Portnox vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) comparison

Portnox Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Portnox Security is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #22. Portnox Security holds a 1.9% mindshare in Z, compared to Broadcom’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Portnox Security users are willing to recommend the solution.

Portnox

Read 24 Portnox reviews

2,070 Views
186 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Read 1 Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) review

613 Views
135 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Portnox

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Portnox and Symantec Zero Trust Network Access are competitive solutions in the cybersecurity domain, each with unique strengths. Portnox stands out for its affordability and ease of use, while Symantec ZTNA is recognized for its comprehensive security features.

Features: Portnox offers easy-to-integrate network access controls, real-time monitoring capabilities, and simple network management. Symantec ZTNA provides robust identity verification, cross-platform security measures, and advanced threat protection. Portnox focuses on delivering straightforward security solutions, whereas Symantec delivers a more extensive suite of tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is known for a quick setup and a user-friendly interface, which lowers adoption barriers. Symantec ZTNA requires more technical expertise for deployment but offers extensive customer support and detailed documentation. Portnox facilitates a seamless installation process, while Symantec provides thorough post-deployment service support.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox's competitive pricing and straightforward deployment contribute to a significant return on investment. Symantec ZTNA is more expensive but offers enhanced security features that justify the cost for many organizations. Portnox provides cost efficiency with dependable security outcomes, while Symantec presents a high-cost, high-value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in ZTNA

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (6th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Ranking in ZTNA

22nd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (24th), ZTNA as a Service (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Portnox is 1.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is 1.4%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Portnox	1.9%
Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)	1.4%
Other	96.7%

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

cto543714

CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Restricts access to applications but improvement is needed in integrations

Over the last year, I have been working with customers because it's changing and maturing. These things are rolled out in segments and chunks, not all at once. Additional internal work is often required to make it functional, such as properly configuring the active directory. This internal work can take up to three months. The process varies, and implementing Symantec ZTNA quickly is not realistic. I wouldn't recommend the tool to non-core customers because you won't get the support you need. I'd rate Symantec ZTNA a seven on a scale of one to ten. They're still integrating different pieces into their solution. The challenge with ZTNA is that different companies implement it slightly differently, with some features present in one product but missing in another. ZTNA is a tricky acronym that companies use, but when you look closely, you find that each vendor might only have some of the expected features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."

"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."

"Portnox helped to free up staff time and resources for other IT security priorities and IT work."

"Portnox ensures system compliance through policy enforcement, including antivirus updates, Windows operating system updates, and system patches, helping network administrators maintain system health and security across the network."

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

"One of the features I enjoyed the most about Portnox was the ability to dive in with proper details on an endpoint."

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

More Portnox pros

"The most valuable feature of this product is restricting and controlling what people have access to. If I want a contractor to connect to my network, I can give them access to only the specific things they need without giving them full VPN access to my entire network. That's the main benefit everyone gets from it. The value depends on how many users and applications you have and what you want to share."

Cons

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end. If there is an improvement, it should be around having more functions on the integration with the Wi-Fi controller I used, which was a UniFi controller, also on-prem."

"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end."

"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."

"It could be a little cheaper."

"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."

"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."

"The licensing is based on a per-port price, even when you are not using all of the ports, and this is something that could be improved."

More Portnox cons

"For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don't. For example, if you want to use two-factor authentication, you need to integrate that into the solution. Or if you want to accept protocols other than web coming to your secure gateway, that's another integration. Supporting different devices like Macs, Samsung phones, or iPhones also requires more integrations. Ensuring all these integrations work properly is an ongoing process and a moving target."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"The vendor price is fair."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

The solution helps to allow access only to what is explicitly needed. This means restricting access to specific applications rather than providing broad access to multiple resources, some of which ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 19% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 15% of the time

Tempered Airwall vs Portnox

Compared 2% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 15% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 14% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 11% of the time

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 7% of the time

More Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

December 2025

Download Portnox product report

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

December 2025

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) report

Download Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Symantec Secure Access Cloud, Luminate.io, Luminate

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

Portnox provides advanced network visibility and proactive security without complexity, ensuring easy setup and scalability. Its agentless nature and intuitive design enable seamless device management and system integration, promoting efficient network operations and endpoint security.

Portnox is known for offering comprehensive network access control, providing firms with vital tools for managing authentication and securing endpoint devices. It's praised for ease of use in integrating with systems such as RADIUS servers and offering detailed analytical capabilities to ensure compliance and control unauthorized access. While users appreciate the intuitive interface and device management, improvements have been suggested in the areas of better GUI, integration with firewalls, and enhanced configuration methods. Portnox aids in handling dynamic VLAN assignments and securing access in both wired and wireless networks, proving particularly valuable for on-premises and remote environments.

What are the key features of Portnox?

Network Visibility: Offers comprehensive oversight of network activities.
Agentless Setup: Ensures easy implementation with minimal disruption.
Compliance Checks: Provides tools for compliance verification and incident reporting.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing IT systems for efficient management.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Prioritizes proactive measures to secure endpoints.
Easy Management: Facilitates straightforward device handling and network control.
Efficiency: Streamlines network operations for better performance.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth without complexities.

In industries where network security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Portnox is implemented to fortify access control and manage endpoint connections effectively. Its ability to secure both on-premises and remote environments makes it a versatile choice across sectors that require stringent access management, particularly where unauthorized device connections pose significant risks.

Portnox Security

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), revolutionizes remote access security for enterprise applications. By replacing traditional VPNs with secure, temporary connections solely to required applications, it significantly reduces the attack surface, mitigating the risk of data breaches. Whether accessing cloud-based or on-premises applications, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) ensures robust security through continuous authentication and authorization, adhering to the Zero Trust principle of "never trust, always verify." This solution not only enhances security by reducing unauthorized access but also simplifies access for users while offering scalability and cost savings by eliminating the need for complex hardware and software. Tailored for organizations with remote workforces, cloud-based applications, and stringent data security concerns, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) stands as an efficient and scalable access control solution among its competitors.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

NEX, AIG, Fiverr, Upwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, Cloudflare and others in ZTNA. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.