Portnox and Axiad Conductor compete in the network security and identity management category. Axiad Conductor seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features, while Portnox strengths lie in pricing and customer support, appealing to cost-conscious buyers.
Features: Portnox offers robust network visibility, access control capabilities, and excellent integration in diverse IT environments. It provides a convenient user interface and supports seamless integration with various security solutions. Axiad Conductor provides an integrated identity credential management solution, with strong security and compliance focus, lifecycle management of credentials, and efficient device lifecycle management.
Room for Improvement: Portnox could improve its advanced security features and compliance specializations. Its reporting feature can be enhanced for better user insights, and scalability should be more straightforward. Axiad Conductor needs to simplify its enrollment processes further, reduce deployment complexity, and enhance support resources to aid in complex setups.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox provides a straightforward installation process with accessible customer support, making it user-friendly for various organizations. Axiad Conductor offers a more complex deployment but provides extensive support resources to handle setup challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Portnox is recognized for its cost-effective pricing model, delivering substantial value relative to its setup cost. Axiad Conductor demands a higher initial investment, but its superior feature set promises long-term ROI for those with demanding security needs.
If you were moving from a traditional on-premise NAC that was 100% managed by the IT department, there would be great savings in going to a cloud-based NAC with Portnox.
The main area needing improvement is the technical knowledge of support staff.
I was seeing weird things, and they were able to explain things to me and help me quickly find a resolution.
They resolved issues quickly and provided clear explanations.
In the four years that I used Portnox, if it crashed or the server crashed, that would not have been more than once.
If there is a version one and another version, the communication between the organization using it and Portnox should be firm so they can coordinate effectively.
The product itself is available and its uptime is 100%.
Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.
It was a seamless integration, but we did experience some difficulties initially where mobile phones were being locked out until we figured out how to set footprints for mobile phones that would be able to connect using Portnox to access the Wi-Fi in the environment.
This authentication issue with Portnox needs to be addressed.
You are charged according to the number of users.
The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe.
If you compare Portnox with all other well-known standard products, it is the cheapest.
It is a very robust application because three teams use that part: the network team, the security team, and the support people.
It's notable how Portnox has improved operational efficiency.
You can see a PC connected to it, and you can tell which user the PC is using and which version of the OS it's running.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Portnox | 16.1% |
Axiad Conductor | 4.6% |
Other | 79.3% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 12 |
Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
Large Enterprise | 7 |
Axiad Conductor offers a user-friendly platform for managing multifactor authentication and credential lifecycle, supporting seamless transitions to cloud environments for enhanced security compliance and access control.
Axiad Conductor stands out with intuitive management of multifactor authentication systems, assertive device lifecycle management, and a managed cloud solution that streamlines operations. It promotes user self-service for credential updates, minimizing the need for extensive training. With the capability to handle large networks, it enhances efficiency while meeting contract demands. Addressing user suggestions, plans include interface design updates and Canadian hosting, although macOS's frequent updates pose integration challenges.
What are the principal features of Axiad Conductor?
What should users look for in terms of ROI and benefits?
In diverse industries, Axiad Conductor is implemented to manage multifactor authentication and PKI elements like smart cards and YubiKeys. Organizations leverage it to ensure compliance, facilitate secure workforce access, and transition PKI systems to the cloud, handling substantial volumes of smart card and machine certificates with ease.
Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.
Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.
What are the essential features of Portnox?
What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?
Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.
We monitor all Passwordless Authentication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.