Portnox vs Ruckus Cloudpath comparison

Portnox Security and Ruckus are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. Portnox Security is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while Ruckus is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.2. Portnox Security holds a 4.2% mindshare in NAC, compared to Ruckus’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Portnox Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Ruckus users who would recommend it.

Portnox

Read 22 Portnox reviews

1,775 Views
1,562 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ruckus Cloudpath

Read 11 Ruckus Cloudpath reviews

1,011 Views
1,011 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Portnox

Ruckus Cloudpath

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Portnox and Ruckus Cloudpath are products competing in the network security space with network access control and secure onboarding solutions. Portnox has the upper hand in customer support and pricing, while Ruckus Cloudpath stands out for its robust features and security solutions.

Features: Portnox provides network visibility, automated response capabilities, and compliance management tools. It allows for easy integration with various vendor devices and has a simple user interface. Ruckus Cloudpath offers secure onboarding, integration flexibility, and advanced certificate management for network access, alongside multi-factor authentication and powerful encryption capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Portnox could enhance its scalability options and simplify its complex documentation. Its pricing model could be more transparent. Meanwhile, Ruckus Cloudpath might improve by simplifying its deployment process, offering more personalized customer support, and reducing its cost for small to medium-sized enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox is noted for a straightforward deployment process and strong customer support, which facilitates smooth implementation. Although Ruckus Cloudpath requires a more complex setup, it compensates with comprehensive documentation and training resources, ensuring users can overcome integration challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers competitive pricing with a favorable return on investment, ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises. Ruckus Cloudpath, although a more premium option, justifies its higher cost with advanced features and scalability, providing higher long-term value for larger organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (11th), Passwordless Authentication (1st)

Ruckus Cloudpath

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Portnox is 4.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ruckus Cloudpath is 1.9%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Mohammad Abdur Rahim Sarker

Technical Consultant - Bangladesh, Nepal & Bhutan at Redington Distribution Pte Ltd.

Long-range capabilities and robust security have empowered seamless and reliable connections in diverse environments

Our primary use case for Ruckus Cloudpath is within the hospitality industry and educational institutions, such as large hotels and universities. We implemented the solution in the infrastructure to provide services to customers and students. Specifically, we use it in premises like student labs…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

"The cloud-based feature is very nice."

"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."

"It's agentless, and it's scalable."

"The cloud-based feature of Portnox is excellent."

"The Vidahost feature is currently in action, and it appears to be providing valuable data insights."

"The cloud-based feature is very nice. We use Meraki for our switching, and it is simple to point all of our networks and offices to Portnox. It is pretty seamless."

"I am impressed with the solution's voucher capability and authentication. The tool is integrated with Active Direct storage."

More Portnox pros

"The most valuable features of Ruckus Cloudpath include its long-range capabilities, smooth and uninterrupted service, and reliability."

"I have found it easy to use with no significant issues once the small initial problems were resolved."

"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."

"Ruckus Cloudpath is effective for network security since it points out errors, especially when working with APIs."

"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."

"The wireless devices are used to control access, transmit messages, and integrate with the main system."

"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."

More Ruckus Cloudpath pros

Cons

"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."

"However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"It could be a little cheaper."

"Their filtering system tends to lag quite a bit, so when I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly."

"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."

"The Wi-Fi integration could be done better from their end."

More Portnox cons

"The setup process is a bit complex."

"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."

"Ruckus Cloudpath needs more API features and enhanced automation capabilities."

"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

"The scalability could be better."

"There is room for improvement in deployment."

"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."

"The setup had a few initial small problems, however, everything was resolved and it is very good now."

More Ruckus Cloudpath cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for port licensing and support on a yearly basis, and it's not cheap."

"The tool is more expensive than Fortinet."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"The vendor price is fair."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"Pricing is quite reasonable."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"I would rate the tool's pricing as a seven on a scale of one to ten. Compared to others, it's not overly expensive, but it does come with a cost. Since it's a licensed-based product, it can become expensive, especially if there is a need for additional licenses."

"The cost was somewhere around $700 for the access points, however, there was a discount."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ruckus Cloudpath?

The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward an...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ruckus Cloudpath?

The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath is on the expensive side. I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ruckus Cloudpath?

The user interface of Ruckus Cloudpath needs some enhancement along with the support process, requiring more qualified engineers to support this product. The pricing of Ruckus Cloudpath needs a lit...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 25% of the time

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 25% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 14% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 54% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 28% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Ruckus Cloudpath

Compared 12% of the time

More Ruckus Cloudpath Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

August 2025

Download Portnox product report

Buyer's Guide

Ruckus Cloudpath

August 2025

Download Ruckus Cloudpath product report

Also Known As

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

No data available

Interactive Demo

Portnox Security

Demo not available

Ruckus

Overview

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Ruckus

Sample Customers

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

July 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. Ruckus Cloudpath report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.