Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Sentinel Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Sentinel Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Sentinel Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Sentinel based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Sentinel surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat detection and analytics, seamless integration with existing Microsoft services, and advanced AI-driven capabilities, providing robust security solutions tailored for modern enterprises.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon offers strong integration and robust threat detection, appealing to buyers seeking comprehensive security. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels in automation and cloud-native integration, making it attractive for organizations leveraging Azure's infrastructure and Microsoft's cohesive services.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs emphasize streamlined implementation, while Microsoft Sentinel offers flexible pricing, highlighting distinct cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup costs emphasize streamlined implementation, while Microsoft Sentinel offers flexible pricing, highlighting distinct cost structures.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel offers advanced analytics and AI-driven insights, making it a feature-rich security solution. In comparison, Wazuh's open-source flexibility and integration options provide a competitive alternative. While Sentinel's proprietary nature can be limiting, Wazuh's complexity in setup might deter some users.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Wazuh Report
Microsoft Sentinel setup cost involves subscription fees based on data ingested, while Wazuh has a lower initial cost as it is open-source.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Sentinel setup cost involves subscription fees based on data ingested, while Wazuh has a lower initial cost as it is open-source.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust data analysis features for complex environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel, with its cloud-native architecture, provides scalability and seamless Microsoft 365 integration. Splunk's extensive capabilities appeal to analytics-focused users, whereas Sentinel's automation benefits those prioritizing efficiency and integration.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Sentinel, which provides a more budget-friendly initial setup option. This significant cost difference can be a deciding factor for organizations evaluating these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Sentinel, which provides a more budget-friendly initial setup option. This significant cost difference can be a deciding factor for organizations evaluating these two solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers robust on-premise security features with strengths in data accuracy and real-time alerting. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels in cloud-native scalability and seamless integration within Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to businesses prioritizing cloud deployments and automated responses.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
IBM Security QRadar is noted for its higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower initial setup expense, highlighting a significant cost discrepancy between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar is noted for its higher initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower initial setup expense, highlighting a significant cost discrepancy between the two solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR offers robust endpoint security with advanced detection and integration capabilities, ideal for managing complex networks. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel provides cloud-native threat detection tailored for seamless integration with Microsoft products, appealing to organizations prioritizing cloud environments and automation.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks typically has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks typically has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more cost-effective setup.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security offers competitive pricing and robust customer support. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel leads in feature-rich offerings and overall user satisfaction despite higher costs. While Elastic Security excels in scalability and integration, Microsoft Sentinel stands out for its advanced AI-driven analytics and extensive Microsoft tool integration.
Download Elastic Security vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Elastic Security offers lower upfront setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup costs are higher but include more comprehensive initial support.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security offers lower upfront setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup costs are higher but include more comprehensive initial support.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
AWS Security Hub excels in automating compliance checks and offers a centralized dashboard for security management. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel is noted for its robust integration with various data sources and advanced analytics. AWS Security Hub is praised for its ease of deployment, while Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive feature integration.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
AWS Security Hub has an initial setup cost that is straightforward and predictable, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup cost is variable and can be more complex depending on organizational needs.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Security Hub has an initial setup cost that is straightforward and predictable, while Microsoft Sentinel's setup cost is variable and can be more complex depending on organizational needs.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XSOAR excels in customizable playbooks and powerful automation, suitable for dynamic actions and mature SOC processes. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, ideal for environments with Microsoft solutions, offering competitive pricing and strong cost-effective integration capabilities.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Report
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR setup cost is reportedly higher than Microsoft Sentinel, which provides a more accessible initial investment. The pricing distinction highlights potential differences in total cost and ease of entry between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR setup cost is reportedly higher than Microsoft Sentinel, which provides a more accessible initial investment. The pricing distinction highlights potential differences in total cost and ease of entry between the two cybersecurity solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel excels in integrating with Azure and offers comprehensive threat visibility via its ecosystem. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM provides potent network security and machine learning capabilities. Buyers may choose Sentinel for seamless Microsoft integration, while others might prefer XSIAM for unified threat management.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Microsoft Sentinel has a flexible setup cost, often preferred by users requiring scalability, while Cortex XSIAM features a higher initial setup, which can be a deterrent for smaller organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Sentinel has a flexible setup cost, often preferred by users requiring scalability, while Cortex XSIAM features a higher initial setup, which can be a deterrent for smaller organizations.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
LogRhythm SIEM excels in in-depth threat detection and forensic capabilities, requiring better ease-of-use enhancements. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers comprehensive features and broad integrations, needing alert efficiency improvements. LogRhythm's strong customer support contrasts with Microsoft Sentinel's ease of deployment and variable support experience.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more economical setup option for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
LogRhythm SIEM has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more economical setup option for businesses.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Rapid7 InsightIDR excels in pricing and customer service, with straightforward deployment and cost efficiency. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel, though more complex to set up, offers extensive integration and analytics capabilities, providing strong long-term ROI through advanced feature sets and substantial support resources.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Rapid7 InsightIDR Report
Rapid7 InsightIDR has a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Microsoft Sentinel requires a higher initial investment but offers extensive integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightIDR has a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while Microsoft Sentinel requires a higher initial investment but offers extensive integration capabilities.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSIEM is recognized for its pricing and support, whereas Microsoft Sentinel is acknowledged for its advanced features and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. In comparison, FortiSIEM is cost-effective with superior customer service. Microsoft Sentinel offers robust analytics and AI-driven insights.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Fortinet FortiSIEM has high setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Users report that Fortinet FortiSIEM's setup process is complex compared to the comparatively straightforward setup of Microsoft Sentinel.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSIEM has high setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. Users report that Fortinet FortiSIEM's setup process is complex compared to the comparatively straightforward setup of Microsoft Sentinel.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
AlienVault OSSIM is praised for threat intelligence and log management, while Microsoft Sentinel is favored for scalability and integration. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's advanced analytics appeal to tech buyers. AlienVault OSSIM is cost-effective; however, Microsoft Sentinel's higher ROI justifies the expense.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
AlienVault OSSIM has higher setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers more cost-effective initial setup options. Microsoft Sentinel is tailored for cost-conscious setups, whereas AlienVault OSSIM may carry additional setup expense due to its features.
View comparison
Pricing
AlienVault OSSIM has higher setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers more cost-effective initial setup options. Microsoft Sentinel is tailored for cost-conscious setups, whereas AlienVault OSSIM may carry additional setup expense due to its features.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Splunk SOAR
4.0 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in flexibility with third-party integrations, appealing to users prioritizing diverse tool compatibility. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel benefits from native Microsoft ecosystem integration, appealing to those seeking powerful analytics within a familiar cloud environment, complemented by cost predictability in its pricing model.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5

Organizations use Cribl for migrating to Splunk Cloud and managing log collection. It forwards logs to Splunk Cloud, curates data, and replays events for cost efficiency. Cribl reduces licensing costs by segregating less critical logs and ensures smooth transitions between log management tools like Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, and Datadog.

Download Cribl vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
I would not say it is a cheaply priced tool as it has been doing wonders in the market. The tool has been budget-friendly for organizations.
The product pricing is reasonable compared to other solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
I would not say it is a cheaply priced tool as it has been doing wonders in the market. The tool has been budget-friendly for organizations.
The product pricing is reasonable compared to other solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel offers advanced threat detection and integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite provides comprehensive data analysis and superior visibility into security threats. A tech buyer might choose Sentinel for integration capabilities, whereas Chronicle Suite is preferred for thorough analysis.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Microsoft Sentinel has an initial setup cost that varies greatly depending on deployment scale, while Google Chronicle Suite offers a more straightforward and potentially lower initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Sentinel has an initial setup cost that varies greatly depending on deployment scale, while Google Chronicle Suite offers a more straightforward and potentially lower initial setup cost.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Sentinel offers cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers needing reliable monitoring. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's advanced analytics and integration with Microsoft services justify a higher investment. Microsoft Sentinel's feature-rich package is ideal for those seeking superior analytics and integration capabilities.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Sentinel Report
Sentinel has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel. Microsoft Sentinel's setup is less expensive and more efficient than Sentinel's.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentinel has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel. Microsoft Sentinel's setup is less expensive and more efficient than Sentinel's.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM excels in feature breadth, offering advanced threat detection and user behavior analytics, making it appealing for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel's seamless integration with Microsoft products and cloud-native capabilities makes it ideal for organizations within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Securonix Next-Gen SIEM Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive integration with Azure services, whereas Securonix emphasizes advanced threat detection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Microsoft Sentinel provides extensive integration with Azure services, whereas Securonix emphasizes advanced threat detection capabilities.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Exabeam excels with advanced analytics and automated incident response, appealing to those seeking cost-effectiveness and quick setup. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates with Azure services and AI-driven threat detection, ideal for complex environments needing extensive features and scalability, justifying its higher cost.
Download Exabeam vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Exabeam has a high setup cost with a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and easier initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam has a high setup cost with a steep learning curve, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a lower setup cost and easier initial setup.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
ManageEngine Log360 offers competitive pricing and ease of deployment with efficient log management and real-time alerting. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates broad threat intelligence and machine learning capabilities. ManageEngine Log360 suits mid-sized organizations; Microsoft Sentinel delivers high value through advanced features for larger enterprises.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
ManageEngine Log360 has a higher setup cost while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Log360 has a higher setup cost while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Stellar Cyber Open XDR enhances threat detection and response with automated incident response and centralized data correlation. Its seamless integration provides visibility and management. Advanced analytics and machine learning identify threats efficiently. Users appreciate its integration, real-time detection, and automation but suggest better third-party integration, documentation, and more intuitive setup.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
It’s a single license platform.
View comparison
Pricing
It’s a single license platform.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel excels with extensive cloud integration and analytics, appealing to organizations utilizing Microsoft services. In comparison, Tines focuses on automation processes, offering specialized workflows and incident responses that can be tailored for enhanced efficiency, justifying its potentially higher upfront cost for some.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Tines Report
Microsoft Sentinel has a free setup cost, while Tines includes a moderate initial expense. The difference in setup cost may influence the initial affordability for businesses when choosing between these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Sentinel has a free setup cost, while Tines includes a moderate initial expense. The difference in setup cost may influence the initial affordability for businesses when choosing between these security solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Adlumin Cybersecurity
1 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel shines with scalability and integration with Microsoft services, ideal for organizations leveraging Azure. In comparison, Adlumin Cybersecurity excels in regulatory compliance and rapid incident response, appealing to businesses prioritizing detailed compliance features and proactive customer support.
Microsoft Sentinel offers a higher initial setup cost, while Adlumin Cybersecurity provides a more budget-friendly setup. This difference positions Adlumin as a more accessible option for budget-conscious organizations seeking effective cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Sentinel offers a higher initial setup cost, while Adlumin Cybersecurity provides a more budget-friendly setup. This difference positions Adlumin as a more accessible option for budget-conscious organizations seeking effective cybersecurity solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Devo excels with scalability, real-time analytics, and customizable dashboards, drawing users with a cost-effective setup. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers comprehensive threat detection and AI-driven insights. Buyers may favor Sentinel for long-term ROI despite its higher setup cost, appreciating extensive support options.
Download Devo vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Devo has a higher setup cost than Microsoft Sentinel, making it less attractive for budget-conscious businesses. Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial investment, appealing to organizations looking for a lower setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Devo has a higher setup cost than Microsoft Sentinel, making it less attractive for budget-conscious businesses. Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective initial investment, appealing to organizations looking for a lower setup expense.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere offers threat detection and incident response while being easy to deploy and customer-friendly. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates advanced analytics with other Microsoft products. Both have improvement areas, with Sentinel's superior features justifying its higher price, despite more complex deployment.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. USM Anywhere Report
The setup cost for USM Anywhere is typically higher than Microsoft Sentinel, with Sentinel offering a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for USM Anywhere is typically higher than Microsoft Sentinel, with Sentinel offering a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations is known for its strong automation and incident management, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers scalability with AI-driven insights and Azure integration, appealing to organizations using Azure seeking a simplified, cost-effective solution.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. ServiceNow Security Operations Report
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel boasts a lower entry barrier with its setup cost, highlighting a noticeable difference in the initial financial commitment needed for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel boasts a lower entry barrier with its setup cost, highlighting a noticeable difference in the initial financial commitment needed for each solution.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer excels in cost and support, with intuitive log management and real-time alerting. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel justifies its higher price with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration with other Microsoft services. Sentinel offers advanced features and analytics, providing long-term value and reduced operational risk.
Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer has a straightforward, lower-cost initial setup, while Microsoft Sentinel requires a more complex, higher-priced setup process. ManageEngine provides a faster implementation, contrasting Microsoft's more resource-intensive deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer has a straightforward, lower-cost initial setup, while Microsoft Sentinel requires a more complex, higher-priced setup process. ManageEngine provides a faster implementation, contrasting Microsoft's more resource-intensive deployment.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager
3.9 out of 5
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers extensive integration with various platforms, benefiting small businesses with robust tools. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels in cloud-native structures and advanced AI features within the Microsoft ecosystem, appealing to organizations prioritizing cloud technologies.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager Report
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager has a higher setup cost than Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, highlighting the financial considerations organizations may face when choosing between these two security management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager has a higher setup cost than Microsoft Sentinel, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, highlighting the financial considerations organizations may face when choosing between these two security management solutions.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security excels in real-time analytics and scalability, while Microsoft Sentinel offers superior integration with Microsoft products and advanced AI capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel features machine learning and deep Microsoft ecosystem integration, whereas Sumo Logic Security is noted for its simple deployment and competitive pricing.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sumo Logic Security incurs a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more affordable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security incurs a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more affordable setup cost.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Netwrix Auditor
4.6 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Netwrix Auditor
4.6 out of 5
Netwrix Auditor is known for detailed auditing and user tracking. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels in SIEM capabilities and integration with Microsoft products. Netwrix Auditor's ease of deployment and competitive pricing contrast with Microsoft Sentinel’s complex setup but superior security features and technical support.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Netwrix Auditor Report
Netwrix Auditor boasts a lower setup cost with efficient deployment, while Microsoft Sentinel's higher setup cost reflects its advanced features and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
Netwrix Auditor boasts a lower setup cost with efficient deployment, while Microsoft Sentinel's higher setup cost reflects its advanced features and complexity.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
FortiSOAR offers appealing pricing, strong customer support, and versatile automation, making it ideal for businesses seeking effective SOAR solutions. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel excels in AI-driven analytics and Azure integration, attracting tech buyers focused on scalability and comprehensive SIEM features.
Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Fortinet FortiSOAR features straightforward setup costs with a focus on scalability, while Microsoft Sentinel offers budget-friendly options suitable for smaller businesses. The primary difference lies in the scalability and cost-effectiveness of each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSOAR features straightforward setup costs with a focus on scalability, while Microsoft Sentinel offers budget-friendly options suitable for smaller businesses. The primary difference lies in the scalability and cost-effectiveness of each solution.
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Sentinel Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint emphasizes cost-effectiveness and easy deployment with strong customer support and seamless integration. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel focuses on advanced threat detection supported by AI and extensive cloud capabilities. Tech buyers may prefer Logpoint for affordability or choose Microsoft Sentinel for superior security management efficiency.
Download Logpoint vs. Microsoft Sentinel Report
Logpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel. Microsoft Sentinel offers a comprehensive feature set at a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Sentinel. Microsoft Sentinel offers a comprehensive feature set at a higher setup cost.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms