Portnox vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) comparison

Portnox Security and Broadcom are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Portnox Security is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.7, while Broadcom is ranked #24. Portnox Security holds a 1.0% mindshare in Z, compared to Broadcom’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Portnox Security users are willing to recommend the solution.

Portnox

Read 24 Portnox reviews

1,848 Views
74 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Read 1 Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) review

514 Views
98 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Portnox

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Portnox and Symantec Zero Trust Network Access ZTNA are solutions in the network security landscape. Portnox has the upper hand in customer satisfaction and ease of deployment due to its flexibility and simplicity; however, Symantec ZTNA offers advanced features for enterprises seeking robust access management solutions.

Features: Portnox offers simplified network access control, enhanced BYOD management, and effective threat detection. Symantec ZTNA provides comprehensive security measures, integration across multiple platforms, and strong authentication protocols. Symantec's extensive integration capabilities offer a more feature-rich solution for complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox provides a straightforward cloud-based deployment, reducing setup complexities and time, which is beneficial for businesses with limited IT resources. While Symantec ZTNA offers a powerful suite of tools, it requires skilled IT involvement for implementation. Both offer responsive and helpful customer service, but Portnox's ease of deployment offers a slight advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers a more accessible pricing structure, with competitive setup costs and strong ROI due to efficient deployment and operation. Symantec ZTNA, with a higher initial investment, delivers substantial ROI in environments that can fully leverage its advanced features. Portnox is a more cost-effective solution for those prioritizing affordability, while Symantec targets enterprises ready for a premium investment in network security.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,160 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in ZTNA

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Access Control (NAC) (6th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Symantec Zero Trust Network...

Ranking in ZTNA

24th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (25th), ZTNA as a Service (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Portnox is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Portnox	1.0%
Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)	1.1%
Other	97.9%

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

cto543714

CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Restricts access to applications but improvement is needed in integrations

Over the last year, I have been working with customers because it's changing and maturing. These things are rolled out in segments and chunks, not all at once. Additional internal work is often required to make it functional, such as properly configuring the active directory. This internal work can take up to three months. The process varies, and implementing Symantec ZTNA quickly is not realistic. I wouldn't recommend the tool to non-core customers because you won't get the support you need. I'd rate Symantec ZTNA a seven on a scale of one to ten. They're still integrating different pieces into their solution. The challenge with ZTNA is that different companies implement it slightly differently, with some features present in one product but missing in another. ZTNA is a tricky acronym that companies use, but when you look closely, you find that each vendor might only have some of the expected features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's agentless, and it's scalable."

"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."

"It's a stable product."

"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

"For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."

"It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components."

"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."

More Portnox pros

"The most valuable feature of this product is restricting and controlling what people have access to. If I want a contractor to connect to my network, I can give them access to only the specific things they need without giving them full VPN access to my entire network. That's the main benefit everyone gets from it. The value depends on how many users and applications you have and what you want to share."

Cons

"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."

"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."

"The price could be better."

"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."

"Portnox can occasionally knock out a switch port, causing network downtime and requiring manual reset."

"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."

"Their filtering system tends to lag quite a bit, so when I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly."

More Portnox cons

"For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don't. For example, if you want to use two-factor authentication, you need to integrate that into the solution. Or if you want to accept protocols other than web coming to your secure gateway, that's another integration. Supporting different devices like Macs, Samsung phones, or iPhones also requires more integrations. Ensuring all these integrations work properly is an ongoing process and a moving target."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Portnox Clear is reasonable."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

Pricing varies depending on the situation. In competitive situations, it's usually priced competitively. Nobody pays the full MSRP. Typically, you negotiate and work with them on the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

For areas of improvement, the main issue is with integrations. The Symantec ZTNA comprises many products cobbled together on the back end. Sometimes, the integrations work well; sometimes, they don...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)?

The solution helps to allow access only to what is explicitly needed. This means restricting access to specific applications rather than providing broad access to multiple resources, some of which ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 25% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 24% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 14% of the time

Keytos vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 34% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 19% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)

Compared 19% of the time

More Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

September 2025

Download Portnox product report

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

September 2025

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) report

Download Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Symantec Secure Access Cloud, Luminate.io, Luminate

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), revolutionizes remote access security for enterprise applications. By replacing traditional VPNs with secure, temporary connections solely to required applications, it significantly reduces the attack surface, mitigating the risk of data breaches. Whether accessing cloud-based or on-premises applications, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) ensures robust security through continuous authentication and authorization, adhering to the Zero Trust principle of "never trust, always verify." This solution not only enhances security by reducing unauthorized access but also simplifies access for users while offering scalability and cost savings by eliminating the need for complex hardware and software. Tailored for organizations with remote workforces, cloud-based applications, and stringent data security concerns, Symantec Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) stands as an efficient and scalable access control solution among its competitors.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

NEX, AIG, Fiverr, Upwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in ZTNA. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.