted room for enhanced technical support. TIBCO provides stable support but has mixed feedback regarding ease of use and service extent.
Pricing and ROI: SAS is expensive, offering robust ROI mainly for larger enterprises in sectors like pharmaceuticals. TIBCO also has a costly pricing structure, favoring large enterprises with good ROI from reliability and accuracy improvements. Both products are criticized for high costs and complex licensing, though they deliver significant ROI in optimized data management.
The support for SAS in Brazil is not the best one, but the support in Sweden is really good, as they visit the company and work to solve the issues.
The technical support from TIBCO BusinessWorks is very good.
Customer service is very helpful.
It is not like AWS where I can add memory or more servers.
It is stable, however, every now and then, it just ends.
There is significant room for improvement, especially with regard to using a hybrid approach that involves both CAS and persistent storage.
The learning curve takes time compared to webMethods.
They should ensure that what was working in the previous version must also work in the new version of BW six.
Performance and latency could be enhanced.
From my experience, SAS Data Management is an expensive tool.
The current licensing cost for the product involves our resource sourcing team for negotiations.
Pricing is for an enterprise application, so the company pays for it with a company license.
The best features I appreciate about SAS Data Management tool are that it's easy to create the flows and schedule data, and the tables are not too big, making it easy to control the ETL process, including user access which is also easy to manage in SAS.
SAS Data Management stands out because of its data standardization, transformation, and verification capabilities.
When I have an architecture designed to plug in the service itself with BW, it makes things much easier.
It's a great software application for the middleware use cases to connect the front channels to the back ends in a secure and safer way.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
TIBCO BusinessWorks | 1.0% |
SAS Data Management | 0.9% |
Other | 98.1% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Large Enterprise | 8 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 23 |
Every decision, every business move, every successful customer interaction - they all come down to high-quality, well-integrated data. If you don't have it, you don't win. SAS Data Management is an industry-leading solution built on a data quality platform that helps you improve, integrate and govern your data.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.