Portnox vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) comparison

Portnox Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Portnox Security is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9, while Broadcom is ranked #26. Portnox Security holds a 0.7% mindshare in Z, compared to Broadcom’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Portnox Security users are willing to recommend the solution.

Portnox

Read 22 Portnox reviews

53 Views
8 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Read 1 Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) review

74 Views
11 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Portnox

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Portnox and Symantec Zero Trust Network Access are competing products in network security, leveraging zero-trust architectures. Symantec ZTNA is often considered superior due to its comprehensive features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Portnox provides a user-friendly experience with simplified network access control, seamless integration, and compliance management. Symantec ZTNA offers advanced threat protection, detailed policy enforcement, and granular control over user access. The main difference is Symantec's enhanced security capabilities, ideal for enterprises needing strict access protocols.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec ZTNA is notable for straightforward deployment, scalability, and strong customer service. Portnox offers an intuitive deployment process with robust support. Symantec’s infrastructure benefits enterprises seeking scalable solutions, whereas Portnox's model is praised for simplicity and ease of use.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox typically offers more attractive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations and providing solid ROI. Symantec ZTNA requires a higher initial investment but offers significant long-term value with its extensive feature set. Its higher setup cost is balanced by the ability to enhance enterprise trust frameworks, suited for organizations prioritizing advanced security measures.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 855,156 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in ZTNA

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (6th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Ranking in ZTNA

26th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (24th), ZTNA as a Service (23rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Portnox is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

cto543714

CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Restricts access to applications but improvement is needed in integrations

Over the last year, I have been working with customers because it's changing and maturing. These things are rolled out in segments and chunks, not all at once. Additional internal work is often required to make it functional, such as properly configuring the active directory. This internal work can take up to three months. The process varies, and implementing Symantec ZTNA quickly is not realistic. I wouldn't recommend the tool to non-core customers because you won't get the support you need. I'd rate Symantec ZTNA a seven on a scale of one to ten. They're still integrating different pieces into their solution. The challenge with ZTNA is that different companies implement it slightly differently, with some features present in one product but missing in another. ZTNA is a tricky acronym that companies use, but when you look closely, you find that each vendor might only have some of the expected features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

"Portnox helped to free up staff time and resources for other IT security priorities and IT work."

"It's agentless, and it's scalable."

"The Portnox dashboard is very easy to use, and the UI is simple."

"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."

"The most important feature is that this solution is agentless. So, you don't have to install any agents on endpoints."

"The technical support is top-notch."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

More Portnox pros

"The most valuable feature of this product is restricting and controlling what people have access to. If I want a contractor to connect to my network, I can give them access to only the specific things they need without giving them full VPN access to my entire network. That's the main benefit everyone gets from it. The value depends on how many users and applications you have and what you want to share."

Cons

"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."

"The support team is very limited. They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours; the team sits in during the EMI and US hours."

"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."

"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."

"Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end."

More Portnox cons

"For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don't. For example, if you want to use two-factor authentication, you need to integrate that into the solution. Or if you want to accept protocols other than web coming to your secure gateway, that's another integration. Supporting different devices like Macs, Samsung phones, or iPhones also requires more integrations. Ensuring all these integrations work properly is an ongoing process and a moving target."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"Pricing is quite reasonable."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

855,156 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

The solution helps to allow access only to what is explicitly needed. This means restricting access to specific applications rather than providing broad access to multiple resources, some of which ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 28% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 27% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

SecureW2 vs Portnox

Compared 7% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 43% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 34% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 23% of the time

More Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

May 2025

Download Portnox product report

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

May 2025

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) report

Download Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Symantec Secure Access Cloud, Luminate.io, Luminate

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), revolutionizes remote access security for enterprise applications. By replacing traditional VPNs with secure, temporary connections solely to required applications, it significantly reduces the attack surface, mitigating the risk of data breaches. Whether accessing cloud-based or on-premises applications, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) ensures robust security through continuous authentication and authorization, adhering to the Zero Trust principle of "never trust, always verify." This solution not only enhances security by reducing unauthorized access but also simplifies access for users while offering scalability and cost savings by eliminating the need for complex hardware and software. Tailored for organizations with remote workforces, cloud-based applications, and stringent data security concerns, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) stands as an efficient and scalable access control solution among its competitors.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

NEX, AIG, Fiverr, Upwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Check Point Software Technologies, Fortinet and others in ZTNA. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

855,156 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.