Portnox vs Twingate comparison

Read 1 Twingate review

2,557 Views
153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Portnox and Twingate compete in the network security sector. Twingate appears to have an advantage due to its advanced features and high security level.

Features: Portnox provides comprehensive network access control, strong endpoint visibility, and agentless deployment. Twingate emphasizes secure and seamless remote access, zero-trust networking, and integration with existing infrastructure.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox offers a straightforward deployment process and efficient customer support. Twingate impresses with quick deployment and seamless integration, backed by strong support.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers competitive pricing and a strong ROI through cost-effective solutions. Twingate, though more expensive, is considered worth the investment due to its high security and functionality, providing substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Access Control (NAC) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Network Access Control (NAC)

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Ranking in ZTNA

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Twingate

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

12th

Ranking in ZTNA

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Internet Security (13th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (13th), ZTNA as a Service (15th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Portnox is 5.2%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Twingate is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Portnox	5.2%
Twingate	0.7%
Other	94.1%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Joey Benamy

Senior Cyber Liability Engineer at OncoLens

Helps reduce access-related support tickets, is quick to deploy, and streamlines onboarding

We were able to add Twingate into our infrastructure without having to change our infrastructure or how people work. We reaped the benefits of Twingate immediately because it replaced an alternative solution with a lot of overhead. Twingate helped reduce access-related support tickets by 80 percent. Twingate streamlines onboarding for our company, especially for the engineering team, by automating resource access through directory integrations. New employees generally require no manual configuration within Twingate, saving us significant time and effort. The resiliency is directly proportional to the level of control we exert over its components. We can manage Twingate connectors to support high availability, ensuring the system is as reliable as needed. This flexibility and control enhance Twingate's resiliency capabilities significantly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The simplicity of the product is commendable."

"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."

"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."

More Portnox pros

"I appreciate Twingate's developer-first approach, particularly its excellent developer tools for deployment and management."

Cons

"We have seen instances where the older version stops working properly, and we have to update each system individually."

"Allowing for a search of MAC addresses in the interface, whether they are authenticated on the network or not, would be beneficial. Currently, it only finds authenticated MAC addresses, which complicates troubleshooting when the same MAC address is used for different requests."

"The support team is very limited. They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours; the team sits in during the EMI and US hours."

"We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE."

"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end."

"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end. If there is an improvement, it should be around having more functions on the integration with the Wi-Fi controller I used, which was a UniFi controller, also on-prem."

More Portnox cons

"Twingate's lack of native support for Windows Server is a significant limitation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"The vendor price is fair."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"Twingate's pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Twingate?

Twingate's pricing is fair.

What needs improvement with Twingate?

Twingate's lack of native support for Windows Server is a significant limitation. While it hasn't directly affected my company, I've encountered this issue when assisting others. Additionally, the ...

What is your primary use case for Twingate?

We use Twingate for remote access.

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Comparisons

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 19% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 15% of the time

Keytos vs Portnox

Compared 8% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Tailscale vs Twingate

Compared 38% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Twingate

Compared 26% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Twingate

Compared 7% of the time

NordLayer vs Twingate

Compared 4% of the time

Sophos Network Access Control vs Twingate

Compared 4% of the time

More Twingate Competitors

Product Reports

Portnox

Download Portnox product report

Network Access Control (NAC)

Download Twingate product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

No data available

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Overview

Portnox provides advanced network visibility and proactive security without complexity, ensuring easy setup and scalability. Its agentless nature and intuitive design enable seamless device management and system integration, promoting efficient network operations and endpoint security.

Portnox is known for offering comprehensive network access control, providing firms with vital tools for managing authentication and securing endpoint devices. It's praised for ease of use in integrating with systems such as RADIUS servers and offering detailed analytical capabilities to ensure compliance and control unauthorized access. While users appreciate the intuitive interface and device management, improvements have been suggested in the areas of better GUI, integration with firewalls, and enhanced configuration methods. Portnox aids in handling dynamic VLAN assignments and securing access in both wired and wireless networks, proving particularly valuable for on-premises and remote environments.

What are the key features of Portnox?

Network Visibility: Offers comprehensive oversight of network activities.
Agentless Setup: Ensures easy implementation with minimal disruption.
Compliance Checks: Provides tools for compliance verification and incident reporting.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with existing IT systems for efficient management.

What benefits should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Prioritizes proactive measures to secure endpoints.
Easy Management: Facilitates straightforward device handling and network control.
Efficiency: Streamlines network operations for better performance.
Scalability: Adapts to organizational growth without complexities.

In industries where network security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Portnox is implemented to fortify access control and manage endpoint connections effectively. Its ability to secure both on-premises and remote environments makes it a versatile choice across sectors that require stringent access management, particularly where unauthorized device connections pose significant risks.

Portnox Security

Twingate is a cloud-based network security platform that offers secure, zero-trust access to corporate applications and resources. Its primary use case is to provide remote access to employees, contractors, and partners, allowing them to work securely from anywhere. Twingate's most valuable functionality is its ability to create secure access policies based on user identity, device, and network context. This enables organizations to enforce granular access controls, reducing the risk of data breaches and insider threats.

By leveraging Twingate, organizations can improve their security posture and reduce the IT burden of managing traditional VPNs. It also helps organizations to comply with regulatory requirements, such as GDPR and HIPAA, by providing a secure and auditable access solution.

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Blend, Modern Health, Webflow, Liberis, Cerebral, Homebase, Bloomreach, Cameo, Hippo and Bitpanda

Network Access Control (NAC)