Portnox and ExtremeControl compete in the network access control solutions category. Portnox has the advantage in pricing and support effectiveness, while ExtremeControl leads with its advanced feature offerings, suggesting Portnox is more cost-effective whereas ExtremeControl offers more comprehensive capabilities.
Features:Portnox offers simplified cloud-based deployment with easy management, integration in heterogeneous environments, and solid network control. ExtremeControl provides extensive network integration, advanced visibility, and third-party device support.
Room for Improvement:Portnox could benefit from further enhancing its user interface and integration capabilities. Some users might seek more advanced reporting features and lower deployment complexities. ExtremeControl needs improvements in deployment simplicity, reducing initial setup costs, and enhancing user interface customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Portnox offers straightforward deployment with robust support, easing implementation. In contrast, ExtremeControl's complicated setup due to advanced features is balanced by its detailed and responsive support.
Pricing and ROI:Portnox provides competitive pricing, ideal for small to medium businesses seeking cost-effective solutions. ExtremeControl's potentially higher setup costs are offset by its substantial ROI due to its robust feature set, which may suit organizations valuing functionality over initial expense.
Having good connectivity through Wi-Fi is essential for the entire business.
If you were moving from a traditional on-premise NAC that was 100% managed by the IT department, there would be great savings in going to a cloud-based NAC with Portnox.
If we are out of upgrades or there is a new upgrade, they sometimes require us to upgrade to provide support.
For technical support of ExtremeControl, I have no doubts that they cope with problems effectively.
The main area needing improvement is the technical knowledge of support staff.
They respond very immediately and provide detailed, amazing support.
I was seeing weird things, and they were able to explain things to me and help me quickly find a resolution.
For scalability in larger environments, it can be rated a maximum of 10.
The product itself is available and its uptime is 100%.
In the four years that I used Portnox, if it crashed or the server crashed, that would not have been more than once.
If there is a version one and another version, the communication between the organization using it and Portnox should be firm so they can coordinate effectively.
We rely more on the cloud for analytics rather than on-premise, and some customers prefer relying on an on-premise solution rather than a cloud solution.
For their wired network, especially with third-party switching, this is where most of the features are lost.
There is also another product called UZTNA, which is said to have NAC in this solution, but it is not as advanced as our regular ExtremeControl.
Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.
When I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly.
They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours.
Compared to other competitors, they have the best pricing.
The pricing of ExtremeControl is considerable; I would rate it at eight or nine.
For smaller ones, they need to consider that the price for less than 1,000 users is important, as this is the minimum number of users required for a license.
If you compare Portnox with all other well-known standard products, it is the cheapest.
The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe.
You are charged according to the number of users.
The biggest benefits for my customers from ExtremeControl include the ability to integrate third-party devices, integration with user databases like Microsoft Active Directory or other directory software, and it is easy to maintain by customers.
Integrating ExtremeControl with ExtremeConnect provides an additional layer of security and control over what devices are onboarding to the network, granting full visibility.
The most effective feature of ExtremeControl is that whenever any user is connected through the network, I can really dig down and check exactly what applications they have been using.
It's notable how Portnox has improved operational efficiency.
It is a very robust application because three teams use that part: the network team, the security team, and the support people.
It is very easy to implement on our current network hardware.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Portnox | 4.7% |
ExtremeControl | 2.1% |
Other | 93.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 3 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 3 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 12 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 7 |
Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.
Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.
What are the essential features of Portnox?
What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?
Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.