Top 10 Portnox Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

22 reviews
93% willing to recommend

Top Portnox Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Portnox based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Aruba ClearPass, and Fortinet FortiNAC. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Portnox surpasses its competitors by offering real-time network visibility, seamless cloud deployment, and advanced security management, ensuring robust endpoint security and compliance. Its intuitive interface and efficient threat response provide unmatched protection for enterprise environments.

Portnox Security Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Portnox Security, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)

4.1 out of 5

Portnox offers flexible deployment and strong integration, appealing to those seeking easy setup and affordability. In comparison, Cisco ISE excels with robust security features and policy enforcement, attracting businesses needing extensive security controls despite higher initial costs.

Download Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs. Portnox Report

Pricing

Portnox has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), which may be a consideration for budget-conscious organizations. Cisco ISE offers a robust feature set that could justify its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Aruba ClearPass

4.3 out of 5

Aruba ClearPass

4.3 out of 5

Portnox focuses on simplicity with cloud management and pricing advantages. In comparison, Aruba ClearPass excels in policy management and robust security. Portnox's ease and support suit smaller teams, whereas Aruba ClearPass invites organizations needing high configurability and comprehensive features.

Download Aruba ClearPass vs. Portnox Report

Pricing

Portnox generally offers a more straightforward setup process with fewer upfront costs, while Aruba ClearPass tends to have higher initial expenses due to its more complex configuration and extensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiNAC

3.8 out of 5

Fortinet FortiNAC

3.8 out of 5

Portnox attracts attention with its cloud-native solutions and competitive pricing. In comparison, Fortinet FortiNAC impresses with extensive features and integration capabilities for complex environments, although its sophisticated deployment may require more resources, appealing to enterprises needing advanced network control.

Download Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Portnox Report

Pricing

Portnox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs compared to Fortinet FortiNAC, which involves a more complex setup process and higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Portnox offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs compared to Fortinet FortiNAC, which involves a more complex setup process and higher setup expenses.

Forescout Platform

4.2 out of 5

Forescout Platform

4.2 out of 5

Portnox offers competitive pricing and straightforward cloud-based deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers prioritizing customer service. In comparison, Forescout's comprehensive feature set and advanced device visibility attract tech buyers seeking extensive functionality over initial cost-efficiency.

Download Forescout Platform vs. Portnox Report

Pricing

Portnox offers a lower setup cost, while Forescout Platform tends to have a higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Portnox offers a lower setup cost, while Forescout Platform tends to have a higher initial expense.

Ruckus Cloudpath

3.7 out of 5

Ruckus Cloudpath

3.7 out of 5

Portnox offers a cost-effective, agentless approach with comprehensive endpoint visibility, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath's robust onboarding and authentication features, along with broad interoperability, make it ideal for complex IT environments seeking long-term value and advanced functionality.

Download Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report

Pricing

Portnox provides a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Ruckus Cloudpath has higher setup expenses that may affect budgeting decisions.

View comparison

Pricing

Portnox provides a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Ruckus Cloudpath has higher setup expenses that may affect budgeting decisions.

Sophos Network Access Control

4.2 out of 5

Sophos Network Access Control

4.2 out of 5

Portnox offers a cloud-native solution with easy deployment and lower costs appealing to businesses seeking scalability. In comparison, Sophos addresses advanced threat management needs with robust features, justifying its higher investment for organizations prioritizing comprehensive security integration.

Download Portnox vs. Sophos Network Access Control Report

Pricing

Portnox has a lower setup cost compared to Sophos Network Access Control, which makes it a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Portnox has a lower setup cost compared to Sophos Network Access Control, which makes it a more budget-friendly option.

Keytos

1 out of 5

Keytos

1 out of 5

Portnox offers network security with endpoint visibility and risk assessment. In comparison, Keytos specializes in identity verification with single sign-on. Portnox ensures a simple setup and scalable pricing, whereas Keytos appeals with swift deployment and premium identity security, catering to different tech buyer priorities.

Pricing

Portnox features a straightforward setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious organizations, while Keytos includes a higher initial investment that caters to enterprises requiring enhanced security features.

View comparison

Pricing

SecureW2

1 out of 5

SecureW2

1 out of 5

Portnox offers easy deployment with strong access control, ideal for quick network security setups. In comparison, SecureW2 provides comprehensive authentication features, making it preferable for organizations prioritizing advanced security integration despite a more complex setup process.

Pricing

Portnox requires a minimal setup cost making it budget-friendly, whereas SecureW2 entails a higher setup expense which supports its more advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Portnox requires a minimal setup cost making it budget-friendly, whereas SecureW2 entails a higher setup expense which supports its more advanced features.

Related categories

Network Access Control (NAC)

Passwordless Authentication

ZTNA