Portnox vs macmon Network Access Control comparison

macmon secure and Portnox Security are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. macmon secure is ranked #13, while Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7. macmon secure holds a 2.9% mindshare in NAC, compared to Portnox Security’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of macmon secure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

macmon Network Access Control

Read 3 macmon Network Access Control reviews

1,247 Views
1,247 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 24 Portnox reviews

2,070 Views
1,697 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

macmon Network Access Control

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Portnox and macmon Network Access Control compete in the Network Access Control domain. Users lean towards Portnox for better pricing and customer support, while macmon attracts users with its extensive features that align with its pricing.

Features: Portnox offers cloud-native solutions with full device visibility and control across various systems without on-premise hardware needs. macmon Network Access Control provides comprehensive security, dynamic segmentation, and VLAN management tailored for intricate networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: macmon Network Access Control offers a simple deployment process with strong setup support. Portnox provides versatile deployment options including cloud and on-premise, suitable for different organization sizes but may need additional initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox features a scalable pricing model, minimizing infrastructure costs through its cloud-based approach, ensuring cost-effectiveness. macmon Network Access Control requires more initial investment, but the advanced features deliver satisfactory ROI for entities seeking enhanced security.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

macmon Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (12th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of macmon Network Access Control is 2.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 5.2%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Portnox	5.2%
macmon Network Access Control	2.9%
Other	91.9%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Yusuf Oezeren

Senior System Engineer at MOD IT GmbH

A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network

The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly. The interface is user-friendly but, for example, when we have new people starting to work, they never work with NetOne and it is a bit hard to expand in certain places. In addition, when I have to pull the last corrected MAC address, I need to put the space between it in order to find the address. If I don't put it in there, I don't get any resources. This needs improvement. They should maybe add integration with LanSuite. We can include it to see the direct information we get from our LAN Tree. If I click on the MAC address, I will then directly get the hostname, and that will open a tap-in line so I see what the last update was.

Read full review

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."

"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."

"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."

"The cloud-based feature is very nice. We use Meraki for our switching, and it is simple to point all of our networks and offices to Portnox. It is pretty seamless."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

"Portnox ensures system compliance through policy enforcement, including antivirus updates, Windows operating system updates, and system patches, helping network administrators maintain system health and security across the network."

"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."

"With Portnox, you have a large-scale view of the systems on your estate, and you can use the ID of that user to search and get substantial information about a user."

"The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away."

"The technical support is top-notch."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."

"The service macmon offers is already great."

"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."

"Allowing for a search of MAC addresses in the interface, whether they are authenticated on the network or not, would be beneficial. Currently, it only finds authenticated MAC addresses, which complicates troubleshooting when the same MAC address is used for different requests."

"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."

"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."

"It would be good to integrate Portnox CORE with CLEAR."

"We have seen instances where the older version stops working properly, and we have to update each system individually."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 42% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 23% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 19% of the time

Forescout Platform vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 7% of the time

More macmon Network Access Control Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 19% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 15% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

macmon Network Access Control

December 2025

Download macmon Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

December 2025

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

macmon NAC

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

macmon secure

Portnox Security

Overview

With macmon Network Access Control you always know which devices are connected to your network and where. It provides profound protection for your corporate network and is a centralized security authority that protects your network against intrusion from unauthorized devices, and ensures the complete overview of all your devices.

UFOs (unknown frightening objects) are a thing of the past, as all your devices such as PCs, printers, laptops, medical and technical devices are identified at any time, efficiently monitored and protected against unauthorized access. Guest and employee devices (BYOD) can be easily and securely authorized via the macmon guest service using dynamic management of network segmentation.

To protect your network against unauthorized access, macmon provides two efficient product bundles as well as additional Add-Ons.

Find out more:
- macmon NAC Bundles
- macmon NAC features

macmon secure

Portnox provides advanced network visibility and proactive security without complexity, ensuring easy setup and scalability. Its agentless nature and intuitive design enable seamless device management and system integration, promoting efficient network operations and endpoint security.

Portnox is known for offering comprehensive network access control, providing firms with vital tools for managing authentication and securing endpoint devices. It's praised for ease of use in integrating with systems such as RADIUS servers and offering detailed analytical capabilities to ensure compliance and control unauthorized access. While users appreciate the intuitive interface and device management, improvements have been suggested in the areas of better GUI, integration with firewalls, and enhanced configuration methods. Portnox aids in handling dynamic VLAN assignments and securing access in both wired and wireless networks, proving particularly valuable for on-premises and remote environments.

What are the key features of Portnox?

Network Visibility: Offers comprehensive oversight of network activities.
Agentless Setup: Ensures easy implementation with minimal disruption.
Compliance Checks: Provides tools for compliance verification and incident reporting.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing IT systems for efficient management.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Prioritizes proactive measures to secure endpoints.
Easy Management: Facilitates straightforward device handling and network control.
Efficiency: Streamlines network operations for better performance.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth without complexities.

In industries where network security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Portnox is implemented to fortify access control and manage endpoint connections effectively. Its ability to secure both on-premises and remote environments makes it a versatile choice across sectors that require stringent access management, particularly where unauthorized device connections pose significant risks.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

More than 1,500 installations in all over Europe in all industries: Stepchange, Volkswagen, Vivantes Healthcare, MBDA Weapons, APS engineering, Alfred Ritter GmbH (Ritter Sport), Haßberg-Kliniken, 1. FSV Mainz 05 eV., Siempelkamp, AEB etc.

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

December 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.