Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtremeControl vs Portnox comparison

Extreme and Portnox Security are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Extreme is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7, while Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Extreme holds a 1.8% mindshare in NAC, compared to Portnox Security’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Extreme users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.
ExtremeControl
Read 8 ExtremeControl reviews
  • 779 Views
  • 573 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Portnox
Read 22 Portnox reviews
  • 1,565 Views
  • 875 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Portnox and ExtremeControl are competing network access control solutions. Portnox appears to have an edge in pricing and support, whereas ExtremeControl is favored for its advanced feature set.

Features: Portnox offers cloud-native NAC, remote accessibility, and real-time network visibility with intuitive management. ExtremeControl provides enriched network insights, robust policy enforcement, and extensive third-party integrations, making it ideal for complex networks.

Room for Improvement: Portnox could benefit from enhanced configuration flexibility, improved integrations with legacy systems, and expanded reporting capabilities. ExtremeControl may improve by simplifying deployment, reducing setup complexity, and enhancing its user interface for a more intuitive experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is noted for its simple cloud-based setup and proactive support. ExtremeControl provides strong deployment protocols but requires a longer setup time due to its comprehensive controls while offering detailed guidance and commendable support.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox's subscription model is cost-effective and scalable, aligning with budget-focused enterprises. ExtremeControl, with higher initial costs, offers substantial ROI for environments demanding detailed access controls, providing value through optimized security of complex networks.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeControl vs. Portnox Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ExtremeControl vs. Portnox
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
ExtremeControl's ROI opinions varied, with mixed views on financial returns, Wi-Fi connectivity, security benefits, and cost concerns.
Sentiment score
7.3
Portnox CORE improved network visibility, security, and efficiency, reducing costs and enhancing decision-making through detailed analytics and automated features.
Having good connectivity through Wi-Fi is essential for the entire business.
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
If you were moving from a traditional on-premise NAC that was 100% managed by the IT department, there would be great savings in going to a cloud-based NAC with Portnox.
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
ExtremeControl's support is praised for problem-solving but criticized for upgrade policies, varying satisfaction levels among users.
Sentiment score
7.3
Portnox customer service is highly rated for responsiveness and efficiency, with room for improvement in local services and communication.
If we are out of upgrades or there is a new upgrade, they sometimes require us to upgrade to provide support.
For technical support of ExtremeControl, I have no doubts that they cope with problems effectively.
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
They resolved issues quickly and provided clear explanations.
They respond very immediately and provide detailed, amazing support.
I was seeing weird things, and they were able to explain things to me and help me quickly find a resolution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
reviewer2679522 - PeerSpot reviewer
JZ
Scott Kerr - PeerSpot reviewer
MP
Jim Marx - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Opinions on ExtremeControl's scalability vary, with some praising its capacity while others find it limited across platforms.
Sentiment score
7.5
Portnox is scalable and flexible, supporting growth efficiently, though larger setups may require more resources, rated seven to ten.
For scalability in larger environments, it can be rated a maximum of 10.
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
ExtremeControl is highly stable, with users consistently rating it 8-9/10, indicating reliable performance meeting expectations.
Sentiment score
7.6
Portnox offers reliable uptime, though CORE users report issues with vendor support and configuration, while Clear performs smoothly.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
The product itself is available and its uptime is 100%.
In the four years that I used Portnox, if it crashed or the server crashed, that would not have been more than once.
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
 

Room For Improvement

ExtremeControl requires better user control, third-party integration, on-premise enhancements, and clarity on wireless component configuration for optimal performance.
Portnox can improve with better GUI, integration, scalability, support, licensing, false positives, documentation, and Wi-Fi and AI analytics.
We rely more on the cloud for analytics rather than on-premise, and some customers prefer relying on an on-premise solution rather than a cloud solution.
There is also another product called UZTNA, which is said to have NAC in this solution, but it is not as advanced as our regular ExtremeControl.
For their wired network, especially with third-party switching, this is where most of the features are lost.
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.
They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours.
When I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly.
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
WA
JZ
reviewer2679522 - PeerSpot reviewerScott Kerr - PeerSpot reviewer
GM
MP
 

Setup Cost

ExtremeControl offers competitive pricing for large enterprises, but may be costly for smaller ones due to minimum user requirements.
Portnox offers scalable, competitive pricing based on ports, with annual fees, appreciated value, but no perpetual license option.
Compared to other competitors, they have the best pricing.
The pricing of ExtremeControl is considerable; I would rate it at eight or nine.
For smaller ones, they need to consider that the price for less than 1,000 users is important, as this is the minimum number of users required for a license.
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe.
If you compare Portnox with all other well-known standard products, it is the cheapest.
It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
reviewer2679522 - PeerSpot reviewer
WA
JZ
Scott Kerr - PeerSpot reviewer
GM
Jim Marx - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

ExtremeControl provides robust security, seamless integration, and easy use with flexible policies and comprehensive network monitoring.
Portnox provides scalable, agentless network visibility with intuitive dashboards and automated security integration, enhancing efficiency and endpoint compliance.
The biggest benefits for my customers from ExtremeControl include the ability to integrate third-party devices, integration with user databases like Microsoft Active Directory or other directory software, and it is easy to maintain by customers.
The most effective feature of ExtremeControl is that whenever any user is connected through the network, I can really dig down and check exactly what applications they have been using.
Integrating ExtremeControl with ExtremeConnect provides an additional layer of security and control over what devices are onboarding to the network, granting full visibility.
For more quotes and insights, download the ExtremeControl report
It's notable how Portnox has improved operational efficiency.
It provides very granular details of the device connected to each port.
We use Meraki for our switching, making it simple to point all our networks and offices to Portnox.
For more quotes and insights, download the Portnox report
JZ
reviewer2679522 - PeerSpot reviewer
WA
GM
RE
Scott Kerr - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtremeControl
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Portnox
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
ZTNA (11th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of ExtremeControl is 1.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 3.7%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
 

Featured Reviews

Jose Mota - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a simple setup process, but it could be affordable
We have noticed similarities between Extreme and Ubiquiti, particularly in their functionality, like how they operate wirelessly and can be managed from the cloud or locally. Based on our experience, Ubiquiti's system may be more user-friendly and capable of handling heavy loads. Still, Extreme could be more reliable, although you have yet to compare them side by side directly. For instance, we have observed Extreme performing well in a warehouse environment, which might have a different level of network traffic than a convention center.
Read full review
Scott Kerr - PeerSpot reviewer
It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup
We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
10%
Government
9%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtremeControl?
It has effectively enhanced network security and integrated with other security tools to streamline operations.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ExtremeControl?
Regarding improvements for ExtremeControl, I think it is good as it is; however, some other products can support features like certificate management, which ExtremeControl currently lacks. Adding c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ExtremeControl?
The main use cases for ExtremeControl among my customers are to authenticate the users here for the end systems in their companies and to manage authentication, authorization, and systems, and they...
See all answers
What do you like most about Portnox CORE?
It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?
It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?
We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs ExtremeControl Logo
Aruba ClearPass vs ExtremeControl
Compared 44% of the time
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeControl Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs ExtremeControl
Compared 34% of the time
Fortinet FortiNAC vs ExtremeControl Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC vs ExtremeControl
Compared 15% of the time
Forescout Platform vs ExtremeControl Logo
Forescout Platform vs ExtremeControl
Compared 8% of the time
More ExtremeControl Competitors
Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox Logo
Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox
Compared 27% of the time
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox Logo
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox
Compared 27% of the time
Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox Logo
Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox
Compared 16% of the time
Forescout Platform vs Portnox Logo
Forescout Platform vs Portnox
Compared 16% of the time
SecureW2 vs Portnox Logo
SecureW2 vs Portnox
Compared 7% of the time
More Portnox Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Access Control (NAC)
June 2025
ExtremeControl reportDownload ExtremeControl product report
Buyer's Guide
Portnox
June 2025
Portnox reportDownload Portnox product report
 

Also Known As

Extreme Access Control, Enterasys NAC
Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Extreme
Portnox Security
 

Overview

ExtremeControl lets you manage secure and automated access for both, BYOD and IoT devices from one convenient dashboard. It makes it easy to roll out granular policies across your wired and wireless networks to meet industry and company compliance obligations. Identity based network access control keeps unauthorized people and devices from accessing your network.
Extreme

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

  • Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
  • Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
  • Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
  • Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
  • Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

  • Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
  • Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
  • Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
  • Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
  • Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security
 

Sample Customers

Street Crane, Robert Bosch, Molex Chengdu, Weir Valves & Controls UK, Renault, AESSEAL, Ducati, Alexander Dennis, UK Ministry of Defence, Manz
Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines, 
Buyer's Guide
ExtremeControl vs. Portnox
June 2025
Free Report: ExtremeControl vs. Portnox
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeControl vs. Portnox and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtremeControl vs. Portnox report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.