Portnox vs macmon Network Access Control comparison

macmon secure and Portnox Security are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. macmon secure is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. macmon secure holds a 2.9% mindshare in NAC, compared to Portnox Security’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of macmon secure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

macmon Network Access Control

Read 3 macmon Network Access Control reviews

1,506 Views
1,506 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 22 Portnox reviews

1,775 Views
1,562 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

macmon Network Access Control

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Portnox and macmon Network Access Control are competing products in network access control solutions. Portnox has an advantage in pricing and support with a cost-effective and user-friendly approach, while macmon Network Access Control stands out in features, offering a comprehensive network security solution that justifies a higher investment.

Features: Portnox includes seamless integration capabilities, cloud-based management, and comprehensive network visibility, making it a flexible choice for dynamic environments. macmon Network Access Control offers advanced segmentation, automated security policies, and detailed reporting, enhancing network security management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox provides a streamlined cloud-based deployment model that minimizes setup time and simplifies scaling, supported by responsive customer service. macmon Network Access Control involves a more complex on-premise deployment, requiring more initial setup but offers hands-on support crucial for intricate environments.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers a competitive pricing model with predictable costs and impressive ROI for organizations prioritizing budget efficiency. macmon Network Access Control requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant ROI through its powerful security features, appealing to enterprises focused on long-term value and robust protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

macmon Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (11th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of macmon Network Access Control is 2.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 4.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Yusuf Oezeren

Senior System Engineer at MOD IT GmbH

A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network

The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly. The interface is user-friendly but, for example, when we have new people starting to work, they never work with NetOne and it is a bit hard to expand in certain places. In addition, when I have to pull the last corrected MAC address, I need to put the space between it in order to find the address. If I don't put it in there, I don't get any resources. This needs improvement. They should maybe add integration with LanSuite. We can include it to see the direct information we get from our LAN Tree. If I click on the MAC address, I will then directly get the hostname, and that will open a tap-in line so I see what the last update was.

Read full review

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."

"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."

"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."

"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."

"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."

"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."

"The technical support is top-notch."

"It's agentless, and it's scalable."

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."

"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."

"The service macmon offers is already great."

"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end. If there is an improvement, it should be around having more functions on the integration with the Wi-Fi controller I used, which was a UniFi controller, also on-prem."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

"The support team is very limited. They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours; the team sits in during the EMI and US hours."

"In terms of operational efficiency, things are more complicated now. It takes more time to get devices on the network, but we increased security quite a bit."

"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."

"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about macmon Network Access Control?

The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for macmon Network Access Control?

The solution is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with macmon Network Access Control?

There is no information on the protocol where the clients stop to authenticate. There are some policies, but I don't know whether the device stopped on the authentication or authorization levels. I...

See all answers

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 47% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 24% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 23% of the time

Forescout Platform vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 7% of the time

More macmon Network Access Control Competitors

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 25% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 25% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 14% of the time

Keytos vs Portnox

Compared 7% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

macmon Network Access Control

August 2025

Download macmon Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

August 2025

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

macmon NAC

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

macmon secure

Portnox Security

Overview

With macmon Network Access Control you always know which devices are connected to your network and where. It provides profound protection for your corporate network and is a centralized security authority that protects your network against intrusion from unauthorized devices, and ensures the complete overview of all your devices.

UFOs (unknown frightening objects) are a thing of the past, as all your devices such as PCs, printers, laptops, medical and technical devices are identified at any time, efficiently monitored and protected against unauthorized access. Guest and employee devices (BYOD) can be easily and securely authorized via the macmon guest service using dynamic management of network segmentation.

To protect your network against unauthorized access, macmon provides two efficient product bundles as well as additional Add-Ons.

Find out more:
- macmon NAC Bundles
- macmon NAC features

macmon secure

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

More than 1,500 installations in all over Europe in all industries: Stepchange, Volkswagen, Vivantes Healthcare, MBDA Weapons, APS engineering, Alfred Ritter GmbH (Ritter Sport), Haßberg-Kliniken, 1. FSV Mainz 05 eV., Siempelkamp, AEB etc.

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

July 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.