Portnox vs Ruckus Cloudpath comparison

Portnox Security and Ruckus are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Ruckus is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3. Portnox Security holds a 4.7% mindshare in NAC, compared to Ruckus’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Portnox Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Portnox

Read 24 Portnox reviews

1,848 Views
1,608 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 12 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

957 Views
957 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Portnox

Ruckus Cloudpath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Portnox and Ruckus Cloudpath are competing network management solutions focused on enhancing security for businesses. Portnox seems to have the upper hand with its robust network visibility and management capabilities, whereas Ruckus Cloudpath's strength lies in its secure access management features.

Features: Portnox offers automated network access control, risk assessment, and compliance monitoring, providing comprehensive network security management. Portnox also supports seamless integration with existing infrastructures, aiding in network operations. Ruckus Cloudpath focuses on secure BYOD and guest Wi-Fi onboarding, robust identity-driven security, and policy management, enhancing its secure access features.

Room for Improvement: Portnox could enhance its interface for more intuitive navigation and improve its support resources for faster troubleshooting. There might be a need for more detailed documentation to assist in complex policy configurations. Ruckus Cloudpath may benefit from simplifying its initial setup process and policy configurations to reduce complexity, and it could improve scalability for larger networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is known for straightforward implementation and seamless integration with existing system infrastructures, accompanied by dedicated support channels. Ruckus Cloudpath supports simple deployment models advantageous for mid-sized to large organizations and provides extensive documentation and community forums, which can be beneficial but may require detailed understanding from customers.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers competitive pricing models with flexible, scalable options that often result in a favorable return on investment due to its extensive network management capabilities. In contrast, Ruckus Cloudpath might come at a higher cost, but it justifies this with advanced security and seamless user experiences, prioritizing secure access management.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (12th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Portnox is 4.7%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 1.9%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Portnox	4.7%
Ruckus Cloudpath	1.9%
Other	93.4%

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Gary Koh

Area Manager at Alpha Media Pte Ltd

Has improved network monitoring through intelligent features and simplified onboarding

I am using the certificate-based security feature in the product. The certificate-based security feature helps clients understand what Ruckus Cloudpath can do. Whether cloud or on-premises is used is defined by the clients. They are knowledgeable about the products, so minimal explanation is required. Policy management tools in Ruckus Cloudpath are performing adequately. The integration of Ruckus Cloudpath with our infrastructure is very user-friendly, as the software is becoming more intelligent. It is becoming more intelligent because it is easier to install and implement. Managing IoT devices within a network environment has improved compared to previous versions. The software is more intelligent now, with AI features integrated into their management system. The MMS portion is the best feature in Ruckus Cloudpath, as they can monitor the entire network intelligently with AI features that simplify the troubleshooting processes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cloud-based feature is very nice. We use Meraki for our switching, and it is simple to point all of our networks and offices to Portnox. It is pretty seamless."

"Previous to the deployment we didn't have complete visibility of all the endpoints, all the devices that are connected to the network. But with the deployment of portnox, we could see all the devices and where they're connecting. We can equally segregate and apply different rules, policies to each location that we didn't monitor specifically."

"The most important feature is that this solution is agentless. So, you don't have to install any agents on endpoints."

"It's agentless, and it's scalable."

"The technical support is top-notch."

"The Portnox dashboard is very easy to use, and the UI is simple."

"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

More Portnox pros

"Ruckus Cloudpath is effective for network security since it points out errors, especially when working with APIs."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

"The ease of use is great, and the automation wizards can do a lot."

"The most valuable features of Ruckus Cloudpath include its long-range capabilities, smooth and uninterrupted service, and reliability."

"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

Cons

"Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts."

"Their filtering system tends to lag quite a bit, so when I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"The support team is very limited. They don't have much support during Asia Pacific hours; the team sits in during the EMI and US hours."

"Their filtering system tends to lag quite a bit, so when I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly."

"In terms of operational efficiency, things are more complicated now. It takes more time to get devices on the network, but we increased security quite a bit."

"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."

"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."

More Portnox cons

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."

"There is room for improvement in deployment."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"The main disadvantage is the price, as it is primarily a cost issue."

"The scalability could be better."

"There is room for improvement in deployment. I would like to see more effort put into troubleshooting."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is quite reasonable."

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"The vendor price is fair."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side. I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

The user interface of Ruckus Cloudpath needs some enhancement along with the support process, requiring more qualified engineers to support this product. The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath needs a lit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 24% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 24% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 14% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 52% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 28% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 12% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

September 2025

Download Portnox product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath

September 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

No data available

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Ruckus

Overview

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

September 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.