Portnox vs macmon Network Access Control comparison

macmon secure and Portnox Security are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. macmon secure is ranked #13, while Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7. macmon secure holds a 2.8% mindshare in NAC, compared to Portnox Security’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of macmon secure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

macmon Network Access Control

Read 3 macmon Network Access Control reviews

1,322 Views
1,322 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 24 Portnox reviews

1,848 Views
1,608 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

macmon Network Access Control

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Portnox and macmon Network Access Control are leading solutions in network security. Portnox is highlighted for its competitive pricing and robust support, while macmon Network Access Control takes the lead in feature set despite higher costs.

Features: Portnox focuses on remote access control, centralized management, and seamless cloud integration, targeting organizations that require flexibility and extensive oversight. macmon Network Access Control provides advanced network segmentation, device profiling, and real-time visibility, suitable for enterprises focusing on comprehensive security policies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox simplifies deployment through its cloud-first architecture, allowing rapid onboarding and configuration, appealing to businesses seeking minimal setup time. It also offers responsive customer service. macmon Network Access Control requires a more involved setup process due to on-premise options but provides detailed documentation and reliable support, assisting more complex implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox delivers competitive pricing focused on value, making it attractive to small to mid-sized enterprises with constrained budgets. It presents a favorable ROI. macmon Network Access Control, while pricier, offers substantial ROI in environments where comprehensive network protection is essential.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

macmon Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (12th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of macmon Network Access Control is 2.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 4.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Portnox	4.7%
macmon Network Access Control	2.8%
Other	92.5%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Yusuf Oezeren

Senior System Engineer at MOD IT GmbH

A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network

The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly. The interface is user-friendly but, for example, when we have new people starting to work, they never work with NetOne and it is a bit hard to expand in certain places. In addition, when I have to pull the last corrected MAC address, I need to put the space between it in order to find the address. If I don't put it in there, I don't get any resources. This needs improvement. They should maybe add integration with LanSuite. We can include it to see the direct information we get from our LAN Tree. If I click on the MAC address, I will then directly get the hostname, and that will open a tap-in line so I see what the last update was.

Read full review

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."

"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."

"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."

"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device."

"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."

"One of the features I enjoyed the most about Portnox was the ability to dive in with proper details on an endpoint."

"The technical support is top-notch."

"The minute people have issues on their network, we can see what is happening right away."

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"The service macmon offers is already great."

"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."

"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."

"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

"We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE."

"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."

"We have seen instances where the older version stops working properly, and we have to update each system individually."

"Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts."

"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

"The vendor price is fair."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 24% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 21% of the time

Forescout Platform vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 7% of the time

More macmon Network Access Control Competitors

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 25% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 24% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 14% of the time

Keytos vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

macmon Network Access Control

September 2025

Download macmon Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

September 2025

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

macmon NAC

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

macmon secure

Portnox Security

Overview

With macmon Network Access Control you always know which devices are connected to your network and where. It provides profound protection for your corporate network and is a centralized security authority that protects your network against intrusion from unauthorized devices, and ensures the complete overview of all your devices.

UFOs (unknown frightening objects) are a thing of the past, as all your devices such as PCs, printers, laptops, medical and technical devices are identified at any time, efficiently monitored and protected against unauthorized access. Guest and employee devices (BYOD) can be easily and securely authorized via the macmon guest service using dynamic management of network segmentation.

To protect your network against unauthorized access, macmon provides two efficient product bundles as well as additional Add-Ons.

Find out more:
- macmon NAC Bundles
- macmon NAC features

macmon secure

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

More than 1,500 installations in all over Europe in all industries: Stepchange, Volkswagen, Vivantes Healthcare, MBDA Weapons, APS engineering, Alfred Ritter GmbH (Ritter Sport), Haßberg-Kliniken, 1. FSV Mainz 05 eV., Siempelkamp, AEB etc.

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

September 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.